The following instance of answered prayer, the one in question in the previous post has a probablilty of 1 / 31,201. I did not open up the bible and try for 10 years to get a response, which the statistics from dewaddict84 misrepresent. I opened up once and got a response. Which is one try out of 31,201 verses. There is also another fact that has been neglected and that is the fact of repeating occurences. Each of these stories have an individual instance probability, but together, the probability that all of these things could happen to one person is a staggering probability. Each story is listed with it's estimated probability. Then the total probability is listed below.
One time I thought about sueing some one but felt bad about it because I did not want to give a bad impression about what a Christian is like. So I prayed and asked God to show me clearly what to do. Latter that day I opened my bible at random, selecting a random verse and it opened to 1Co 6:7 "Nay, already it is altogether a defect in you, that ye have lawsuits one with another. Why not rather take wrong? why not rather be defrauded?" So I knew what God was thinking, no lawsuite.
1 / 31,201
Your statistical analysis assumes that only one single verse out of 31,201 is 'right'. Yes, the odds of of getting one particular verse is 1/31201, but the likelihood of getting
any verse that can be subjectively interpreted to refer to
any local circumstance, is quite substantial. That you got a verse pertaining to lawsuits is not that unlikely when you consider that fact that you had a
lot of things going on in your life, not just that single, short-lived conversation. No matter what verse you picked, you could twist it to fit your scenario.
One morning I got up and walked into the hall and I heard a voice say "How would you like to be stabbed in the Valley". The Valley was the rough end of town, and the voice scared me a little, I wondered if I had done something to offend God. I had planned to go down to the Valley to ask people out to church as was my habit at the time. In the end I went anyway regardles of the fear. I walked up to the first person I met and asked him if he would like to go out to church. He said to me "I am an atheist, I don't believe in God". I just said "fine", but hoped to change his mind. He then proceeded to unbutton his shirt and showed me scar marks up and down his chest and stomach. He said to me, "I was attacked by a knife weilding man in the Valley some time ago and spent months recovering in hospital, How could God allow that to happen to me". Then I knew why God had said in the morning "How would I like to be stabbed?". God understood this man, but had a good plan for him. Some weeks latter this man came out to church and became a Christian.
Allowing for 2 people with a similar story / Population of Brisbane
2/1,857,594
1/928797
To cut a long story short... that's not how probability works. You calculated the probability picking two people in a population who both have a trait (for which there is a 1:928797 chance). But that's absolute nonsense: what you really want is the odds that a) someone would come up to you with a knife, b) they'd start going to church, c) they'd become a Christian, d) you'd hear a voice pertaining to knives.
Your statistical analysis leaves much to be desired, and I'm very surprised even you can't see that.
Some time after the second Gulf War an Australian man Douglas Wood was capured by terrorists in Iraq, who made demands for a ransom or he would be executed. I set about fasting and praying for his release, I said to God "You know where he is....tell me". Three words entered my mind ABC, Bizaar and "A-meal". I thought "I am going crazy what has all that got to do with him. Bizaar I though "this is Bizarre". I thought maybe "A-meal" is a town so I searched a map of Iraq for a town of that name, but found nothing that really matched. Some time latter Douglas Wood was freed by US troops who came across his captors. It was not until latter that I actually discovered what the three words ment. I was on a forum libertyunites.us and came across a post by a user called ABC in the post she appealed to the captors to release Douglas Wood because he had gone to a/or the Bazaar and bought food for homless people and had provided them with "A-meal". I believe God saw this action too and blessed Douglas Wood with an escape from his captors.
This one is a bit hard to do as a probability. Realy it is an impossibly large probability. Could use number of posts in the world I guess. Which I have no idea of how many there are. So I will do a very conservative estimate.
1/100,000
If you have no idea of the data involved, how on Earth can you consider this a "very conservative estimate"? I simply have to point out the utter arbitrariness of it all, coupled with the fact that these odds are
nine times less than the previous. Conservative, indeed.
At one point in my life I was praying for scientific cures for illnesses like cancer. Because I was on a science kick I thought would it not be fun to create a real life dinosour. I wanted Jesus just for fun to show me how to create a Real Live Dinosaur, he can show us anything you know if he wants, but when I asked him how to start recreating a Dinosaur. Jesus spoke into my head the sentance "I bood", it entered my mind when I was awake, a term I had never heard before. I decieded to look it up on the Internet and I found out the following: You see, the children of Semai are taught from an early age, the concept of "bood." If a parent asks a child to do something and the child replies "I bood," in other words, "I don't feel like doing that," the matter is closed. Bood means gently No.
This one is out of all possible sounds that can be made up by the mind. Which is probably almost limitless. Again I will make an conservative estimate. 1/60,000
Humans can make tens of thousands of single distinct sounds, and the English language alone has 800,000 words. To take the two syllable sentance "I bood" and infer knowledge of some ancient, divine language, is as inane as the
Vicar of Dibley's Alice inferring that her newborn daughter is speaking Old French because she said the word 'goo' (the homonym, 'gue', means 'war' in
old French).
Once again, your probabilities are completely arbtrarty, with no prior justification. Tell me, why didn't you go with your previous "conservative estimate" of 100,000?
One day I was witnessing to a Muslum and he asked me why we ate pork. I used the verse out of the bible which says "It is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man but what comes out of the mouth". After some general discussion I finished for the night. I asked God to give me a verse from the bible to encourage me. I opened the bible at random and selected a random verse. It opened to the exact same verse that I had used with the Muslum. The one about food not defiling. So I knew that God was approving of what I had been talking about.
"What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him "unclean.'"- Mat 15:11
1 / 31,201
See above. You're fallacious assumption is that only one verse out of the whole Bible (i.e., 31,201 verses) satisfies the 'winning' criterion.
Moreover, these four anecdotes fall foul of every single rule for analysing testimony (corroboration, plausibility, statistical likelihood, supporting evidence, etc).
As I've said before, even
if your stories were true, they still fail to arouse suspicion. You can lambaste me with whatever "You close your eyes to the truth!" claims you want, but please, go through the above. My critique is quite objective.
It always amuses me that theists think atheists don't want to admit an all-loving father-god exists. Because that would be just awful...
(1 / 31,201) * (1/928797) * (1/100,000) * (1/60,000) * (1 / 31,201)
The probability of all events in sequence is = 1/5425116657249582000000000
Even this is wrong: the sequence of events is quite irrelevant.
Oh, and there are
31,303 (+137 unnumbered) verses in the Bible, not 31,201.
I also notice you ignored my previous post (apologies if you're still responding to it at time of post).