Election 2022 Results

Servus · Nov 10, 2022

Akita Suggagaki said:
People cannot be swayed by anything they do not already agree with these days. But what would be a more preferable way to identify such individuals?

Something that isn't obviously intended as a slur.

GreatLakes4Ever · Nov 10, 2022

Aldebaran said:
No proof of anything happening. Just a Russian guy making a claim.

How about from the FBI?
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS — FBI

Or the Republican majority 116th Senate?
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

GreatLakes4Ever said:
That actually happened Russia's Prigozhin admits interfering in U.S. elections

LONDON, Nov 7 (Reuters) - Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin said on Monday he had interfered in U.S. elections and would continue doing so in future...Prigozhin, who served nine years in prison in Soviet times for robbery and other crimes before going into business...

Russia's Prigozhin admits interfering in U.S. elections

So when a Russian criminal does it; American Conservatives should be stripped of their rights and censored; but when American Leftists do it; it's OK?

Aldebaran · Nov 10, 2022

GreatLakes4Ever said:
How about from the FBI?
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS — FBI

Or the Republican majority 116th Senate?
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf

The Russian guy that was being referenced was not listed on the FBI's site, or in the Senate report.

GreatLakes4Ever · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
LONDON, Nov 7 (Reuters) - Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin said on Monday he had interfered in U.S. elections and would continue doing so in future...Prigozhin, who served nine years in prison in Soviet times for robbery and other crimes before going into business...

Russia's Prigozhin admits interfering in U.S. elections

So when a Russian criminal does it; American Conservative should be stripped of their rights and censored; but when American Leftists do it; it's OK?

Well, Democrats are Americans so they get to participate in American elections. Russians are not Americans so they do not get to participate in American elections.

Aldebaran · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
LONDON, Nov 7 (Reuters) - Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin said on Monday he had interfered in U.S. elections and would continue doing so in future...Prigozhin, who served nine years in prison in Soviet times for robbery and other crimes before going into business...

Russia's Prigozhin admits interfering in U.S. elections

So when a Russian criminal does it; American Conservative should be stripped of their rights and censored; but when American Leftists do it; it's OK?

Absolutely. If American leftists do it, it's dismissed with a "But it wasn't enough to change the results."
If an American on the Right does it, even just to demonstrate that it's able to be done, they're charged with crimes, and then the demonstration of the fact that the election process is not secure is swept under the rug (denied).

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

GreatLakes4Ever said:
Well, Democrats are Americans so they get to participate in American elections. Russians are not Americans so they do not get to participate in American elections.

I would say that there is a big difference between trolling the internet, and participating in elections. However I consider buying election campaigns to be active participation.

Funny how speaking your mind is a threat to Democracy; but financing the overthow of elections seems to be fine with some Democrats.

Aldebaran · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
I would say that there is a big difference between trolling the internet, and participating in elections. However I consider buying election campaigns to be active participation.

Funny how speaking your mind is a threat to Democracy; but financing the overthow of elections seems to be fine with some Democrats.

I sense a reference to "Jan. 6th" coming. I can feel it!

GreatLakes4Ever · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
I would say that their is a big difference between trolling the internet, and participating in elections. However I consider buying election campaigns to be active participation.

Funny how speaking your mind is a threat to Democracy; but financing the overthow of elections seems to be fine with some Democrats.

You are currently the one saying Democrats speaking their mind on their preferred Republican nominee is a threat to Democracy.

There was no overthrow. Democrats didn’t make a single Republican vote a certain way in the primary. Each Republican did that on their own. And the Republicans voted for Trump endorsed candidates to be their nominee.

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

Aldebaran said:
I sense a reference to "Jan. 6th" coming. I can feel it!

It looks like some Democrats have a new angle for this new election. They can now blame Trump for Republican losses as a result of Democrat interference in the Republican primaries.

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

GreatLakes4Ever said:
There was no overthrow. Democrats didn’t make a single Republican vote a certain way in the primary.

They did the same thing that they censor Republicans for; as they blame it on the Russians. They influenced the Republican primaries. However what these Democrats did is far worse. They financed this overthrow of the Republican Primaries. If the Russians were doing that to the Democrats, their bank accounts would be frozen.

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

I look forward to a Republican Congress for a complete investigation.

Aldebaran · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
It looks like some Democrats have a new angle for this new election. They can now blame Trump for Republican losses as a result of Democrat interference in the Republican primaries.

Whew! Too much for me to process.

Aldebaran · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
I look forward to a Republican Congress for a complete investigation.

Would the House be able to do that on their own? We probably got the House, but the Senate is looking not all that likely, although still possible.

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

Aldebaran said:
Would the House be able to do that on their own? We probably got the House, but the Senate is looking not all that likely, although still possible.

Congress has the authority to conduct investigations “in aid of its legislative function.” That authority can extend to investigations for the purpose of deciding whether legislation is appropriate, to information gathering on matters of national importance

What, Exactly, Does Congress Have the Authority To Investigate?: MoloLamken LLP (ML) Law Firm / Attorneys

NxNW · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
financing the overthow of elections seems to be fine with some Democrats.

You might have a point if anything such thing was happening.

Bradskii · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
I say let supply and demand dictate the market.

I doubt that CA will catch up with TX. Like I said, TX has a fast growing solar industry, and we're already miles ahead with wind power.

But do you think it's a conscious decision we should make to head in that direction? Supply and demand works two ways. It reduces prices when supply is high but increases them when it's low. It's what is keeping gas prices high. Companies won't reduce profits to increase supply. So what about financial incentives for renenables?

Bradskii · Nov 10, 2022

HARK! said:
These same people seek to censor the 1st amendment rights of American's, with their fear mongering about the Russians influencing our elections; while they do exactly what they use as an excuse to undermine our liberty.

They've been exposed.

A complete non sequitor. Why not address the topic directly?

HARK! · Nov 10, 2022

Bradskii said:
But do you think it's a conscious decision we should make to head in that direction? Supply and demand works two ways. It reduces prices when supply is high but increases them when it's low. It's what is keeping gas prices high. Companies won't reduce profits to increase supply. So what about financial incentives for renenables?

High gas prices are incentives for competition from companies that are selling renewable energy.

That how free market economics works.

HARK! · Nov 11, 2022

Bradskii said:
A complete non sequitor. Why not address the topic directly?

I've addressed the topic directly, ad nauseam. I look forward to a Congressional investigation.

Election 2022 Results

<><

Well-Known Member

שמע

NCC-1701-A

Well-Known Member

NCC-1701-A

שמע

NCC-1701-A

Well-Known Member

שמע

שמע

שמע

NCC-1701-A

NCC-1701-A

שמע

Well-Known Member

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

שמע

שמע

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency