Essential vs Non-Essential Doctrine

[Jim B]

Dear friend you yourself with God's help can to know that what I said are essential. I have not time to write sorry. I wrote only example. May these points can be more than 10 or less.
I read Bible 10 time and The Gospel mayby 40-50 time. I dont want argue. I said only my opinion.
You have strange point of view about some subjects, be careful.
Orange in Christ

Orange. Nobody is wanting to argue with you. If you will re-read the OP you will see that I was asking for help in determining what doctrines are essential and which are non-essential based on what the Bible claims. I was not asking for opinions, I was asking for help. Sorry I rubbed your fur the wrong way. it was not my intention. If you would like to offer an apology for your unwarranted remarks, I would be happy to accept it.

----

And for the person who asked, Yes I have read Hank Hanegraaf's "essentials" at his website. As with a lot of things, Hammerin' Hank got it wrong again.

\o/

 

[EdmundBlackadderTheThird]

I would say without a doubt in my mind that Romans 10 contains all the essential doctrine for salavation. This does not include the reason we need salvation but that is found in Romans 5. It is my firm belief that you can teach all the doctrine essential to salvation out of those two chapters. You might drop in Romans 6:23 to be on the safe side.

 

[Radagast]

I'd start with the Creed...

-- Radagast

 

[Jim B]

I'd start with the Creed...

-- Radagast

Which one?