Or energy might have been created ex nihilo (from nothing).
These Titanic Processes of Creation Give the Appearance of Having Been Fine-Tuned. There are a number of physical constants underlying these creation processes which, if they had been just a bit different, would evidently have made the universe, as we know it, an impossibility. There may be natural explanations for these "cosmic coincidences"; for example, perhaps our universe is merely one of many, and ours happens to be the one in which the physical constants are what they need to be. Or perhaps not ....
Is this what evolutionists are supposed to be hating? Why should an evolutionist hate or even disagree with this statement (which is irrelevent to evolution anyway), and how do you account for the fact that the author accepts evolution?
Upvote
0