Evolution and Abortion
If you believe in Evolution and you understand its fundament principals then you may know that the instinct to reproduce is a driving force in Evolution. In Evolution the instinct to reproduce may be greater then any other instinct. Jerome Lejeune, a professor of fundamental genetics in Paris and a pioneer in detecting chromosomal diseases, said to a Senate committee: "Life has a very, very long history but each individual has a very neat beginning, the moment of its conception. When the 23 chromosomes from the father and the 23 chromosomes from the mother are combined at conception, that cell now represents an entirely new individual and is not just a part of the mother's body. Sixty prominent physicians recently presented a declaration of biological facts proving that a child in the womb is conclusively a living human being. These doctors include Drs. Hofmeister and Schmidt, past presidents of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Dr. Joseph Faley, past president of the American Academy of Neurology; and Dr. Bernard Nathanson, formerly one of the leading abortionists in America. These doctors stated: "The developing foetus is human, with human genetic composition. As clearly demonstrated by in vitro (dish) fertilization, so also in vivo (womb), the embryo is alive, human, and unique in the special environmental support required for that stage of human development. Is Abortion just a result of forty years of psychological conditioning? The scientific and medical community agree about the foetus being human life, all agreeing that life begins at conception. And if you believe that humans are a product of Evolution then maybe you can try and explain why woman kill there own babies. All intelligent people understand that Abortion is murder .Abortion is in direct contradiction to the Evolutionary instinct to reproduce. Evolution is concerned with the idea of building for future generations. As a professor at Emory University summarized, unbridled self-indulgence on the part of one generation without regard to a future generation, is to be regarded as irrational behaviour in terms of biological evolution. This premise arose from a scientific idea that one could determine evolutionary history by studying the development of the foetus. Are women who have Abortions just mentally ill? For example, human life begins with a single cell and then multiplies in complexity. During one stage, the human foetus has so-called "gill slits" that seem to represent the "fish stage" in human development. Next, the foetus seems to have a tail segment similar to reptiles, and the yolk sac seems similar to bird evolution. Thus, the development of the foetus has appeared to some scientists as a mere reflection of how humans supposedly developed from lower animal forms. This idea was widely taught even at the beginning of this decade. Even though this evolutionary idea of foetal development has been scientifically disproved, the notion still seems to prevail. A closer examination of this premise reveals scientific error, however. The "gill slits," or pharyngeal pouches, actually become the thymus gland, the parathyroid, and the middle ear canals. The "tail", or coccyx, is a point of muscle attachment at the tailbone, and the yolk sac produces the first blood cells. All of these morphological phenomena are necessary stages in normal human development. The abortionists' justification for the termination of human life has been completely invalidated by scientific evidence. Evolution is concerned with the idea of future generations. As John Wilke has stated, "In truth we did not come from a single cell. Rather, each of us once was a single cell; and all we have done since then has been growing.
If you believe in Evolution and you understand its fundament principals then you may know that the instinct to reproduce is a driving force in Evolution. In Evolution the instinct to reproduce may be greater then any other instinct. Jerome Lejeune, a professor of fundamental genetics in Paris and a pioneer in detecting chromosomal diseases, said to a Senate committee: "Life has a very, very long history but each individual has a very neat beginning, the moment of its conception. When the 23 chromosomes from the father and the 23 chromosomes from the mother are combined at conception, that cell now represents an entirely new individual and is not just a part of the mother's body. Sixty prominent physicians recently presented a declaration of biological facts proving that a child in the womb is conclusively a living human being. These doctors include Drs. Hofmeister and Schmidt, past presidents of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Dr. Joseph Faley, past president of the American Academy of Neurology; and Dr. Bernard Nathanson, formerly one of the leading abortionists in America. These doctors stated: "The developing foetus is human, with human genetic composition. As clearly demonstrated by in vitro (dish) fertilization, so also in vivo (womb), the embryo is alive, human, and unique in the special environmental support required for that stage of human development. Is Abortion just a result of forty years of psychological conditioning? The scientific and medical community agree about the foetus being human life, all agreeing that life begins at conception. And if you believe that humans are a product of Evolution then maybe you can try and explain why woman kill there own babies. All intelligent people understand that Abortion is murder .Abortion is in direct contradiction to the Evolutionary instinct to reproduce. Evolution is concerned with the idea of building for future generations. As a professor at Emory University summarized, unbridled self-indulgence on the part of one generation without regard to a future generation, is to be regarded as irrational behaviour in terms of biological evolution. This premise arose from a scientific idea that one could determine evolutionary history by studying the development of the foetus. Are women who have Abortions just mentally ill? For example, human life begins with a single cell and then multiplies in complexity. During one stage, the human foetus has so-called "gill slits" that seem to represent the "fish stage" in human development. Next, the foetus seems to have a tail segment similar to reptiles, and the yolk sac seems similar to bird evolution. Thus, the development of the foetus has appeared to some scientists as a mere reflection of how humans supposedly developed from lower animal forms. This idea was widely taught even at the beginning of this decade. Even though this evolutionary idea of foetal development has been scientifically disproved, the notion still seems to prevail. A closer examination of this premise reveals scientific error, however. The "gill slits," or pharyngeal pouches, actually become the thymus gland, the parathyroid, and the middle ear canals. The "tail", or coccyx, is a point of muscle attachment at the tailbone, and the yolk sac produces the first blood cells. All of these morphological phenomena are necessary stages in normal human development. The abortionists' justification for the termination of human life has been completely invalidated by scientific evidence. Evolution is concerned with the idea of future generations. As John Wilke has stated, "In truth we did not come from a single cell. Rather, each of us once was a single cell; and all we have done since then has been growing.
