- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,334
- 52,694
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Isn't Europe where the Antichrist is supposed to come from?In Europe about 98% of Christians would qualify as evolutionists.
Excuse me, but since when is evolution "true science"?That is my point, there is a difference between: "evilution" and evolution. I have said many times there is no conflict between true science (evolution) and the Bible.
Teach children punctuation.It's fed everywhere because it's true, what would you have schools do?
No, he will be the false messiah and win wars for Israel.Isn't Europe where the Antichrist is supposed to come from?
I thought he was supposed to come from the European Common Market ... or some such place.No, he will be the false messiah and win wars for Israel.
How's it working out, in your opinion?I come here because I think good science is worth defending. I think good science is important for the future of the human race. The problem is that some Christians have decided that they need to stop people from doing science, from learning about science, and from advancing science. I think it is worth my time showing that their arguments don't hold weight.
I come here because I think good science is worth defending. I think good science is important for the future of the human race. The problem is that some Christians have decided that they need to stop people from doing science, from learning about science, and from advancing science. I think it is worth my time showing that their arguments don't hold weight.
That is my point, there is a difference between: "evilution" and evolution. I have said many times there is no conflict between true science (evolution) and the Bible.
The problem is that "evilution" is a fake, a copy or a counterfeit of the real thing.
The irony being that its science that destroys the famous 19th century conjecture...
You are assuming that you would accept valid science if it conflicts with your religious beliefs.Excuse me, but since when is evolution "true science"?
If it was, i'd be a theistic evolutionist, . . .
because there wouldbe evidence to support evolution,
and DNA would be able to write itself by means of data corruption and selection of the viable remnants of mutated life.
How's it working out, in your opinion?
Ask yourself why do they bother coming here to post?
Don't they have anything better to do with their life?
Get real.
Evolution is fed everywhere, even in cartoons, you name it.
The irony being that its science that destroys the famous 19th century conjecture...
But that will take a generation to trickle down to the sheeple, as usual...
(edited)
So they say, but so they can't show...And exactly what "conjecture" would that be? Surely not Evolution, because, although it could fairly be described as unproven in 1859, or even 1900, that is in no way the case today.
I think it is because the god they serve rewards them for their service. As Dylan says: You got to serve somebody: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/bobdylan/gottaservesomebody.htmlAsk yourself why do they bother coming here to post?
Don't they have anything better to do with their life?
That is fine with me, call it theistic evolution if you want. So really our choice is are we going to endorse theistic evolution or atheistic evolution.Excuse me, but since when is evolution "true science"?
If it was, i'd be a theistic evolutionist,
The skeptics/scoffers aren't able to address the evidence that is presented, and this demonstrates that they are with support. Again you have shown that we always accuse others of the very thing we are guilty of.Pretty good. Creationists aren't able to address the evidence that is presented, and this demonstrates to readers that creationism is without support.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?