Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then you'd better start rethinking:Going into denial might help too --- just pretend it isn't a dinosaur.
Hahahahahahahahaha, how refreshing, people of 2000 years ago includes dinosaurs in their art, I guess they saw the dinosaurs on National Geographic?But what is interesting is that the dino fossils found in that area is the same as the dinos on the artifacts, so much for creativity.....
Evolution is a fact?
I have a question too evolutionists....how is it possible to find authentic artifacts of thousands of years old that shows that dinosaurs were part of their culture/man?
I am pretty sure they did not have the science and imagination of that of modern evolutionists......
Ooparts & Ancient High Technology--Evidence of Noah's Flood?-Literature, Art & History Crawling with Dinosaurs
This really makes evolution look stupid!
Probably the same thing you are: nothing.
It's not my job to go around with a clipboard falsifying and confirming things.
That's not my calling.
Well, let's see --- first you find a nest of bones.Has our resident crop of creationists forgotten how it is that we know that dinosaurs existed in the first place?
It is true, science and creationism start with very different suppositions. Science starts with the fact that the universe really exists, can be accurately observed and measured, and that we can make accurate predictions about it. Creationism starts with the supposition that a 2000 year old is true and should be interpreted literally no matter what reality tells us. Guess which one gives us more useful answers?I guess it all depends or your presuppositions. For it is not the similarities that will cause the right conclusion. But the differences.
The Ica Stones have been proven to be a complete hoax created by Basilio Uschuya. He admitted so in several interviews. By your logic this proves that all of Creationism is wrong. I win!I have a question too evolutionists....how is it possible to find authentic artifacts of thousands of years old that shows that dinosaurs were part of their culture/man?
I am pretty sure they did not have the science and imagination of that of modern evolutionists......
Ooparts & Ancient High Technology--Evidence of Noah's Flood?-Literature, Art & History Crawling with Dinosaurs
This really makes evolution look stupid!
Well, let's see --- first you find a nest of bones.
Then you assemble them into something.
Then you call this something a "terrible lizard".
From there, you build a whole world full of these things meandering around all over everywhere.
Then you realize that, since you called it a lizard, it can't have a navel.
Thus Behemoth in the Bible gets plutoed because it doesn't fit the computer model of a dinosaur.
Did I peg that right?
(I can easily get you guys to pluto other dinosaurs by simply stating that one flew past my window; then watch the plutoing begin as you scramble to hold on to your sacred belief that dinosaurs and man never co-existed.)
(I can easily get you guys to pluto other dinosaurs by simply stating that one flew past my window; then watch the plutoing begin as you scramble to hold on to your sacred belief that dinosaurs and man never co-existed.)
Well, let's see --- first you find a nest of bones.
Then you assemble them into something.
Then you call this something a "terrible lizard".
From there, you build a whole world full of these things meandering around all over everywhere.
Then you realize that, since you called it a lizard, it can't have a navel.
Thus Behemoth in the Bible gets plutoed because it doesn't fit the computer model of a dinosaur.
Did I peg that right?
(I can easily get you guys to pluto other dinosaurs by simply stating that one flew past my window; then watch the plutoing begin as you scramble to hold on to your sacred belief that dinosaurs and man never co-existed.)
You have shown once again your penchant for sophistry and word games. Non-avain dinosaurs did not live with man. Period. Done. T rex, Triceratops, Stegasaurus, Apatasaurus and Velociraptors did not exist at the same time as man did. Is that "plutoed" enough for you? Are you sure you were never a Pharasee?
"Pluto" is now a verb.I think you're using the term "pluto" a bit uncharitably.
Good --- since you don't like Phariseeism, I take it you're willing to realize that there just might be an exception to lizards having navels?Btw, I don't need to think you need to resort to past lives to think of someone as a Pharisee.
Their "leaven" is still alive and kicking, so to speak.
Good --- since you don't like Phariseeism, I take it you're willing to realize that there just might be an exception to lizards having navels?
If not --- then I'll stick with the "leaven" that the Bible pwns evolution back to where it came from.
Sure. You are adept at repeating yourself over and over, even when clearly demonstrated to be wrong.You guys go ahead and talk yourselves out of the points I made.
I'll be glad to restate them later as the need arises.
The Bible says nothing about dinosaurs. Show me where the Bibel uses the word "dinosaur."I'll say it again: the Bible portrays a dinosaur as having a navel, and if a dinosaur having a navel is sufficient to falsify evolution, then I'll consider evolution falsified.
And all Christians are vampires becasue they drink Christ's blood. Those of you who don't believe that can hardly ignore thus post.Those of you who don't believe Behemoth was a dinosaur can kindly ignore this post.
Why not? You repeat your mistakes over and over instead of correcting them. And you are somekind of authority on the Bible?I'm sure we'll be discussing it aplenty in upcoming threads.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?