End of Matthew 2

[peterlindner]

There is an angel dream message that sends Joseph into the danger of "Archelaus did reign in Judaea in the room of his father Herod". Then there is a second dream. This one is from God. This one sends them to Galilee (safety).

God shows he can go direct. Are you getting your messages from angels? Daniel started out getting his messages and dream interpretations direct; then he started listening to angels and all 'ell broke loose.

The book of revelation is an angel dream (confusion).

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

There is an angel dream message that sends Joseph into the danger of "Archelaus did reign in Judaea in the room of his father Herod". Then there is a second dream. This one is from God. This one sends them to Galilee (safety).

God shows he can go direct. Are you getting your messages from angels? Daniel started out getting his messages and dream interpretations direct; then he started listening to angels and all 'ell broke loose.

The book of revelation is an angel dream (confusion).

My reading of the Matthew reference is different from yours. While in Egypt, Joseph received a dream to say that he could not return back to Israel (general). Because Joseph heard that Archelaus reigned in Judaea, he was afraid (understandably so) and warned in a dream (not necessarily from an angel) not to go to Judaea, so he withdrew to Galilee. So your interpretation that to listen to angels is dangerous is not supported by this reference.

 

[Johnny4ChristJesus]

There is an angel dream message that sends Joseph into the danger of "Archelaus did reign in Judaea in the room of his father Herod". Then there is a second dream. This one is from God. This one sends them to Galilee (safety).

God shows he can go direct. Are you getting your messages from angels? Daniel started out getting his messages and dream interpretations direct; then he started listening to angels and all 'ell broke loose.

The book of revelation is an angel dream (confusion).

So that is the conclusion you draw? Well, then if you are going to be consistent, you best be afraid, since Mary only listened to an angel, so maybe--IN YOUR THEOLOGY--Jesus wasn't who He claimed to be--since God didn't speak directly to her.

And, what if Heb 1:13-14 is actually true? Even Jesus was ministered to by angels.

In Ezekiel 14, The LORD speaks to Ezekiel and recognizes three individuals as righteous, by name. One of those is Daniel.

Do you think the one who claimed he was sent by God, in Daniel 11, and resisted by the prince of the kingdom of persia, was actually not an angel of God?

You may want to go re-think that errant theology. You are wrong.