If one of you would actually study some of the phenomena I post, then you will be wiser about evidence.
Meanwhile...of the 5 forensically analyzed eucharistic miracles, all yeiled traumatized human heart myocardium, with inexplicable white cells. They should not be there but they are. The samples are years old and white cells lyse after minutes or hours in vitro. So these samples were also alive at sampling time. So this is true abiogenesis. Life from inert materials (bread).
It did not happen by successive small change over billions of years. The conversions were not from life and were progressive over a few days.
Multiple samples many different forensic teams, all came to the same conclusion, including that the bread was so intermingled at the edge of the heart it was impossible to fake. That blood forced its way out of the bread not in!
All of the samples yielded massive positive tests for human blood, human flesh, but no nuclear genetic code. A fraud would have the DNA of the fraudster or victim.
HOT OFF THE PRESS
But here is the kicker, one of the eucharistic miracles, and the inexplicable bleeding statue of cochabamba were also analysed by the recently developed italian technology for single white cell MITOCHONDRIAL DNA. The samples both had no nuclear DNA but they do yeild mitochondrial (MATERNAL) DNA.
Turns out that both the statue and the eucharistic miracle have the same mitochondrial haplogroup of middle eastern origin. At very least that haplogroup match is 1/16000000 against happening.
As Einstein once said "coincidence is Gods way of remaining anonymous"
Now considering that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of the "critical step" in random chance abiogenesis as Dawkins would have it, either whether random chance abiogenesis happened , how it happened , or what happened... no postulated mechanism. No postulated intermediate.
The present score on abiogenesis evidence
Theistic Abiognesis 5 - Dawkins variety 0 . Nada . None. Zip. Nothing.
He has no idea. Not a clue. No evidence whatsoever.
Harvard put their name, as did other wealthy sponsors and NASA behind various projects to investigate the origin of life. They all drew a blank for how the 18000 protein chemical factory and software (our minimum cell came to be out of soup)
Not even comjecture about a candidate for the minimum evolving cell. ( the acid test) all the rest is at best plausibility arguments, not evidence.
..but they still keep saying it "must have happened" even though they have no evidence it actually did. So Dont you dare talk about lack of evidence.
The stuff in kids books on life from chemical soup is unsubstantiated unevidenced BS!!!!!
So Keep up.
The REAL evidence for abiogenesis (theistic style) is fascinating.
Get hold of a copy of "My human heart" tesoriero. Just published. It will get you up to date.
Also it is increasingly likely a similar single cell mitochondrial test will be done on the shroud, or sudarium to see if that matches mitochondrial dna of eucharistic miracles too. Who would bet against it? The letter is on pope francis desk as we speak, being urged to do it by those who investigated the buenos airies miracle at his behest. Im guessing francis collins will also be putting pressure to do it.
After all, who was the only person in history claimed to have no human father but did have a mother? It seems there is evidence of that. Mitochondrial vs nuclear DNA profiles.
I like evidence.
The absence of that 'good evidence' leads us towards the conclusion that 'the radically different universe' is, inescapably, just another undistinguished belief, which will always find miraculous justifications amongst the minds of unscientifically thinking believers.
Will he ever admit to it being no more than that?