• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Equal Rights

pekkle

Active Member
Mar 8, 2008
37
4
✟22,678.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
150 years ago: The abolition of slavery

100 years ago: The emancipation of women

50 years ago: Inter-racial marriage

Today: Same-sex relations

Why is it that the church always has to be dragged kicking and screaming (by secular outrage) towards the tolerance and compassion that, ironically, it claims to hold a monopoly on?
 

Meshavrischika

for Thy greater honor and glory
Jun 12, 2007
20,903
1,566
OK
✟50,603.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
because some men want to be justified and held as "better" or "more pure" than others. they subjugate people to feel this way. it's very simple. they just happen to be leaders of church and therefore can drag the rest of the masses with them.

anyone who knows Christ knows love is not stomping someone else under foot so you appear better.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
150 years ago: The abolition of slavery

100 years ago: The emancipation of women

50 years ago: Inter-racial marriage

Today: Same-sex relations

Why is it that the church always has to be dragged kicking and screaming (by secular outrage) towards the tolerance and compassion that, ironically, it claims to hold a monopoly on?
I don't see that the case at all. The ONLY reason women were able to come out of the harem was the influence of Biblical Hebrew and later Christian influences. Slaves existed before and they will likely exist again. It all depends on how we view our neighbors.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,429
7,166
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟426,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Christianity is so multi-faceted. You have to be specific about what type of Christian belief you're talking about. In America, some denominations have been in the lead in promoting progressive social causes, while others have supported the status quo. Slavery was strongly opposed by the New England Congregationalists, Unitarians, and Quakers. But the Southern Baptist denomination was founded because it believed in a pro-slavery doctrine. Same was true of women's suffrage, which was supported by Unitarian ,Universalist, and the Quaker churches and generally opposed by conservative Protestants and most (but not all) Catholics.

We see exactly the same pattern repeated today in the same-sex marraige issue. Almost always, it's been the liberal varieties of Christianity that support social change, while conservatives oppose it (and often claim those in support are not "real" Christians.)
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
As others have pointed out, in fairness there have been Christians on both sides of the issues.

There were Christians who were leading abolitionists in the South and there were Christian theologians who went around quoting bible passages to justify slavery to slaves and slave owners.

Just as with gay rights, there are Christians who are die-hard opposed to it and there are Christians who feel everyone should be treated equal
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,142
6,837
73
✟404,662.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I don't see that the case at all. The ONLY reason women were able to come out of the harem was the influence of Biblical Hebrew and later Christian influences. Slaves existed before and they will likely exist again. It all depends on how we view our neighbors.

If you think slavery does not exist today you have not been reading the headlines. And yes I'm talking about the U.S. and Western Europe, not just the third world.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Christianity has been part of the leading influence in supporting equal rights, and part of the leading influence in resisting equal rights.
True Christianity has been the good influence. Christian cults have been a bad influence. A cult is a closed society or group (hidding their thoughts) who want to exclude. True Christianity is all about wanting to include and promote open reasoning.

This is why True Christians are hated so. Communists, Socialists, many homosexuals, most Muslim nations, mormonism, moonies, are all about silencing open debate that questions their various agendas. They try to instill fear toward Christians who openly tell them that they are in error. I'm totally against violence and harassment and yet violence is the way of the cults. Even homosexualism is a cult out to silence any open opposition to the belief that homosexuality is not a generational sin founded in promiscuity, and adolescent habitual sexual contact. The very thing homosexuals seem to encourage among their peers.
 
Upvote 0

Meshavrischika

for Thy greater honor and glory
Jun 12, 2007
20,903
1,566
OK
✟50,603.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
True Christianity has been the good influence. Christian cults have been a bad influence. A cult is a closed society or group who want's to exclude. True Christianity is all about inclusion.
hahaha

it'd be interesting to see you list the "christian cults"... just to see what happens - lol
 
Upvote 0

Maren

Veteran
Oct 20, 2007
8,709
1,659
✟72,368.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
True Christianity has been the good influence. Christian cults have been a bad influence. A cult is a closed society or group who want's to exclude. True Christianity is all about inclusion.

So you are saying religions like the Southern Baptists and most fundamentalist sects are cults? These tend to be the ones that have led the opposition against civil rights.

By contrast, it is groups (as previously mentioned) like the Catholics, Methodists, Lutherans, etc. (typically the so-called liberal sects) that have supported civil rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheManeki
Upvote 0

Sitswithamouse

I look Time Lord
Mar 6, 2005
3,871
478
56
Devon, UK
✟28,926.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Greens
True Christianity has been the good influence. Christian cults have been a bad influence. A cult is a closed society or group who want's to exclude. True Christianity is all about inclusion.
What would you define a cult?
 
Upvote 0

Meshavrischika

for Thy greater honor and glory
Jun 12, 2007
20,903
1,566
OK
✟50,603.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
So you are saying religions like the Southern Baptists and most fundamentalist sects are cults? These tend to be the ones that have led the opposition against civil rights.

By contrast, it is groups (as previously mentioned) like the Catholics, Methodists, Lutherans, etc. (typically the so-called liberal sects) that have supported civil rights.
I'd say some fundamentalists and some liberal sects (some of those you listed) do not support rights for all. (being as currently they object to the homosexual thing)
 
Upvote 0

Maren

Veteran
Oct 20, 2007
8,709
1,659
✟72,368.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
I'd say some fundamentalists and some liberal sects (some of those you listed) do not support rights for all. (being as currently they object to the homosexual thing)

I would say in previous years it wasn't as clear. Of course, the Catholics 40 years ago were considered more liberal and recently have been becoming much more fundamentalist.

I would say that currently it is much more divided on a liberal/fundamentalist line.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If you think slavery does not exist today you have not been reading the headlines. And yes I'm talking about the U.S. and Western Europe, not just the third world.
Of course slavery exists today. The Democrats have proven that. Remember it was a Democrat who said that Obama was getting support because of his race. It was a Black minister who said that Mrs. Clinton was never called the "N" word. I would say that slavery is about being trapped in the mindset that it is about us vs. them mentality. Chains are chains....
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And how do you define True Christianity?
Only sinners saved by the grace of GOD through the death, burial, and resurection of the LORD JESUS CHRIST --- the GOOD NEWS open to all who willingly repent and believe.
 
Upvote 0