Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why don't you give me an expert on diet and we will take a look at what you recommend. I will go by your expertise, can you handle your assignment?Who are these experts? Where are the scientific studies backing their claims?
Why don't you give me an expert on diet and we will take a look at what you recommend. I will go by your expertise, can you handle your assignment?
What is ridiculous is that science can not agree among themselves what a good diet is. For a long time (FDR) the government has to step in to pull the reigns back on science to keep them from harming people with the junk garbage food they are trying to feeding the American public. Look at the Atkins diet for example. They want high protein high fat and low carbs. Other experts claim we need just the opposite a high carb low fat diet. There does not seem to be any sort of agreement.
Who do you think works for those corporations? Bozo the clown? Not only do they hire science to produce the food, they use science to sell the food and convince people that something harmful to their health is good for them. If anyone can straighten this out it is the evolutionist but you fumbled the ball. Your theory does not seem to have any practical application in the real world. Nutritionists seem to be doing their fair share, still there is controversy and lack agreement among them. The people that make the most difference are the coronary doctors because they can check to see if people are getting better or worse on different diets. So if evolution has practical application then produce your diet and we will give it to the coronary expert to test to see if you can reverse heart disease or not. This is very simple, feed the diabetic your diet and then lets check his blood sugar to see if it improves or gets worse. As a evolutionist what do you recommend? What did we evolve to eat? (yes there is a high correlation between heart disease and diabetics because they both show improvement with diet.)I thought corporations were feeding people these foods, not science.
You are quote mining, and doing so badly. Abiogenesis is not a theory of spontaneous generation. It is a pre-biotic theory involving complex chemistry reactions as a precursor for life, i.e. it is a theory of chemical evolution that ultimately led to life and biological evolution of cells. That is what the 'a' stands for in a-biogenesis, i.e it is theory of that which was before the begging of life.
How you get a natural explanation to be the same as spontaneous generation is beyond me.
No, the only one lost here is you if you do not realize that before life there must be a precursor to life that was non life - something simpler than life.
To draw an analog: you are chemicals collected from the environment. Before your mother was was born, you was not a living creature, not even a cell, "you" did not even exist (at they very least there is nothing that even sightly indicates that this would be the case). In a sense "you" was spread out in nature all over the place as lifeless molecules. At the time you was formed in your mother womb all these chemical that are "you" were assembled from the environment to form you - and this still goes on in everyone of us - about every 7th year you have replace every molecule in your body. So who are "you"? Definitley not the same matter as you was 7 years ago. None of these chemical you are made of can be said to have been "you" or to be alive or be life by them self. This implies you are created from non-life! You, yourself, was actually formed from none-life - and still are every 7th year. So what is the big deal here - why do you make such a big fuzz about (prebiotic) chemistry?
The same way everything else exists. From breed mating with breed producing new breeds (variation) within the species.
Yes there can be some variation. I am only asking for if the theory of evolution can tell us if we should be on a high fat low carb diet or a high carb low fat diet. Can they contribute to the discussion that science is having on this subject right now?The person sitting on the couch all day, is not going to benefit from the same diet a marathon runner would need who runs 60 miles a week.
Who do you think works for those corporations? Bozo the clown?
Not only do they hire science to produce the food, they use science to sell the food and convince people that something harmful to their health is good for them.
Your theory does not seem to have any practical application in the real world.
Yes there can be some variation. I am only asking for if the theory of evolution can tell us if we should be on a high fat low carb diet or a high carb low fat diet. Can they contribute to the discussion that science is having on this subject right now?
My son is in the marching band so of course they want to balance his electrolytes where they may not be an issue for people that do not exert themselves they way younger people do. That is more fine tuning then anything else. Although if a band director is worth anything then he should be able to recommend the best diet and how to keep people from dehydration.
Not very long ago they gave the sports team a high fat high protein diet before the big game. Now they are recommending a high carb diet. Perhaps we should be grateful that science is no longer giving out bad advise and they have come so far from where they were last Thursday. Although Dr Atkins still seems to still be popular even though the Wall Street Journal gave details from Dr. Atkins's confidential medical report. The report concludes that Dr. Atkins, 72, had a history of heart attack and congestive heart failure and notes that he weighed 258 pounds at death.
http://authoritynutrition.com/23-studies-on-low-carb-and-low-fat-diets/Still not seeing a single reference to a scientific paper in a peer review journal. Where is the science?
Yes there can be some variation. I am only asking for if the theory of evolution can tell us if we should be on a high fat low carb diet or a high carb low fat diet. Can they contribute to the discussion that science is having on this subject right now?
My son is in the marching band so of course they want to balance his electrolytes where they may not be an issue for people that do not exert themselves they way younger people do. That is more fine tuning then anything else. Although if a band director is worth anything then he should be able to recommend the best diet and how to keep people from dehydration.
Not very long ago they gave the sports team a high fat high protein diet before the big game. Now they are recommending a high carb diet. Perhaps we should be grateful that science is no longer giving out bad advise and they have come so far from where they were last Thursday. Although Dr Atkins still seems to still be popular even though the Wall Street Journal on gave details from Dr. Atkins's confidential medical report. The report concludes that Dr. Atkins, 72, had a history of heart attack and congestive heart failure and notes that he weighed 258 pounds at death.
So you admit then that science is being used to kill people not help them. How is science good when they have cause so much mass destruction?Actually, yes.
The goal of a corporation is to make money, not make sure people get a healthy meal. You do know this, right?
They use science to develop foods that will make them the most money, and then they hire advertising agencies to sell it to the public.
Why do they have a new flu vaccine every year? How do they develop that flu vaccine? Ever looked into that?
So you admit then that science is being used to kill people not help them. How is science good when they have cause so much mass destruction?
"A study in the January issue of Pediatrics was unable to find a correlation between influenza vaccination rates for children under 5 years old and a decline in children hospitalized for influenza-related illness.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Pediatrics/Vaccines/48976
Missing the point - with purpose - do we?
The point is - yangi is clearly half bird (wings feathers etc but n beak) and half dinosaur (moth with teth, claws and tail) - i.e. yangi is the beautiful example of a tspeciemnt we need to explain but the progressive ranstional species between bird and dinosaur YEC's always been asking for.
The problem with yangi (for YEC's) is that is a dinosaur with modern bird feathers. If it wasn't it for this YEC's would call it a dinosaur. But since birds has feathers and this fossil obviously has feathers andy YEC need to say it is bird - despite it has a tail, claw and mouth full of teeth - unless the like to called a fool by their own as well. This why it so hilarious when YEC call this as bird.
If we go backward in time we see less birdlike and more dinosaur like transitional creatures (called dinosaurs by YEC's) and if we go forward in time we see more birdlike and less dinosaur like transitional creature (called birds by YEC's).
So not only do we have a single sepciment we need to explain but the whole chain of progressive changes over time from one form to another form, in YEC's words, we need to explain the change form one kind to another kind. How is this possible if micro evolution only is supposed to create a variaty within the same kind?
So the question is; are maniraptors and bird the same kind or not? Are maniraptors the same kind as Therapoda or not? Where do w
No yangi is a beautiful example of this:
http://bestpets.biz/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/dog-breeding.jpg
What happened to all the lineages from when dinosaurs were reptilian?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?