- May 30, 2020
- 9,760
- 4,407
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He's definitely NOT stupid.I don't believe he means them to be factual statements. I think he throws things out there that he's trying to figure out, hoping someone will come up with something to solve his mystery.
I don't believe he means them to be factual statements. I think he throws things out there that he's trying to figure out, hoping someone will come up with something to solve his mystery.
I agree, which is simultaneously why people keep attempting to communicate and why they get snippy when they are ignored or Gottservant goes back to an earlier point without acknowledging any discussion in between.He's definitely NOT stupid.
He's been on these boards for 16 years. He's not finding.I am sure we will all be relieved when he finds peace over all his seeking
QV please:Really? I guess God wants us to learn something from him. I've lost a lot of brain cells from his posts. I hope they aren't the same one's that I learned from him.
Gottservant, none of my business, but are you a follower of Emmanuel Swedenborg? and/or are you into Swedenborgianism?
Swedenborg was a giant in my estimation. I haven't read his stuff, but I've read about his story and was thoroughly impressed. His work seemed too dense to really approach from a modern day mindset however, so I doubt I will be reading it in future.
Really? I guess God wants us to learn something from him. I've lost a lot of brain cells from his posts. I hope they aren't the same one's that I learned from him.
You mean those peppered moths they glued to a tree?The point is: how do you know if the first Evolution Darwin discovered, was not a false positive?
The point is: how do you know if the first Evolution Darwin discovered, was not a false positive?
Good question. Darwin didn't have much but phenotypes and breeding data to go on. However, genetics, observed evolution, fossil transitionals, evolutionary development, population genetics and biochemistry have all since confirmed Darwin's predictions.
They have confirmed a shift, per species.
Not a bridge between species.
Speciation may be a fact, but I draw the line at the emergence of any new genus.That's wrong. Speciation is well-documented. Even many professional creationists now admit speciation is a fact:
Speciation may be a fact, but I draw the line at the emergence of any new genus.
A dog can be a wolf, a domestic dog, or a coyote.
But a dog can't be a giraffe -- unless it's on paper.
That's wrong. Speciation is well-documented.[...]
Fools put a lot of stuff on paper that passes as truth but, in fact, is science, which can be right or wrong -- usually wrong.And if it's on paper, the fool can't tell the difference!
A butterfly needs a cocoon.
I don't see any cocoons for men, or monkeys.
Does the butterfly having a cocoon, mean that one day other species will too? Not likely?
If humans have hands, does that mean butterflies will have them?
Not likely. Evolution is opportunistic. And mutations don't appear in response to need.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?