Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have concluded that your alleged concern for the children and the unborn is merely a sham. If you were truly interested in them, you would not criticize a man who has devoted a couple of decades on behalf of the pro-life ad honorem—without any compensation.It makes little sense for God to be more concerned about a car that won't run, than the millions of much more needy of his people on this planet that could better use his help.
You might want to actually read your NASA link in its entirety. Revised estimates put it back in the range of the universe.The universe is in charge of someone older than the universe. And BTW, the universe is older than the date of the Big Bang. The evidence is in!
Ref.: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hd140283.html
“Previous research had estimated that the Milky Way galaxy's so-called "Methuselah star" is up to 16 billion years old. That's a problem, since most researchers agree that the Big Bang that created the universe occurred about 13.8 billion years ago. …”
Ref. http://www.space.com/20112-oldest-known-star-universe.html
From soup to cells — the origin of life
“Evolution encompasses a wide range of phenomena: from the emergence of major lineages, to mass extinctions, to the evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospitals today. However, within the field of evolutionary biology, the origin of life is of special interest because it addresses the fundamental question of where we (and all living things) came from. …”
Ref.: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/side_0_0/origsoflife_01
If tomorrow experts were to succeed in creating life from non-living matter, would you still argue that the origin of life is not an integral part of the theory of evolution?
Miller/Urey Experiment
“By the 1950s, scientists were in hot pursuit of the origin of life. Around the world, the scientific community was examining what kind of environment would be needed to allow life to begin. In 1953, Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey, working at the University of Chicago, conducted an experiment which would change the approach of scientific investigation into the origin of life. …”
Ref.: http://people.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/Exobiology/miller.html
The universe is in charge of someone older than the universe. And BTW, the universe is older than the date of the Big Bang. The evidence is in!
Ref.: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hd140283.html
“Previous research had estimated that the Milky Way galaxy's so-called "Methuselah star" is up to 16 billion years old. That's a problem, since most researchers agree that the Big Bang that created the universe occurred about 13.8 billion years ago. …”
Ref. http://www.space.com/20112-oldest-known-star-universe.html
He simply made the point that your car repair takes precedence over children who suffer and starve on a daily basis.
Did I claim that the car’s repair had precedence over the welfare of children. For someone who has invested twenty years with no pay on behalf of the unborn this represented an unfair response.
I was doing God’s work on behalf of the unborn, and you believe that it was wrong for God to help us get home that evening? I do not understand! It seems to me that you are the ones with upside down priorities! By helping us, the unborn children were also the recipients of said unexpected assistance from above.
God's free to help whomever he chooses. I just question what his priorities are.Did I claim that the car’s repair had precedence over the welfare of children. For someone who has invested twenty years with no pay on behalf of the unborn this represented an unfair response.
I was doing God’s work on behalf of the unborn, and you believe that it was wrong for God to help us get home that evening? I do not understand! It seems to me that you are the ones with upside down priorities! By helping us, the unborn children were also the recipients of said unexpected assistance from above.
False. No more than a quill wrote it.Who is said to twist words?
Unbelievers agree with believers. Men wrote it.
Possibly often it has to with His people, and even prayer.God's free to help whomever he chooses. I just question what his priorities are.
Fine thanks. The Evo aversion to truth and trying to hide the ugly truth of the package deal that evolution really is, simply warrants disgust.You alright?
What does experiments in regards to abiogenesis, have to do with the theory of evolution?
The origin of life is an integral part of the theory. If you are dealing with topic of ancestry, why would you stop with the first living cell. The logical question is: What was the ancestor of the first cell? If you can’t answer that query, then the entire theory is perhaps resting on shaky ground.
If your answer is: “God created the first cell,” then why not consider that he was also responsible for the creation of other life forms and adopt the “Common Design” explanation for what we see in nature? If science can’t account for the origin of life, then there should be no reason for rejecting the Common Design option.
What will experts do when they find even bigger objects and older in the distant regions of the universe? Will they keep adjusting the age of every older object they find to the age of the BB?You might want to actually read your NASA link in its entirety. Revised estimates put it back in the range of the universe.
Would that be evolution after they separated the early origin of life from it? And called it abiogenesis? One needs to simply ask where man came from. We know what evolution claims.Then show us all, how evolution discusses the origin of life in it's theory and why the theory is dependent on how the origin of life came to be.
And be specific please.
I don't get it, please explain.
I did! Should I post it again?Then show us all, how evolution discusses the origin of life in it's theory and why the theory is dependent on how the origin of life came to be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?