Schroeder wrote:
No i did not (listen to any of the sermons that are the topic of this thread - my add.). dont have time to do it. just throwing in my two sense.
Is it a good idea, generally, to look into the topic of a thread before posting to it?
did all this reading and such awhile ago.
That's always a good start, if the sources are reliable, and especially if you read (
and understood) more from the other side than your own. As a good faith gesture, perhaps you could answer some very basic questions, like naming four different fields that scientists say give evidence in support of evolution, and perhaps the approximate number of amphibian species that suddenly appeared in the Cambrian Explosion?
So saying in a loose way that all animals have exsisted in their present form since the beginning means they dont believe in evolution or speciation. HARDLY.
Um, yes, that's exactly what that means. If evolution happens, then by definition all animals aren't in the same form they were "since the beginning". How could they still be in the same form they were "since the beginning" if they are changing over time?
I know thats what you lkike to here. but i dont seet he guestion or how it was worded or how they actually answered it.
I'm sorry, I didn't understand that.
Its a bit BROAD. and i cannot imagine why. If its worded in a way that evolution MEANS evolution theory i see how they answer that way. again al in how the guestion is asked etc. but in the end you hear what you want to hear. SO your PROOF is weak. just like the theory.
The question seems to have directly asked exactly what you wanted - whether or not animals have changed over time (evolution). How would you word that question, in a concise and survey-usable way?
nice but your the one makeing it so. distorting polls which are weak anyways.
I'm sorry that reporting poll data bothered you. I didn't distort any poll - I reported exactly what it found, and it asked exactly what you wanted, did it not?
i drive a school bus so it is at times, or at least some of the kids are a pain.
Hey, good to see that you'll at least be getting some time off for the holidays.
I am a creationist so i wasnt really saying they were funny.
Oh, sorry. Which type? Old earth? Young earth? Gap? Day-age? Two human creations (like Whirlwind)? Hyper evolution? Intelligent Design (which often allows for human evolution from apes)? Kind> species?
Blessings-
Papias
P.S., for Greg:
First, Greg, to show that you are actually interested in the the topic of this thread, would you like to tell us how many of the interviews you listened to, and which ideas in them you found most and least inspiring? I'm sure you've learned about a thread before posting to it.