Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't understand what you're saying, Think.The position that you are implying is not technically a Christian position.
Evolution right:It's always sad that the people who demonstrably have the least knowledge about evolution are the ones who are most confident about it being wrong.
It's always sad that the people who demonstrably have the least knowledge about evolution are the ones who are most confident about it being wrong.
Yup -- like dismissing as false the Creation Week, the Flood, the Exodus, the Virgin Birth, Resurrection -- just to name a very few -- is very foolish.Dismissing as false something one knows nothing about is sad, sure. But also very foolish.
You misunderstand. The field of abiogenesis is the study of the possible origins of life. There is a variety of ideas for how it may have happened and a great deal of progress has been made in working out and demonstrating possible stages and parts of that process.In other words, your camp has absolutely NO CLUE how life began besides God's Creation. You just tell a story about what happened AFTER the most critical part.
If you mean the big bang, that's not the claim. Again, it would help if you knew the basics of what you want to argue about. Try this: Big Bang - Wikipedia.That's about as good as "Once upon a time there was nothing ... THEN IT EXPLODED AND BECAME EVERYTHING!!!"
Yes, but this discussion is about 'creation and evolution', not 'creation and abiogenesis'. Evolution does not explain how life came about, it explains how life became diversified after it came about. That's what matters in this discussion.I made my point very clear. Abiogenesis is a PART of the science that explains how all of life came about. Call it whatever you like, it is the complete opposite of Creationism.
And very obvious. I can never understand why someone would expose their ignorance in that way. One should expose ones ignorance as part of the process of removing it, not as a way of reinforcing it.Dismissing as false something one knows nothing about
is sad, sure. But also very foolish
What about those who, despite the fact that they can hardly spell the word, agree wholeheartedly? are they sheeple?Attacks on evolution that assert "It just ain't so" are pointless and, if repeated incessantly become fatuous, or worse.
There has never once been found, and thoroughly documented, an animal in a state of transition between 'kinds'. Animals evolve within their 'kinds.' NONE evolve from one 'kind' to another 'kind.'
In depth DNA research proves that it is absolutely impossible.
It has never happened. Ever.
It's an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.It's always sad that the people who demonstrably have the least knowledge about evolution are the ones who are most confident about it being wrong.
I didn't say that.False.
Non-life doesn't appear into a multi-celled organism in a trillion trillion spontaneous chance scenarios.
Fail.
In other words, your camp has absolutely NO CLUE how life began besides God's Creation. You just tell a story about what happened AFTER the most critical part.
That's about as good as "Once upon a time there was nothing ... THEN IT EXPLODED AND BECAME EVERYTHING!!!"
I made my point very clear. Abiogenesis is a PART of the science that explains how all of life came about. Call it whatever you like, it is the complete opposite of Creationism. And that's what matters in this discussion.
I didn't say that.
I was talking about single celled life to complex life... which is what you were bringing up.
The transition of lifeless chemistry to very simple life is mysterious... but also irrelevant to the evidence for the evolution and diversity of life.
Even Theistic Evolutionists have to admit God was original creator of Universe and of lifeIn other words, your camp has absolutely NO CLUE how life began besides God's Creation. You just tell a story about what happened AFTER the most critical part.
That's about as good as "Once upon a time there was nothing ... THEN IT EXPLODED AND BECAME EVERYTHING!!!"
I made my point very clear. Abiogenesis is a PART of the science that explains how all of life came about. Call it whatever you like, it is the complete opposite of Creationism. And that's what matters in this discussion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?