Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evolution or descent with modification?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 73873286" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>I thought that you did not believe the flood myth? And don't give me this "screwed up" nonsense unless you can support it. I can see that this went over your head. Populations tend to have quite a few alleles for every genes. Alleles are different variants of gene. For example the gene that determine eye color are alleles. For transplants one looks for as few differences in alleles as possible. Alleles tend to naturally accumulate as time goes on. We can measure how fast they build up. Cheetahs were reduced to a very small population. Since that occurred their population has recovered to an extent, but they have not had enough time to develop the number of alleles that a healthy population has. It is why there existence is still threatened by this ten thousand year old event. If the number of people was reduces to under 10 breeding individuals as occurred to Cheetahs, and that occurred even more recently there would be less differentiation in humans than there are in cheetahs. If the Flood story was true, that the human population was reduced to 8 people, only six of which were breeding, then transplants should not be the problem that they are today.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 73873286, member: 321072"] I thought that you did not believe the flood myth? And don't give me this "screwed up" nonsense unless you can support it. I can see that this went over your head. Populations tend to have quite a few alleles for every genes. Alleles are different variants of gene. For example the gene that determine eye color are alleles. For transplants one looks for as few differences in alleles as possible. Alleles tend to naturally accumulate as time goes on. We can measure how fast they build up. Cheetahs were reduced to a very small population. Since that occurred their population has recovered to an extent, but they have not had enough time to develop the number of alleles that a healthy population has. It is why there existence is still threatened by this ten thousand year old event. If the number of people was reduces to under 10 breeding individuals as occurred to Cheetahs, and that occurred even more recently there would be less differentiation in humans than there are in cheetahs. If the Flood story was true, that the human population was reduced to 8 people, only six of which were breeding, then transplants should not be the problem that they are today. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evolution or descent with modification?
Top
Bottom