Embarrassing Evolution proofs

[morse86]

Java Man 1891: $cientist admitted later they took the skull bone of a gibbon and the leg bone of a human to "recreate" and "prove$$$" evolution (Java Man - Wikipedia)

Piltdown Man 1912: After fooling many "unable to critical think, can only parrot, peer review process participant" scientists for more than 40 years and "establishing" evolution theory, it was found to be a hoax. Someone had painted some bone fragments and filed down ape teeth to make it look more human. Yes, a couple of bone fragments was used to "reconstruct" the entire image ( Piltdown Man - Wikipedia)

Nebreaska Ape Man 1922: Someone found a tooth in the ground and created a fantastic mi$$ing link. After fooling "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establishing" evolution theory, it was later found out to be a tooth from a pig (Nebraska Man - Wikipedia)

Dino Bird 1999: A chinese farmer was able to fool many "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establish" evolution theory (Dino Hoax Was Mainly Made of Ancient Bird, Study Says)

Coelacent fish: This was the "mi$$$" link that fooled many scientists and "establish" evolution theory....only later it was discovered it's still alive (Coelacanth - Wikipedia)


DNA has proven evolution, we're 98% similar to chimpanzees: $$$cientists excluded 1.3 billion letters and compared the remaining 2.4 billion to get the 98% similar figure, this further "establish" evolution theory.


How many more "couple of bones in the dirt" will $$$cientists find to create fantastic CGI creatures to advance $$evolution$$$ theory? It only takes 1 bone to create an entire creature.....where is the peer review process?!?!??!?!?

 

[Haipule]

I think this is important because atheists use their "magic" science books to claim the bible is a "magic" book written by a "wizard in the sky".

Yet, their own "magic" science books are written by wizards with alphabet soup after their name like, "PHD". Insert your own joke here.

"Evolved from the sea as some goo that evolved into a male and female human at the same time?"

Talk about magic!

 

[looking_for_answers_]

Java Man 1891: $cientist admitted later they took the skull bone of a gibbon and the leg bone of a human to "recreate" and "prove$$$" evolution (Java Man - Wikipedia)

Piltdown Man 1912: After fooling many "unable to critical think, can only parrot, peer review process participant" scientists for more than 40 years and "establishing" evolution theory, it was found to be a hoax. Someone had painted some bone fragments and filed down ape teeth to make it look more human. Yes, a couple of bone fragments was used to "reconstruct" the entire image ( Piltdown Man - Wikipedia)

Nebreaska Ape Man 1922: Someone found a tooth in the ground and created a fantastic mi$$ing link. After fooling "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establishing" evolution theory, it was later found out to be a tooth from a pig (Nebraska Man - Wikipedia)

Dino Bird 1999: A chinese farmer was able to fool many "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establish" evolution theory (Dino Hoax Was Mainly Made of Ancient Bird, Study Says)

Coelacent fish: This was the "mi$$$" link that fooled many scientists and "establish" evolution theory....only later it was discovered it's still alive (Coelacanth - Wikipedia)


DNA has proven evolution, we're 98% similar to chimpanzees: $$$cientists excluded 1.3 billion letters and compared the remaining 2.4 billion to get the 98% similar figure, this further "establish" evolution theory.


How many more "couple of bones in the dirt" will $$$cientists find to create fantastic CGI creatures to advance $$evolution$$$ theory? It only takes 1 bone to create an entire creature.....where is the peer review process?!?!??!?!?

The peer review process is exactly how we know these were fakes. They were tested by other scientists, who used to scientific process to eventually determine the truth.

 

[Strathos]

No one touts those as proofs except creationist strawmen. BTW, you ever going to get around to explaining the Antarctic circumnavigation problem?

 

[Haipule]

The peer review process is exactly how we know these were fakes. They were tested by other scientists, who used to scientific process to eventually determine the truth.

It's funny how the "scientists" now give a mocking nod to Adam and Eve of the bible because of mitochondrial DNA.

Before DNA, Adam and Eve was completely absurd to them!

Now, at least, it is a "mocking nod"!

 

[Haipule]

No one touts those as proofs except creationist strawmen. BTW, you ever going to get around to explaining the Antarctic circumnavigation problem?

Ok, I'll bite. Please 'splain me the "Antarctic circumnavigation problem"?

I'm aware that some think the circumnavigation of the continent of Antarctica is larger than the circumference of the equator. I personally, hold no opinion.

 

[xianghua]

The peer review process is exactly how we know these were fakes. They were tested by other scientists, who used to scientific process to eventually determine the truth.

the problem is that those peer review papers fully support id and not evolution.

 

[xianghua]

I think this is important because atheists use their "magic" science books to claim the bible is a "magic" book written by a "wizard in the sky".

Yet, their own "magic" science books are written by wizards with alphabet soup after their name like, "PHD". Insert your own joke here.

"Evolved from the sea as some goo that evolved into a male and female human at the same time?"

Talk about magic!

according to evolution a frog can evolve into a prince too. even a part of feces (a bunch of bacteria) can evolve into a princess (human).

 

[Jimmy D]

Embarrassing indeed!

 

[Zoii]

Java Man 1891: $cientist admitted later they took the skull bone of a gibbon and the leg bone of a human to "recreate" and "prove$$$" evolution (Java Man - Wikipedia)

Piltdown Man 1912: After fooling many "unable to critical think, can only parrot, peer review process participant" scientists for more than 40 years and "establishing" evolution theory, it was found to be a hoax. Someone had painted some bone fragments and filed down ape teeth to make it look more human. Yes, a couple of bone fragments was used to "reconstruct" the entire image ( Piltdown Man - Wikipedia)

Nebreaska Ape Man 1922: Someone found a tooth in the ground and created a fantastic mi$$ing link. After fooling "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establishing" evolution theory, it was later found out to be a tooth from a pig (Nebraska Man - Wikipedia)

Dino Bird 1999: A chinese farmer was able to fool many "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establish" evolution theory (Dino Hoax Was Mainly Made of Ancient Bird, Study Says)

Coelacent fish: This was the "mi$$$" link that fooled many scientists and "establish" evolution theory....only later it was discovered it's still alive (Coelacanth - Wikipedia)


DNA has proven evolution, we're 98% similar to chimpanzees: $$$cientists excluded 1.3 billion letters and compared the remaining 2.4 billion to get the 98% similar figure, this further "establish" evolution theory.


How many more "couple of bones in the dirt" will $$$cientists find to create fantastic CGI creatures to advance $$evolution$$$ theory? It only takes 1 bone to create an entire creature.....where is the peer review process?!?!??!?!?

Havent you just proven the scientific process? Unwittingly youve shown how strong the scientific process is by the fact those attempted discoveries were unmasked (by scientists) as frauds.

 

[Zoii]

It's funny how the "scientists" now give a mocking nod to Adam and Eve of the bible because of mitochondrial DNA.

Before DNA, Adam and Eve was completely absurd to them!

Now, at least, it is a "mocking nod"!

It still is

 

[prodromos]

Yet, their own "magic" science books are written by wizards with alphabet soup after their name like, "PHD". Insert your own joke here.

Piled High and Deep?
This is only acquired after obtaining a BS (Bull S___) followed by an MS (More of the Same)

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

the problem is that those peer review papers fully support id and not evolution.

Really? Really?

 

[Jimmy D]

according to evolution a frog can evolve into a prince too. even a part of feces (a bunch of bacteria) can evolve into a princess (human).

And a car can evolve into a truck? And a penguin is an organic robot?

 

[Larniavc]

Java Man 1891: $cientist admitted later they took the skull bone of a gibbon and the leg bone of a human to "recreate" and "prove$$$" evolution (Java Man - Wikipedia)

Piltdown Man 1912: After fooling many "unable to critical think, can only parrot, peer review process participant" scientists for more than 40 years and "establishing" evolution theory, it was found to be a hoax. Someone had painted some bone fragments and filed down ape teeth to make it look more human. Yes, a couple of bone fragments was used to "reconstruct" the entire image ( Piltdown Man - Wikipedia)

Nebreaska Ape Man 1922: Someone found a tooth in the ground and created a fantastic mi$$ing link. After fooling "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establishing" evolution theory, it was later found out to be a tooth from a pig (Nebraska Man - Wikipedia)

Dino Bird 1999: A chinese farmer was able to fool many "unable to critical think, can only parrot" scientists and "establish" evolution theory (Dino Hoax Was Mainly Made of Ancient Bird, Study Says)

Coelacent fish: This was the "mi$$$" link that fooled many scientists and "establish" evolution theory....only later it was discovered it's still alive (Coelacanth - Wikipedia)


DNA has proven evolution, we're 98% similar to chimpanzees: $$$cientists excluded 1.3 billion letters and compared the remaining 2.4 billion to get the 98% similar figure, this further "establish" evolution theory.


How many more "couple of bones in the dirt" will $$$cientists find to create fantastic CGI creatures to advance $$evolution$$$ theory? It only takes 1 bone to create an entire creature.....where is the peer review process?!?!??!?!?

Are you the one who still thinks the Earth is flat?

 

[Larniavc]

It's funny how the "scientists" now give a mocking nod to Adam and Eve of the bible because of mitochondrial DNA.

It is still absurd. No biologist thinks Adam and Eve were the progenitors of humanity.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

It is still absurd. No biologist thinks Adam and Eve were the progenitors of humanity.

He probably means 'Y-chromosomal Adam' and 'mitochondrial 'Eve' - though I don't see it as mocking, they just use the familiar Biblical names for an analogous concept.

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

OP, did you actually read any of the links you provided? All of them explain quite clearly how these misidentifications and attempts to mislead were doubted very early on by scientists and then debunked by scientists in rather short order. Why didn't creationists catch and expose these hoaxes?

 

[looking_for_answers_]

Really? Really?

It was the peer review process and scientific method that revealed them as fakes, so yes

 

[looking_for_answers_]

And a car can evolve into a truck? And a penguin is an organic robot?

If cars could reproduce and mutations that moved them towards being a truck made them more likely to reproduce than other cars, yes, but I'm not sure what your point is. Also, you need to define what you mean by "robot" before answering the second question