• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution v Creation...who are we to say?

AnEmpiricalAgnostic

Agnostic by Fact, Atheist by Epiphany
May 25, 2005
2,740
186
51
South Florida
Visit site
✟26,987.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
RufusTheRevelator said:
I looked at this forum searching for some concious discussion, but instead i find a group of people belittleing each other with petty insults and faults.
RufusTheRevelator said:
Really who are we to tell what really happened?

were all the same whether christian, athiest, humanist, jewish or whatever.
This forum is rich in information. All you have to do is ask. I sometimes feel like I should pay some of the participants here for the amount I have learned from them. Unfortunately the trolling sock puppets put out a higher volume of forum fecal matter as threads. If you are actually looking for earnest discussion or debate start a thread and you will be pleasantly surprised at the wealth of knowledge the participants have.

 
Upvote 0
G

GoSeminoles!

Guest
A troll is a person who posts statements or questions intended to start a brawl, where such statements and questions had been addressed many, many times before. It is evidence the person has not read the forum before posting to it. A troll will participate little in any thread he starts.

On this forum a troll is also known as a drive-by creationist.
 
Upvote 0

MartinM

GondolierAce
Feb 9, 2003
4,215
258
43
Visit site
✟5,655.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
RufusTheRevelator said:
I looked at this forum searching for some concious discussion, but instead i find a group of people belittleing each other with petty insults and faults.
Really who are we to tell what really happened?
were all the same whether christian, athiest, humanist, jewish or whatever.

And do you also apply this to, say, Holocaust denial? Moon hoax conspiracies? Flat Earthers?

Who are we to tell what really happened? We're the people observing the evidence of what really happened, that's who. Who better?
 
Upvote 0

EvoDan

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2005
756
55
Auburn, California
✟23,693.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
RufusTheRevelator said:
Really who are we to tell what really happened?

Ummm... scientists? Not me, but lots of others here.

Of course they're just looking at the evidence. If the creationists would care to present some...
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
RufusTheRevelator said:
Really who are we to tell what really happened?
were all the same whether christian, athiest, humanist, jewish or whatever.

We are an intelligent species that is able to use logic and experiments. That is who we are, and this is what allows us to figure out what really happened. It is the same process that forensic science uses to figure out how a crime was committed, and by whom. If you watch CSI you will see the same methodology that scientists use to figure out things that happened in the past.

This is quite a bit different than the method used by creationists. They assume that Genesis is an accurate record and that it is meant to be taken literaly. They then throw out any evidence that contradicts their beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
EvoDan said:
Ummm... scientists? Not me, but lots of others here.

Of course they're just looking at the evidence. If the creationists would care to present some...

Evidence for what? Creation? You could not have a creation with out a Creator. It could not have happened all by itself with out some sort of intelligence involved in the process somewhere. Even beyond that, you need a creative force, you can not have a creation, without a Creator.
 
Upvote 0

HairlessSimian

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2005
602
28
68
in the 21st century CE
✟875.00
Faith
Atheist
JohnR7 said:
Evidence for what? Creation? You could not have a creation with out a Creator. It could not have happened all by itself with out some sort of intelligence involved in the process somewhere. Even beyond that, you need a creative force, you can not have a creation, without a Creator.

Are the last 3 sentences supposed to constitute evidence? or a statement of faith?
 
Upvote 0

Ryal Kane

Senior Veteran
Apr 21, 2004
3,792
461
46
Hamilton
✟28,720.00
Faith
Atheist
JohnR7 said:
Evidence for what? Creation? You could not have a creation with out a Creator. It could not have happened all by itself with out some sort of intelligence involved in the process somewhere. Even beyond that, you need a creative force, you can not have a creation, without a Creator.

But creation is already a somewhat loaded word.
You could say the universe and not have it require a creator.
You could also say 'a creative force' and not require it to be intellegent.

And you know quite well what is meant by this and you're playing semantics.
What is being requested is scientific (prefereably peer reviewed) evidence of YEC or OEC.

That said, in your defense John, I certainly wouldn't consider you a troll.
Just occasionally frustrating perhaps. :mad: ;)
 
Upvote 0

mikeynov

Senior Veteran
Aug 28, 2004
1,990
127
✟2,746.00
Faith
Atheist
JohnR7 said:
Evidence for what? Creation? You could not have a creation with out a Creator. It could not have happened all by itself with out some sort of intelligence involved in the process somewhere. Even beyond that, you need a creative force, you can not have a creation, without a Creator.

An excellent demonstration of begging the question. Like, textbook perfect.
 
Upvote 0