Some fear that belief in the sovereign grace of God leads to the conclusion that evangelism is pointless, since God will save His elect anyway, whether they hear the gospel or not. This, as we have seen, is a false conclusion based on a false assumption. But now we must go further, and point out that the truth is just the opposite. So far from making evangelism pointless, the sovereignty of God in grace is the one thing that prevents evangelism from being pointless. For it creates the possibilityindeed, the certaintythat evangelism will be fruitful. Apart from it, there is not even a possibility of evangelism being fruitful. Were it not for the sovereign grace of God, evangelism would be the most futile and useless enterprise that the world has ever seen, and there would be no more complete waste of time under the sun than to preach the Christian gospel.
Why is this? Because of the spiritual inability of man in sin. Let Paul, the greatest of all evangelists, explain this to us.
Fallen man, says Paul, has a blinded mind, and so is unable to grasp spiritual truth. The natural (unspiritual, unregenerate) man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.[1Cor ii.14] Again, he has a perverse and ungodly nature. The carnal mind (the mind of the unregenerate man) is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. The consequence? So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.[Rom viii.7 f.] In both these passages Paul makes two distinct statements about fallen man in relation to Gods truth, and the progression of thought is parallel in both cases. First Paul asserts unregenerate mans failure, as a matter of fact. He receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; he is not subject to the law of God. But then Paul goes on to interpret his first statement by a second, to the effect that this failure is a necessity of nature, some- thing certain and inevitable and universal and unalterable, just because it is not in man to do other- wise than fail in this way. Neither can he know them. Neither indeed can be. Man in Adam has not got it in him to apprehend spiritual realities, or to obey Gods law from his heart. Enmity against God, leading to defection from God, is the law of his nature. It is, so to speak, instinctive to him to suppress and evade and deny Gods truth, and to shrug off Gods authority and to flout Gods lawyes, and when he hears the gospel to disbelieve and disobey that too. This is the sort of person that he is. He is, says Paul, dead in trespasses and sins[Eph ii.1]wholly incapacitated for any positive reaction to Gods Word, deaf to Gods speech, blind to Gods revelation, impervious to Gods inducements. If you talk to a corpse, there is no response; the man is dead. When Gods Word is spoken to sinners, there is equally no response; they are dead in trespasses and sins.
Nor is this all. Paul also tells us that Satan (whose power and ill will he never underestimates) is constantly active to keep sinners in their natural state. Satan now worketh in the children of disobedience[Eph ii.2] to ensure that they do not obey Gods law. And the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ . . . should shine unto them.[2Cor iv.4] So that there are two obstacles in the way of successful evangelism: the first, mans natural and irresistible impulse to oppose God, and the second, Satans assiduity in shepherding man in the ways of unbelief and disobedience.
What does this mean for evangelism? It means, quite simply, that evangelism, described as we have described it, cannot possibly succeed. However clear and cogent we may be in presenting the gospel, we have no hope of convincing or converting anyone. Can you or I by our earnest talking break the power of Satan over a mans life? No. Can you or I give life to the spiritually dead? No. Can we hope to convince sinners of the truth of the gospel by patient explanation? No. Can we hope to move men to obey the gospel by any words of entreaty that we may utter? No. Our approach to evangelism is not realistic till we have faced this shattering fact, and let it make its proper impact on us. When a schoolmaster is trying to teach children arithmetic, or grammar, and finds them slow to learn, he assures himself that the penny must drop sooner or later, and so encourages himself to keep on trying. We can most of us muster great reserves of patience if we think that there is some prospect of ultimate success in what we are attempting. But in the case of evangelism there is no such prospect. Regarded as a human enterprise, evangelism is a hopeless task. It cannot in principle produce the desired effect. We can preach, and preach clearly and fluently and attractively; we can talk to individuals in the most pointed and challenging way; we can organize special services, and distribute tracts, and put up posters, and flood the country with publicityand there is not the slightest prospect that all this outlay of effort will bring a single soul home to God. Unless there is some other factor in the situation, over and above our own endeavours, all evangelistic action is foredoomed to failure. This is the fact, the brute, rock-bottom fact, that we have to face.
