Evidence Media Is Centrally Controlled By Deep State

[Think...]

I find a marked difference between a global organization telling all churches what to preach - vs - news organizations having a common agenda.

The common agenda is clear and visible - hard to argue because it is so very evident to even the casual observer. Whether left or right leaning, its there and always has been. The divide became wider than ever over the last six years.

The churchianity agenda is very visible to those who observe it in all its mediums.

It's just that far fewer do.

And of those, how many notice the patterns?

Not too many, I guess.

 

[Always in His Presence]

The churchianity agenda is very visible to those who observe it in all its mediums.

It's just that far fewer do.

And of those, how many notice the patterns?

Not too many, I guess.

You are welcome to your opinion.

As for me I can't even find two churches in the city I live in preaching the same thing - let alone globally. But hey! I only travel 80,000 miles a year internationally, what do I know.

Unless you have something specific showing an agenda and what is being preached - certainly you have hundreds of examples to share.

 

[The Barbarian]

I find a marked difference between a global organization telling all churches what to preach - vs - news organizations having a common agenda.

The common agenda is clear and visible - hard to argue because it is so very evident to even the casual observer. Whether left or right leaning, its there and always has been. The divide became wider than ever over the last six years.

That would be divergent agendas. And it's a good thing in a free society. Granted, the whackos have a bigger share of the press now, but the more moderate mainstream media are much more sensible than those out on the fringes of left and right.

 

[Always in His Presence]

That would be divergent agendas. And it's a good thing in a free society. Granted, the whackos have a bigger share of the press now, but the more moderate mainstream media are much more sensible than those out on the fringes of left and right.

opinions differ - have a great day.

 

[Joy]

MOD HAT ON

This Thread has Moved

From General Politics

To Conspiracy Theories

MOD HAT OFF​

 

[Think...]

You are welcome to your opinion.

Thanks

... certainly you have hundreds of examples to share.

No, I don't feel the need to prove every single thing I share like I did a decade ago.

I share what I've observed and those who have seen it as well are edified and confirmed.

Those who haven't, can look into it or be aware of someone mentioning it in case they notice it later.

It's just not always worth playing the PROVE YOUR CLAIM!! PROVE YOUR CLAIM!! game.

 

[Think...]

MOD HAT ON

This Thread has Moved

From General Politics

To Conspiracy Theories

MOD HAT OFF​

Is it the OP that is being considered a Conspiracy Theory?

I only ask because there's lots of videos out there showing the concept of News Media all reporting the same thing verbatim.

Why that's happening is up for debate, but it doesn't appear to be just a theory.

 

[Always in His Presence]

No, I don't feel the need to prove every single thing I share like I did a decade ago.

How about one?

The days of trusting an anonymous poster on an internet forum, just because they say so is long gone my friend. If you are going to make a grandiose statement, you should be prepared to back it up. It is called debate - in face it is addressed in the forum rules.

I don't know who you are. Therefore I place no credence on unsubstantiated claims considering your first two refences fell apart. Have a great day, if you change your mind and decide to engage, I'm more than happy to converse.

 

[Think...]

How about one?

The days of trusting an anonymous poster on an internet forum, just because they say so is long gone my friend. If you are going to make a grandiose statement, you should be prepared to back it up. It is called debate - in face it is addressed in the forum rules.

I don't know who you are. Therefore I place no credence on unsubstantiated claims considering your first two refences fell apart. Have a great day, if you change your mind and decide to engage, I'm more than happy to converse.

Nope.

None of my references "fell apart".

And there's certainly no rule that states that everyone must agree with your claims, or sources.

The WCC is what it is and does what is does, and the Vatican has power all over the world. PERIOD.

I'm not gonna waste my time making an extensive case to you about any of that which would require a whole 'nother thread.

Those who are in the know, know. Your utter blindness about the reality of the state of the world we live in is not my problem, and your stubborn insistence on remaining blind is your prerogative.

Enjoy.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Those who are in the know, know. Your utter blindness about the reality of the state of the world we live in is not my problem, and your stubborn insistence on remaining blind is your prerogative.

Gotta admit, that made me laugh.

See ya!

 

[JacksBratt]

To ignore the obvious truth that the legacy media is controlled and fed a common false agenda... is fool hardy.

The fact that CNN and other are losing viewers like a maple tree loses it's leaves in the fall.... gave me new hope in humanity.

To see CNN responding by tossing the most opinionated puppet leftist so called "journalists" to the curb.. is also a sign that humanity has some hope of having truth restored.

 

[The Barbarian]

To ignore the obvious truth that the legacy media is controlled and fed a common false agenda... is fool hardy.

Sorry, absent any evidence, to imagine that there is a widespread conspiracy that makes CNN, NBC, Fox, etc. march in lockstep is extremely foolish.

 

[Think...]

Sorry, absent any evidence, to imagine that there is a widespread conspiracy that makes CNN, NBC, Fox, etc. march in lockstep is extremely foolish.

It's only "absent any evidence" to those who refuse to see it, .... and to those who are working to cover it up and deny it.

For the rest of us, it is plainly apparent.

Those who would deny the obvious are "extremely foolish."

 

[The Barbarian]

It's only "absent any evidence" to those who refuse to see it, .... and to those who are working to cover it up and deny it.

For the rest of us, it is plainly apparent.

Evidence that requires a pre-existing belief to see it isn't evidence at all.

 

[Think...]

Evidence that requires a pre-existing belief to see it isn't evidence at all.

You might want to ask God about that.

God blinds the eyes of the unbelieving.

John 12:40
2 Corinthians 4:4
1 John 5:19

 

[The Barbarian]

Evidence that requires a pre-existing belief to see it isn't evidence at all.

You might want to ask God about that.

If you have it as a religious belief, that's a different story. Religious beliefs are taken on faith in holy writings or prophets. But be careful of which alleged prophet you are following.

God blinds the eyes of those believing in false prophets.

 

[Think...]

God blinds the eyes of those believing in false prophets.

That wouldn't make sense for 2 of the 3 verses I posted, BUT I'm not married to the idea of continuing this debate so, ... agree to disagree, I guess.