Hans Blaster
Raised by bees
- Mar 11, 2017
- 22,149
- 16,659
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Rudy's shown himself to be entirely lacking in credibility".
I guess you never heard the cries for proof of 'widespread/rampant' voter fraud. Just might be politically advantageous to show such proof.
This country is 200+ years old. We have trends. People do not just check one box on the scale we are seeing. It is an unprecedented, mathematical impossibility.
You’re assuming it’s actually true, for one thing. But for another, people not completing their ballots isn’t all that rare.
More than 30 percent of voters fail to complete their ballots. Don't be one of them.
Not everyone fills out their ballot. In and of itself, that doesn’t prove anything.
When did you get a spot on the Trump administration legal team?I am assuming we can convince a Judged it is true. Or we can take a page out of the Democrat hand book and keep litigating the litigation by shopping for an appellate court that will eventually give us the ruling we are looking for.
I am assuming we can convince a Judged it is true. Or we can take a page out of the Democrat hand book and keep litigating the litigation by shopping for an appellate court that will eventually give us the ruling we are looking for.
When did you get a spot on the Trump administration legal team?
No it is not a mathematical impossibility. Math has nothing to do with it. Every ballot in existence could only have one box checked and it would be possible.
The last count I saw the "legal efforts" of the Trump insurgency were 0-10 on decided cases.
Is the isotope test of ballots in going to be included in court today or is that another one being held in reserve for reasons?That is an awesome defense... maybe you should contact your representatives. No doubt such logic will work wonders in the court of law.
That is an awesome defense... maybe you should contact your representatives. No doubt such logic will work wonders in the court of law.
Convince a judge of what?I am assuming we can convince a Judged it is true.
Given the way all these court cases have turned out so far, yeah, that seems to be the plan.Or we can take a page out of the Democrat hand book and keep litigating the litigation by shopping for an appellate court that will eventually give us the ruling we are looking for.
When did you get a spot on the Trump administration legal team?
We had a lot of new, or infrequent, voters in this election. Who says they know what to do. Some people are uncomfortable voting for persons they don't know about. (Others decide the party label is good enough.) I don't vote for unopposed candidates, generally.
Do you have any idea how quickly that changes once we prove what the Democrats are willing to do to win this election? It put's everything into a new light.
Yet are using we as if you’re involved in these court cases.This is an internet forum. I am posting my opinions.
This is an internet forum. I am posting my opinions.
Is the isotope test of ballots in going to be included in court today or is that another one being held in reserve for reasons?
Do you have any idea how quickly that changes once we prove what the Democrats are willing to do to win this election? It put's everything into a new light.
Except then the Democrats give evidence of how Pres. Trump claimed fraud in the 2016 and 2018 elections but never showed any evidence of it -- including the commission Pres. Trump set up specifically to find that voter fraud. Additionally, Pres. Trump has been talking for six months how, if he lost, it would be because of voter fraud. Yes, that puts everything in a new light -- particularly since he has been President for the last four years and has done little to nothing to prevent this "fraud" he claims happens every election.
Given the complete failure so far of Donald's legal team to convince judges, what do you base this assumption on?I am assuming we can convince a Judged it is true.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?