Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've read many articles from ID proponents and find what you say to be inaccurate. I doubt you have followed it closely or you would not be insinuating those things.
Perhaps you could provide some examples? Specifically a total re-defining of basic scientific terms. Or perhaps it is the evolution proponents that have hijacked the terms?
All of the papers Gradyll has linked to fit one or more of the three descriptions.
All it takes to disprove my satement is a single counter-example. Posting a link to a legitimate research paper from DI or one f the other ID "research institutes" will show me up far better than impotently ranting does.
I am saying is how can a page of quotes be false?
IF I were to post them here would I be false too?
After all they are other peoples words.
The Bible tells us that "there is no God." It is right there in David's own words at the beginning of Psalm 14. According to your logic, I am simply pasting a quote, and because its in David's own words, the it must be exactly what he meant. It does not matter that I had to hack the four words out of a longer sentence, or that later in the same psalm, David praises God, all that matters is that I was able to find those four words in that order all together.
and you know every single peer review institution in america do you? nnice!Did I also mention that "Transactions of the Wessex Institute" is not a peer reviewed journal?
I actually read it yes, you,Also, you can't even tell us about the science found in the fake paper?
do I have to do everything?Then link to one of those papers and discuss how it is a valid peer reviewed article on ID. What is stopping you?
So says the person who is refusing to discuss a single one of those papers. Get off your fanny and show us how this is valid science that supports ID.
You went totally off subject. I am speaking about Intelligent Design. Not creationism. None of those points addresses ID theory or their peer reviewed papers or articles or books.
Did everything come from nothing?
How did life come from non life?
How did the first life develop the ability to reproduce itself in the fist generation?
Explain away irreducible complexity?
other than all the peer reviews I posted?
those are evidence of design.
try this page:
Intelligent Reasoning: Measuring Complex Specified Information with Respect to Biology
Intelligent Reasoning: Biological Specification (Dembski CSI) and My explanation of CSI
a little about falsification and design inference:
Intelligent Reasoning: January 2006
Did everything come from nothing?
How did life come from non life?
How did the first life develop the ability to reproduce itself in the fist generation?
Explain away irreducible complexity?
It's a simple question... If I pick an object at random, what do I look for in that object that will tell me if it is a designed object?
Nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is the natural laws that govern the adaptation of living populations over generations. You need existing populations for those laws to act on.
.
The first three points have nothing to do with evolution, they pertain to abiogenesis.
The fourth is simple: life is not irreducibly complex. There. : D
Yeah, he's obviously not biased at all, is he?[/sarcasm]
It's a simple question... If I pick an object at random, what do I look for in that object that will tell me if it is a designed object?
do you call misquotes from the Bible quote mines?
no body does,
because quote mines only exist in the evolutionists mind.
IF it has CSI, and those links explained it.
Then what, specifically is the nature and amount of the difference in CSI levels between this structure:
Sphinx In Egypt Royalty Free Stock Photo - Image: 13868805
and this structure:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphynx_(Romania)
?
You can't tell that for yourself?
I think your view of evolution is a little narrow.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?