Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
But as i said, we are on the topic referenced in v21 - where tsela is translated as "side" or "rib". I've never said "tsela" = bone. Also, as I said, this v23 makes "side" correct because of the "flesh of my flesh".. so apparently it's not just a rib.
But you've failed to explain why and how sin entered.Correct. I’ve said that before, it shouldn’t come as a surprise.
I have said over and over that at some point sin entered the world. Why and how isn't important. It certainly didn't enter the world because a young woman ate a piece of fruit.But you've failed to explain why and how sin entered.
I have said over and over that at some point sin entered the world. Why and how isn't important. It certainly didn't enter the world because a young woman ate a piece of fruit.
2 Cor 11... 1I wish you would bear with me in a little foolishness. Do bear with me! 2For I feel a divine jealousy for you, since I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ. 3But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ. 4For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or if you accept a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it readily enough. 5Indeed, I consider that I am not in the least inferior to these super-apostles.6Even if I am unskilled in speaking, I am not so in knowledge; indeed, in every way we have made this plain to you in all things.
In this instance Eve is presented as literal and historical.
I'm beginning to wonder if the Theo-Evos are presenting a different gospel.
So far the Theo-Evos refuse to tell us how sin entered into the world. The Bible is very clear it was an act of disobedience. The Theo-Evos have no answer for this disobedience. You Archivist have no answer. Where is your theology for the act of disobedience and the need for the gospel of Jesus Christ in light of the T.o.E?
At what point did sin enter the world?
How do you want to have answer for this disobedience? What do you even mean?The Bible is very clear it was an act of disobedience. The Theo-Evos have no answer for this disobedience.
How do you want to have answer for this disobedience? What do you even mean? In the text, we can read about disobedience. What does it represent, if really some eating from a literal tree or something deeper, nobody can know for certain. But it does not put away the message that people disobeyed God.
So than how was the area destroyed if figurative?
The bible said the city's where destroyed there.
Or is this just another story not be be believed?
Read post #740The word 6106. etsem is used for bone.
So, the statement you made about "only bible believers accepting your arguments" is something you made up. Is this why you consider citing apologists, linking to other apologetic support meaningless. We have to be making stuff up now just like you?Make a bible case, forget nommie sites. They do not matter. Might as well ask a horse. When I was young I went to Catholic school, and we had 'catechism' where I learned about Adam and Noah and etc. Just because some popes abandoned the faith lately does not mean that I did.
How do you want to have answer for this disobedience? What do you even mean?
In the text, we can read about disobedience. What does it represent, if really some eating from a literal tree or something deeper, nobody can know for certain. But it does not put away the message that people disobeyed God.
the Bible tells us exactly how sin entered into the world. That means is carried into the New Testament.Correct. The Genesis allegories tell us 1) that God created everything, although they do not tell us exactly how He did it; 2) that sin entered the world; and 3) that man was in need of redemption, which, of course, came through Jesus Christ.
And you are free to accept the Biblical creation account as accurate. I do not, I view it as allegory.the Bible tells us exactly how sin entered into the world. That means is carried into the New Testament.
Under the assumption that God used natural means,
then "fire and sulfer" could probably be a volcano,
especially since sulfer is stated.
It's destruction being described/detailed accurately
or literally makes 0 effect towards Christianity.
Can animals sin? What is a sin? You need some Law from God and a higher intelect to have a possibility to sin.Did the pre-humans sin? Theo-Evos whom I have talked with say no.
When God took a man and said "you will not...xyz" and the man disobeyed.If that be so somewhere in the so-called human evolution the population people began to sin. When was that? What was that sin? Why should mankind be responsible for that sin?
Probably in the same way as animals did.How did man get a spirit?
As long as I noticed in the discussion, you were not able to answer any question from "theo-evo" and you also make quite big mistakes in your theology (for example, you seem to be confused about soul/spirit thing, if we are it or if we are given it...).It is my belief that the Theo-Evo sect won't answer these question because they can't answer them and conform to what the bible says.
Here, at the northern tip of the Dead Sea, we have
scientific corroboration for a biblical miracle.
Seems science confirms the area was destroyed
by fire and brimstone from above literally.
Tall el-Hammam is biblical Sodom - The Cosmic Tusk
What it does is prove the bible accurate in this event.
If a christian does not believe the word of God by
faith, not sure if they are even a christian.
So do you believe God will heal this area,
or is this not literally ?
First we need to know the Author. Otherwise you get confused.I do not know, you are still running in circles.
First, do you agree that to understand ancient Hebrew book, you should learn about ancient Hebrew world and thinking?
And you are free to accept the Biblical creation account as accurate. I do not, I view it as allegory.
I do not consider people who believe in evolution bible believers.So, the statement you made about "only bible believers accepting your arguments" is something you made up. Is this why you consider citing apologists, linking to other apologetic support meaningless. We have to be making stuff up now just like you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?