VirOptimus
A nihilist who cares.
I'm not angry, but its very tiresome when the other person doesnt understand that which is debated and furthermore, isnt interested in learning either.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And why are you evolutionists so very angry? Why can you not just allow people to differ from you? Why must you always end with name calling?
And why are you evolutionists so very angry? Why can you not just allow people to differ from you? Why must you always end with name calling?
Oh, and the reason my cosmological question affects biological evolution is that the idea you all found everything on is that life began somehow magically out of nothing, or mabye a big bang, or we're not really sure how. If you don't know where life came from in the first place, how is there life? The idea you proport is that the life came from something organic, which evolved into life, which then evolved into more life and so on. How does that start out of nothing?
God, that's how. You may not believe in Him, but He believes in you. There is no other reasonable explanation for how the universe began besides God, or some call it intelligent design, though that's because they're afraid of being jumped on by the science crowd. But you do not believe because you choose not to (I've heard that accusation flying the other way, so I guess it's a viable argument, eh).
Hahahahaha, and your point is? Are we not talking about evolution? The bones you show is still human, I can go and jump in the grave yard and I am sure I will find a few human bones!
Not seeing the proof here of anything. Skulls that look human, but could be the human skull of a deformed person do not prove anything. where is the rest of the evidence, the details sir?
You're pictures prove absolutely nothing, without hard information and clear evidence of exactly how this lifeform changed from one thing to another, these are still just pictures.
If there is such hard proof, then there should be museums, or labs where one can go and see the hard proof, all layed out in a logical order. None of the proofs should be man-made. The processes and changes of the being should be quite evident and each one thoroughly explained so that the students you're trying so hard to convince can clearly see what is going on.
Instead, what happens, you take young students, or older students, set them in front of educated professors with intelligent sounding language and tell them that what you believe is true is actually true. They believe you because you have many sets of letters after your name to prove that you know what you are talking about.
Can't you see that none of this proves anything? It's simply so many men and women talking about what they think is true, and you call anyone who dares disagrees with you an uneducated moron, but you still cannot answer the foundational questions.
As another fellow asked, where are the not so old bones?
Remember, I'm an uneducated moron so I need you to show me the simple things here.
Right, because scientific method is the only possible way to have any knowledge. You know absolutely everything you know because you learned it from the scientific method, is that right?
Once again, using offensive language. If this is an honest discussion, then why is it so necessary to couch every comment in this type of language?
Do you truly believe that people are complete idiots who do not agree with you about the THEORY of evolution? I guess must have Darwin's contemporaries must have been morons too. They couldn't possibly have been thinking people with a different conclusion to the evidence at hand.
Oh, and the reason my cosmological question affects biological evolution is that the idea you all found everything on is that life began somehow magically out of nothing, or mabye a big bang, or we're not really sure how.
If you don't know where life came from in the first place, how is there life?
The idea you proport is that the life came from something organic, which evolved into life, which then evolved into more life and so on. How does that start out of nothing?
God, that's how.
You may not believe in Him, but He believes in you. There is no other reasonable explanation for how the universe began besides God, or some call it intelligent design, though that's because they're afraid of being jumped on by the science crowd.
But you do not believe because you choose not to (I've heard that accusation flying the other way, so I guess it's a viable argument, eh).
If I provide the details you ask for, where's the snowball's chance in hades you'll actually read it?
Considering only something like 17% of the general public can read and understand scientific research literature, I seriously doubt Creationists compose any part of that segment. So I'm going to guess "none"
And why are you evolutionists so very angry? Why can you not just allow people to differ from you? Why must you always end with name calling?
I don't believe I have ever seen a thread filled with so many tired old arguments. At least AV keeps us on our toes changing definitions of words every once an a while, but really Ursie, come up with something that hasn't been refuted umteen trillion times in the past. A good start would be arguing something that you didn't read off of a creationist propaganda site.
Just to clear something. Ignorant is not an insult, it simply means you don't know. I am ignorant as to what you had for breakfast this morning. I am ignorant I'm sure as to how you do your job, and you are ignorant of some aspects of evolution. No one is insulting you, they are just pointing out that many of the questions you ask come from ignorance of the theory, again, not stupidity, just lacking knowledge.And why are you evolutionists so very angry? Why can you not just allow people to differ from you? Why must you always end with name calling?
Look, no offense, but I'm not going to pander to willful ignorance. The fossils exist, they have been dated as existing sequentially, and they display change in form. We know mutations lead to novel phenotypes, therefore it was Evolution.
And.... They are. Are you joking? I saw Lucy, Australiopithecus in person a year ago.
Oh Lord have mercy.... are you seriously going down the wild-eyed conspiracy path. Please stop now, while you at least sound vaguely sane.
They are.
Um, we believe them because we can actually understand the material and evidences presented, unlike you. You are being incredibly rude. Before you take on your martyred air, please remember that you are the one accusing us of being liars and gullible.
I just did. You simply did not have the requisite level of elementary education to comprehend it, which I think is unfortunate and evidence that our public schools need an overhaul
Why bother? If evolution is true for one species, it is true for all species.
I'm going to be honest, if you believe that you are flat out ignorant. We know a great deal.
That is science. Unlike religion, it makes no claim to mystical infallibility and perfection. This is a common mistake Creationists make in assuming that a laboratory is like a church.
I already did. I really don't know how I can dumb it down any further, to be honest.
Not absolutely everything. Only religion makes claims like that. Stop putting words in my mouth. Its annoying, and against forum rules.
Because your claim that transitional fossils don't exist is absurd.
Just ignorant.
Hardly. There you go, goading and flaming again.
A conclusion that was falsified decades ago.
Well, I wanted to give you all a scapegoat, someone you can feel good about calling an idiot. If no one disagreed with you, you'd be an awefully bored lot.
Well, I wanted to give you all a scapegoat, someone you can feel good about calling an idiot. If no one disagreed with you, you'd be an awefully bored lot.
I believe you are a Christian, if you are, you must also believe that the Bible is the Word of God and with no lies right?
Explain to me how evolution supports God's Word in this Scripture..
-"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."
-"But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE."
-"For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man."
-"Even every one that is called by my name: for I have created him for my glory, I have formed him; yea, I have made him."
-Then God said, Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our
likeness.
You said you wanted photos. I provided it. Are you now moving the goal post? What do you consider to be evidence? I have seen this before where no amount of evidence is sufficent for creationists. What ends up happening is they are not educated enough or too ignorant enough to recognize or understand the evidence when its presented. Im not just talking about my post mind youNot seeing the proof here of anything. Skulls that look human, but could be the human skull of a deformed person do not prove anything. where is the rest of the evidence, the details sir?
Yes, but we become even more bored when someone disagrees with us in exactly the same way as everyone else without moving a finger to learn about the others position.Well, I wanted to give you all a scapegoat, someone you can feel good about calling an idiot. If no one disagreed with you, you'd be an awefully bored lot.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?