Evolution is proven false!

[Sofaman]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

 

[lewiscalledhimmaster]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

This is priceless.













Anyone for bacon?

 

[Sofaman]

Anyone?

 

[EternalDragon]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

Whoo boy! Just look around.

This is like asking for evidence of mankind on earth.

 

[lewiscalledhimmaster]

Anyone?

 

[Davian]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

This is priceless.

You never know. It would be a first, but there may be someone that has evidence for a creator or intelligent designer that doesn't have a more parsimonious explanation.

 

[lewiscalledhimmaster]

If popcorn could corn pop, how much pop could popcorn corn, if popcorn could pop corn?

 

[Metal Minister]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

Sure, it's right next to that incontrovertible evidence of abiogenesis!

 

[Metal Minister]

This is priceless.

Anyone for bacon?

Sure, I'll have some! Bacon is good!

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

Uh . . . . you left out some of the steps in your proof.

 

[SkyWriting]

Now give us your evidence for either a creator or intelligent designer please

All natural laws oppose life. None has been found anywhere nor any
laws of nature are known that point to life or give reason why it would
occur. All laws point to increasing disorder and loss of useful energy
eventually leading to heat death of the universe.

Only intelligence can create order and information systems out of chaos.
No intelligent systems are known to create higher intelligence through offspring.
All information systems are faulty and erode the original information
and are subject to error, degradation of the information, and energy loss.

Energy must be conserved and looses usefulness in any reactions.

These issues all suggest an great intelligence and source of energy
greater that the created result, our Cosmos.

What exactly is the heat death of the universe and where can I find out more?



Happy to help!

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

All natural laws oppose life.

Actually, all natural laws allow life. So all conclusions based on this premise are false.

None has been found anywhere nor any
laws of nature are known that point to life or give reason why it would
occur.

Hey, I know about a whole lot of life all over the planet. How can you say none has been found?

All laws point to increasing disorder and loss of useful energy
eventually leading to heat death of the universe.

But that's not incompatable with life, or else we wouldn't be here.

Only intelligence can create order and information systems out of chaos.

Ho hum yet another pronouncement without any reason for it. I reject that axiom and so all conclusions from that axiom can also be rejected.

No intelligent systems are known to create higher intelligence through offspring.

Well, actually, biological evolution provides exactly that. Are you under the impression, for example, that Steven Hawking was'nt actually smarter than his parents?

All information systems are faulty and erode the original information
and are subject to error, degradation of the information, and energy loss.

except information can be added to, repaired.

Energy must be conserved and looses usefulness in any reactions.
These issues all suggest an great intelligence and source of energy
greater that the created result, our Cosmos.

Nothing about the evolution of life on earth requires violating conservation of energy. In fact, the earth has been receiving adequate energy to support life from the sun ever since life first arrived on earth.

 

[Davian]

All natural laws oppose life. None has been found anywhere nor any
laws of nature are known that point to life or give reason why it would
occur. All laws point to increasing disorder and loss of useful energy
eventually leading to heat death of the universe.

Only intelligence can create order and information systems out of chaos.
No intelligent systems are known to create higher intelligence through offspring.
All information systems are faulty and erode the original information
and are subject to error, degradation of the information, and energy loss.

Energy must be conserved and looses usefulness in any reactions.

These issues all suggest an great intelligence and source of energy
greater that the created result, our Cosmos.

What exactly is the heat death of the universe and where can I find out more?



Happy to help!

 

[Davian]

You never know. It would be a first, but there may be someone that has evidence for a creator or intelligent designer that doesn't have a more parsimonious explanation.

If popcorn could corn pop, how much pop could popcorn corn, if popcorn could pop corn?

No evidence then?

 

[SkyWriting]

Nothing about the evolution of life on earth requires violating conservation of energy. In fact, the earth has been receiving adequate energy to support life from the sun ever since life first arrived on earth.

The cosmos is not the same as the earth.
At least we don't currently thin' that way.

What source of energy produced the cosmos?

 

[SkyWriting]

I didn't catch that. What was the source of energy for the cosmos again?

 

[Strathos]

The cosmos is not the same as the earth.
At least we don't currently thin' that way.

What source of energy produced the cosmos?

God.

If that's the only question you have a problem with, and this answer is acceptable, then I guess you accept evolution, right?

 

[SkyWriting]

Actually, all natural laws allow life. So all conclusions based on this premise are false.

Check the other planets, my friend.
The rest of the cosmos follows he rules that exterminate life
in a new york minute.

 

[SkyWriting]

God.

If that's the only question you have a problem with, and this answer is acceptable, then I guess you accept evolution, right?

Evolution and change is a provable fact.

Ever since I watched 12 ducklings in a family become
2 ducklings in 6 hours, I've considered that the lucky ones
will reproduce more than the lost ones. Things change.

 

[SkyWriting]

Are you under the impression, for example, that Steven Hawking was'nt actually smarter than his parents?

He likely inherited his disease or it was a recombination error from his parents DNA.
His parents were both scholars.