Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Adelheide said:When a parent teaches a child through disceplin that stealing is wrong and yet they go and steal....and beyond that excuse why it was ok to steal....does that disprove the truth in what the parent was saying? Simply because the child did not listen?
MortonGneiss said:Your analogy fails in that there is only one parent..we are talking about several thousand parents, and some of them are saying stealing is good. So, nice try.
Adelheide said:I truely believe when people read some thing contrary to there current beliefs they can find an unlimited source of reasons not to believe it. It's called reading with a preconcieved idea. Selective learning if you will. In sence if you read the bible to disprove it you will...if you read it to see if it's the truth...the truth will be revealed.
i was specifically talking about christianity since you seem to be so forward with targeting how the worth or excistance of our God depended on our actions. In which my analogy does not fail.
The truth of not stealing is based on our actions of wether we steal or not. Try to apply this to what you think about us christians who do not live up to the existance and worthyness of God
i'm sorry i mistyped that.
The truth that, stealing is wrong, is not based on our actions of wether we steal or not. is what i meant to say.
TTheere's a big differance in christianity and churchianity.MortonGneiss said:Israel is a bright shiny example to the truth of that statement.
The Gospels don't offend me, they are just writing.
I think only Christians are ignorant of what Christianity is all about, converting people to the 'one' truth in a historically violent fashion.
You made a number of other points but I addressed all of them earlier, and have no wish to cover that ground again.
It makes sense that monotheistic religions think they're right and that opposing beliefs are not right.MortonGneiss said:The original point was that Judeo-Christianity, while being divisive enough to faction off into several thousand sects, is ethnocentric at it's core, which is why none of the factions will ever reconcile their differences.
The unanswered question is, if these beliefs aren't inherently divisive and ethnocentric then how is it possible that so many opposing sects of Christianity exist?
Another question that arises from this topic is, if several thousand sects can't agree on the correct method of appeasing their child-like God, then how can it be assumed that any of them have the answer?
If anybody is ethnocentric it's you.Not hinduism, it varies from person to person as well as religions.satay said:Hey MortonGneiss,
Here comes the "I will pray for you bit".
You angry man...you need GOD and by the by you need "our" god and the only god...what you don't repent!! Okay, I will pray for you.
By the way, No Maleccha is even willing to try to "convert" me even after open invitations. They are only interested in "buying" the poor out with food, medicine and bible.
Sell me your God, Malecchas.
satay
urnotme said:If anybody is ethnocentric it's you.Not hinduism, it varies from person to person as well as religions.
troglodyte said:wow... that was oxymoronic...
i think its safe to say we will always have opinions... and that is the essence of Ethnocentrism...
this topic is selfdefeating...
satay said:What happened to all the malecchas over here? They ran away as usual?
Shame...
satay
arunma said:Morton, the problem is that you're not listening to anyone else's arguments. Your suggestion is absurd to begin with, and I think you're desperately trying to defend a belief with nothing more than your personal opinion.
MortonGneiss said:Right..the most compelling argument that's been presented is people admitting that they don't know what ethnic means...that's valuable insight. You're right, how could I refuse to tackle such frighteningly valueable input as that..oh, no wait, I did refute that without contention because I was weary of reading such blatant illiteracy.
There was another point about Christianity not being responsible for the Inquistion or the Spanish Conquest in the new world, which again was crushed.
So aside from you saying 'nuh uh', what intelligble argument have I not addressed? You seem convinced that my argument has no grounds but you don't seem willing to defend that stance, or support that position with evidence or a real argument. Again, I'm not moved by opinion (2a), either show me you can argue against my position or admit you can't a bow out with a little self-respect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?