Evidence against the Theory of evolution. Thread Moved From Teens

[superman27e]

I'm not sure where to post this so i'll post it here.

Move if necessary.


Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world. Life is far too complex to have resulted from any chance happening. Even the simplest form of life consists of billions of parts working together and needed for the basic functioning of the organism. These could not have sprung into being at the same time and interrelating together by chance. Life coming from matter would violate the law of biogenesis and the cell principle which state that life must come only from life. Secondly, we find that the first matter could not simply have come into existence from nothing. This is a logical absurdity. Finally, we find that morality in humanity as well as our mental capacity and utter dominance of the physical world make humanity set apart by any reasonable means from the rest of the living world.

1. "The simplest organism capable of independent life, the prokargote bacterial cell, is a masterpiece of miniaturized complexity which makes a spaceship seem rather low-tech.
2. "The cell needs all its basic parts with their various functions, for survival; therefore, if the cell had evolved, it would have meant that billions of parts would have had to come into existence at the same time, in the same place, and then simultaneously come together in a precise order.
3. "...the probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing shop!

source: http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/evid3.htm

 

[Klavier]

For once I'd like to see some actual evidence other than this creationism idiocy and its "scientists" grasping at straws.

If only I could find my "We have the fossils, we win" banner...

 

[itisdeliciouscake]

WE'RE ALL GOING TO SIE!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sry..... but this topic is made over 9000 times every day. everyone's heard every argument before......

i think the wisest thing to do in all honesty would be to request that this thread gets deleted..... it will lead to another ginormous flame war that no one will enjoy.

all that will happen is repeated arguments that we've all heard before. after that, it will become a 'prove it!'/'no you prove it first!' argument.

 

[itisdeliciouscake]

For once I'd like to see some actual evidence other than this creationism idiocy and its "scientists" grasping at straws.

If only I could find my "We have the fossils, we win" banner...

why am i so weak? =(

i couldn't resist responding to this, so i'll try and keep it a bit short.
you can't pretend fossils are proof.... we have the exact same evidence, the exact same fossils, presenting arguments on both side.

but just saying......... Cambrian age fossils.....

 

[Terax]

Honestly.. it won't do any good to waste my time responding to each point. Instead, you can settle with a nomination to FSTDT and a t-shirt. Thank you for playing.

 

[HeDied4Me]

Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing

I admit, I stopped reading after this beginning.

Evolution is not about origins of the universe or abiogenesis. Evolution is about the development of life after it had already appeared. I had this same message repeated to me many times until I finally understood that these are separate issues and deserve to be treated as such.

 

[Tallerthanatree]

Which YEC website did you copy and past this from?

Goodness, this site needs a smiley.

 

[HeDied4Me]

Which YEC website did you copy and past this from?

Goodness, this site needs a smiley.

There was one, long ago. It got removed because it was used in flaming too often.

Sad day...

 

[Theogonia]

lol how many times has irreducible complexity been disproven?

and how many times do YECs STILL use it as evidence?

 

[Tallerthanatree]

There was one, long ago. It got removed because it was used in flaming too often.

Sad day...

That is most unfortunate.

 

[DarcyWillow]

Can we discuss number 12? Apparently the author is equally confused with the theory of gravity as they are with evolution.

"In addition, without the sun, etc., there would be no gravity. Therefore, those supposed gases from which all things supposedly come would simply disseminate into space not draw together to form anything. "

 

[DarkLegend28]

Lol fail

evolution exists, get over it. It doesn't contradict your beliefs.

 

[R3quiem]

Another evolution debate? Really? We don't have enough of those already?

If I had a nickel for every time someone confused the topics of evolution and abiogenesis, I'd have, well, at least 3 dollars.

 

[Klavier]

Lol fail

evolution exists, get over it. It doesn't contradict your beliefs.

Remember, people don't like to reason if they're sure someone randomly decided HEY LETS MAKE A WORLD AND MAKE EVERYONE FIGHT~

 

[pac422man]

FYI There is an entire Evolution vs. Creation board, where you will probably get much better responses than you would here.

I won't make any further comment to avoid a debate I am not in the mood to get into....

 

[K9_Trainer]

 

[Seriyan]

Can we discuss number 12? Apparently the author is equally confused with the theory of gravity as they are with evolution.

The author is equally confused with everything on the list.

 

[Jocklen]

Lol fail

evolution exists, get over it. It doesn't contradict your beliefs.

macroevolution contradicts young-earth creationist beliefs

 

[Theogonia]

macroevolution contradicts young-earth creationist beliefs

bolded for emphasis

YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST beliefs

not christian beliefs

have a nice day

 

[Klavier]

The author really gets mixed up here. One gigantic shipment of fail.