- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,999
- 52,622
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's very exotic encountering people who do and take it so seriously.
LOL -- methinks Mr Ussher, et alii, would have something to say about that.
So would Luke.
When I vanish in a poof you will knowLOL - I am sure they are all models of propriety. I am not aware of any atheist who has been 'moderated'.
For me, being an Australian atheist on CF is sometimes an occupational hazard due to cultural misunderstandings.
OB
LOL - I am sure they are all models of propriety. I am not aware of any atheist who has been 'moderated'.
For me, being an Australian atheist on CF is sometimes an occupational hazard due to cultural misunderstandings.
OB
Perfection is difficult
When I vanish in a poof you will know
I've been modulated despite my being what
I consider a model of probity.
It's routine with God.
You often use god for justifying your view
Could it be my standards?
Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.
No… you are greedy for perfection
This kind?
Under what circumstances do you contradict the phone book? or a user manual? or a math test?
I don't have to prove anything to you. Nor do I have to defend Hugh Ross. If he makes more sense to me than to do, then that is the way it is. If you think he lacks credibility, you have every right to think that. But I am not beholding to you in any way. You are not a mentor for me that I have to justify to you what views I put or where I get them from. If you are going to exert some sort of authority that makes you think I have to answer to you for my views, then that ends our discussion.Perhaps you are too busy to respond to the very
specific things Ive asked.
Helpful if you did.
Like the, " does that seem reasonable?"
I'm notcgiing to watch a video. That is not reasonable.
I don't discuss things with videos.
If you have a topic yourself, I may be interested to look at it.
Initially, I saw you saying ( very general)things like that science increasingly proves the Bible.
Which I thought remarkable as the opposite is the case
with the " big ticket" items. LIke, say, flood.
Of course prosaic stuff like geography and some
individuals names check out.
I don't know what your non prsctiing astrophysicist
says about evolution. Just saw he rejects it.
Fine. But he has no facts.* Just opinions.
ie twaddle.
I dont know why anyone is attracted to that.
Do you?
* just as if he - doing no research in biology etc
would make the greatest discovery in history, being
the disproof of evolution and, of course, proof of god.
Where's the data? The Nobel?
Seriously?
You know resesrch " due diligence"
Apply it now.
Who are "the rest of us"? I don't care if you take me seriously or not. You are not my teacher and I am not your student, so come down from where you are at and engage in a proper discussion about young verse old earth creation without making it personal. Otherwise, I am out of your loop." Might" have gotten it wrong?
Might have?
If like the rest of us you like to be taken
seriously you have to do better than that.
I don't care. The point is that humans do not descend from primates. The first humans, Adam and Eve were created as brand new adult human beings and did not evolve from any previous population of half human primates.That's kind of a big if, since you're not sure whether it's a plant or a cockroach that we're more closely related to than a chimpanzee. (and in fact, whichever one you finally decide on... it's just not true.)
I don't have to prove anything to you. Nor do I have to defend Hugh Ross. If he makes more sense to me than to do, then that is the way it is. If you think he lacks credibility, you have every right to think that. But I am not beholding to you in any way. You are not a mentor for me that I have to justify to you what views I put or where I get them from. If you are going to exert some sort of authority that makes you think I have to answer to you for my views, then that ends our discussion.
I guess you're exempt. How lucky you must be.It's always good to have a teachable spirit.
"That's kind of a big if, since you're not sure whether it's a plant or a cockroach that we're more closely related to than a chimpanzee. (and in fact, whichever one you finally decide on... it's just not true.)"Isn't it interesting that in every thread dealing with creation verse evolution, the personal hate speech tends to emerge when people cannot find a satisfactory answer to points put forward by the opposition in a debate.
The point is that humans do not descend from primates.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?