I ask you all:
What is essential Christianity? That is, what is necessary for a person to believe to be saved? or the negative way to put it, what must a person positively deny in order to be damned?
Another way to ask it is What are God's commands to us? Shall I assume here that we all will agree that we have no right whatsoever to disbelieve what God says is true and no right to disobey or call false a specific command of God? I think that is safe to say. Few would say that calling God a liar is OK, which is what positively disbelieving His commands amounts to.
To clarify- positively denying a belief is when you know the proposition and say that it is false. That is important because some people can be in the state of not affirming a belief yet not denying it either because they do not know about it. So, I asked what must a person positively deny to be damned with that distinction in mind.
Again the question is:
What are the essentials of Christianity?
I think that the variety of answers I would get and may get should lead us to think about this question a bit more. How is it that the essentials are so unknowable? Now the baptist may say that baptism is not an essential for salvation. But does not our Lord command it? Do we have the right to tell the Lord that he has no right to command something, or at the very least that not all His commands are binding upon us? A Presbyterian may say that God has commanded us to baptize our children. But when asked if a baptist is just as much a Christian as he, the answer is almost invariably "Yes", even emphatically "YES." But how can it be that if God positively commands infant baptism, that the baptist can be considered Christian for calling paedo-baptism a false practice? From a Presbyterian perspective, does that not amount to the baptist saying that God's command is false? It surely does? How then does the Presbyterian then refer to the Baptist as a Christian brother when the Baptist calls God a liar- again from the Pres. perspective? The Pres. may then retreat and say that it is not an essential. But then he is saying that God's commands may be regarded and disregarded as we mortals see fit. Or shall he retreat from the argument that the reason Presbyterians baptize their babies is because God commands it vis a vis the covenant? Then the practice becomes the mere invention of mere men and ought not be tolerated.
Now if the baptist is right and paedo-baptism is a false practice, wherefore does he call the Pres. his brother? For the Pres. passes off the inventions of men as the divine commands of Almighty God! Such audacity and pride is not fit the name of Christ but only of anti-Christ.
But who is right in the debate? One or the other. Not both. But how can we decide? Both have their scriptures that "plainly teach" doctrine A and not doctrine B.
This is not just theological wrangling. We are trying to find the Word of God. The Words of Life. Can we be so cavalier with them? Can we just agree to disagree about what Almighty God's commands are? Can we know what essential Christianity actually is and thus be Christian? Can the baptist and the presbyterian be right? The Law of Noncontradiciton says No. Can they both contain essential Christianity? One either calls God a liar or passes itself off as God. So the answer is No. Can both be in the state of not possessing essential Christianity? Yes, or course. They both can possess erroneous doctrine and either call God a liar or pass themsleves off as God.
And this is just dealing with Baptists and Presbyterians. I am sure that there are many other sects represented here. Fill in the blank. Who are you and what are you and then distinguish yourself from the others.
What do you believe is the base amount you must believe to be saved?
I think all of God's Word is just the bare minimum, no less than all of God's Word. The question is, how do we discover it?
Thanks.
St. Daggett
What is essential Christianity? That is, what is necessary for a person to believe to be saved? or the negative way to put it, what must a person positively deny in order to be damned?
Another way to ask it is What are God's commands to us? Shall I assume here that we all will agree that we have no right whatsoever to disbelieve what God says is true and no right to disobey or call false a specific command of God? I think that is safe to say. Few would say that calling God a liar is OK, which is what positively disbelieving His commands amounts to.
To clarify- positively denying a belief is when you know the proposition and say that it is false. That is important because some people can be in the state of not affirming a belief yet not denying it either because they do not know about it. So, I asked what must a person positively deny to be damned with that distinction in mind.
Again the question is:
What are the essentials of Christianity?
I think that the variety of answers I would get and may get should lead us to think about this question a bit more. How is it that the essentials are so unknowable? Now the baptist may say that baptism is not an essential for salvation. But does not our Lord command it? Do we have the right to tell the Lord that he has no right to command something, or at the very least that not all His commands are binding upon us? A Presbyterian may say that God has commanded us to baptize our children. But when asked if a baptist is just as much a Christian as he, the answer is almost invariably "Yes", even emphatically "YES." But how can it be that if God positively commands infant baptism, that the baptist can be considered Christian for calling paedo-baptism a false practice? From a Presbyterian perspective, does that not amount to the baptist saying that God's command is false? It surely does? How then does the Presbyterian then refer to the Baptist as a Christian brother when the Baptist calls God a liar- again from the Pres. perspective? The Pres. may then retreat and say that it is not an essential. But then he is saying that God's commands may be regarded and disregarded as we mortals see fit. Or shall he retreat from the argument that the reason Presbyterians baptize their babies is because God commands it vis a vis the covenant? Then the practice becomes the mere invention of mere men and ought not be tolerated.
Now if the baptist is right and paedo-baptism is a false practice, wherefore does he call the Pres. his brother? For the Pres. passes off the inventions of men as the divine commands of Almighty God! Such audacity and pride is not fit the name of Christ but only of anti-Christ.
But who is right in the debate? One or the other. Not both. But how can we decide? Both have their scriptures that "plainly teach" doctrine A and not doctrine B.
This is not just theological wrangling. We are trying to find the Word of God. The Words of Life. Can we be so cavalier with them? Can we just agree to disagree about what Almighty God's commands are? Can we know what essential Christianity actually is and thus be Christian? Can the baptist and the presbyterian be right? The Law of Noncontradiciton says No. Can they both contain essential Christianity? One either calls God a liar or passes itself off as God. So the answer is No. Can both be in the state of not possessing essential Christianity? Yes, or course. They both can possess erroneous doctrine and either call God a liar or pass themsleves off as God.
And this is just dealing with Baptists and Presbyterians. I am sure that there are many other sects represented here. Fill in the blank. Who are you and what are you and then distinguish yourself from the others.
What do you believe is the base amount you must believe to be saved?
I think all of God's Word is just the bare minimum, no less than all of God's Word. The question is, how do we discover it?
Thanks.
St. Daggett