• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Status
Not open for further replies.

Protoevangel

Smash the Patriarchy!
Feb 6, 2004
11,662
1,248
Eugene, OR
✟40,797.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
In Relationship
Tetzel said:
Jim47 said:
Please believe me, I am not looking to insult nor debate, but have you not heard that many ELCA churches deny the Bible as being God's Word, they deny the ten commandments and say homo-sexual practices are O/k and I won't even bother with the other issues.
I don't make it a practice to believe rumors without evidence.

Extraordinary claims like yours require a lot of proof. Also, just because there might be a person here or there that says something does not make it official doctrine. A few weeks ago we had a guest-pastor at my LCMS church who said the earth is 6000 years old, but if one consults the LCMS webpage it says that there is no scripture that says the earth is not older. Does that mean that those who dislike the LCMS would be justified in claiming that the LCMS promotes fundamentalism because this one man said something that would be in agreement with many fundamentalists?
Hi Tetzel,

Actually, Jim hit the nail on the head. The evidence is all around, if you care to see it. From the statements on the ELCA Website, to the Seminary Textbooks, to the ELCA magazine, The historic Lutheran and even core Christian doctrine are being dissected and brought into question while ancient and modern heresies are being embraced.


edit: deleted repeated word

.
 
Upvote 0

C.F.W. Walther

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2005
3,571
148
80
MissourA
✟26,979.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
DanHead said:
Hi Tetzel,

The Lutheran, historic Lutheran and even core Christian doctrine are being dissected and brought into question while ancient and modern heresies are being embraced.

.

.


AAAAA----MENNNN:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
 
Upvote 0

Jim47

Heaven Bound
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2004
12,394
825
78
Michigan
✟92,237.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Tetzel said:
I don't make it a practice to believe rumors without evidence.

Extraordinary claims like yours require a lot of proof. Also, just because there might be a person here or there that says something does not make it official doctrine. A few weeks ago we had a guest-pastor at my LCMS church who said the earth is 6000 years old, but if one consults the LCMS webpage it says that there is no scripture that says the earth is not older. Does that mean that those who dislike the LCMS would be justified in claiming that the LCMS promotes fundamentalism because this one man said something that would be in agreement with many fundamentalists?

I'm not sure I entirely understand your statement. I was speaking about ELCA churchs, not LCMS.

Why would say I am guilty of spreading rumors? This is common knowledge. My own kin belong to one such church and the pastor had publicaly stated that he didn't believe the Bible was God's Word nor did he believe in God's creation.

Isn't it about time we quit candy coating sin and utter disbelief?

As I said before in other posts, I don't hate these people, I pray for them that they will see their errors and repent.

my past statement>
I am not looking to insult nor debate, but have you not heard that many ELCA churches deny the Bible as being God's Word, they deny the ten commandments and say homo-sexual practices are O/k and I won't even bother with the other issues.
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Jim47 said:
I'm not sure I entirely understand your statement. I was speaking about ELCA churchs, not LCMS.

Why would say I am guilty of spreading rumors? This is common knowledge. My own kin belong to one such church and the pastor had publicaly stated that he didn't believe the Bible was God's Word nor did he believe in God's creation.

Isn't it about time we quit candy coating sin and utter disbelief?

As I said before in other posts, I don't hate these people, I pray for them that they will see their errors and repent.

Jim,

I don't think that Tetzel misunderstood you but was using an LCMS example of what he thinks you did with your comments on the ELCA.

But I agree with you about the Candy coating of sin. And we do need to pray for our E?CA brothers and sisters in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Music4Hym777

Daughter of Christ
Apr 27, 2004
1,775
130
39
Arizona
✟25,229.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Republican
Jim47 said:
I'm not sure I entirely understand your statement. I was speaking about ELCA churchs, not LCMS.

Why would say I am guilty of spreading rumors? This is common knowledge. My own kin belong to one such church and the pastor had publicaly stated that he didn't believe the Bible was God's Word nor did he believe in God's creation.

Isn't it about time we quit candy coating sin and utter disbelief?

As I said before in other posts, I don't hate these people, I pray for them that they will see their errors and repent.

I will agree that there are very liberal ELCA churches that will tell you that and say those things. I once stepped foot into an ELCA church where the sermon was on how there is no such thing as God's will. But you also remember that there are other ELCA churches (the majority) that speak actual truth. They dont coat it, they speak law and gospel. I one time did an experiment, I went to an 8:00 (traditional) LC-MS church and then to a 10:30 (traditional) ELCA service, they were the EXACT same, same liturgy and all, I thought it was rather interesting.

I am not one to play sides on the different synods and you all know that.

I agree that the ELCA needs praying for. Some of the churches are going way to far off the deep end. The ones that need the most prayers are those that are RIC (Reconciling in Christ), they are the ones that are on the front lines of the LGBTQ movement.

On the flipside though I have seen some rather radical LC-MS churches, they are LCMS but I know that there is controversy about them being registered LCMS parishes. They seem to be on the front lines of over seas missions. I hadn't even thought that a Lutheran church would do that. It is not something that I am familiar with in the Lutheran church. Now I am very use to it in churches like the Missionary Church Alliance (where the entire mission of the church is to grow people up and send them over seas). Does anyone have anymore information on these LCMS churches?

Monica
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
SLStrohkirch said:
From now on I will no longer consider the E?CA Lutheran. Especially in light of the compromise that the church has made and will make in light of the BoC. They are discussing in a thread on their forum the subject of Confession-olatry. They feel that we put on par scripture with the confessions.

I think they feel that we treat our confessions the same way that Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox treat Tradition.

I feel they don't take them seriously enough. They constantly are ready to unsin sin in their desire to have unity for the sake of unity. They are truly a heterodox synod and no longer worthy of using the name Lutheran in anything that they do. Since this is on my forum I expect it not to be deleted.

I make only one apology to two persons whom I consider to be an exception to this and that is Danhead and MusicforHymn.

Just to set this straight The Word of God is the norma normans and the Book of Concord is the Normans normatta. It is an exposition of the Christian faith only. If one studies the Book of Concord they will realize that it is totally scriptural in content and context. I make no apologies for what I believe, but I apologetically defend my faith to my death.

In a conversation with filosofer in the main forum he made the case for not labeling the ELCA the E?CA. I therefore will not use the label as I suggested I would in the title. I have even changed the title of the thread though it won't show up in the page of threads that way. I do not hold those of you in an ELCA congregation in any contempt, but I do hold the leadership of your synod to be responsible for the poor witness I believe they are giving by their constant compromises over the past 17 years.

Scott
 
Upvote 0

Jim47

Heaven Bound
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2004
12,394
825
78
Michigan
✟92,237.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
SLStrohkirch said:
In a conversation with filosofer in the main forum he made the case for not labeling the ELCA the E?CA. I therefore will not use the label as I suggested I would in the title. I have even changed the title of the thread though it won't show up in the page of threads that way. I do not hold those of you in an ELCA congregation in any contempt, but I do hold the leadership of your synod to be responsible for the poor witness I believe they are giving by their constant compromises over the past 17 years.

Scott

Scott

This is very admirable for you to do that, however, everyone of them has a Bible and knows how to read. They have chosen to follow their leaders rather than seek the truth as God's Word tells us.

My Pastor has told us many times that if He should ever start preaching anything but the whole truthes of the Bible that it was our duties first to discuss it with him, and if it could not be resolved, that we should look elsewhere for a church that did preach all of God's Word and adhere to it.

There are very few that have admited that their church is wrong, only Dan and Monica that I know of. Dan is I believe looking for another church, and Monica says her own church does teach close to the LCMS beliefs.

Where are the rest?

Didn't God warn us not to follow crowds that do wrong?
 
Upvote 0

RedneckAnglican

Once again...the Outsyder...
Feb 5, 2005
10,817
495
54
San Antonio, Texas
Visit site
✟35,899.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
SLStrohkirch said:
I do not hold those of you in an ELCA congregation in any contempt, but I do hold the leadership of your synod to be responsible for the poor witness I believe they are giving by their constant compromises over the past 17 years.

Scott

me, too...some of us are working to change that...
 
Upvote 0

ctobola

Active Member
Sep 30, 2004
357
12
Fargo
✟562.00
Faith
Lutheran
DanHead said:
...
The evidence is all around, if you care to see it. From the statements on the ELCA Website, to the Seminary Textbooks....
...


Dan,

Just an informational comment about the textbook issue....

I'm not sure if you're referring to an "urban myth" that's floating around about a textbook supposedly used at ELCA seminaries called Christian Dogmatics; regardless, here are a couple points to consider:

1. Every professor chooses his/her own textbooks and they change frequently -- there are no "official" textbooks that professors are required to use.

2. Textbooks are almost never totally used. For example, when I taught a class a couple years ago, my announcement to the class the first day when something like this. "Please open the XYZ textbook to chapter 6. Using a pencil, please clearly note that the information in this chapter is completely inconsistent with current standards. If you use this information in your papers or on the test, you will lose points." (I chose that particular textbook become some of the other sections were well written and note available in other places.)

3. To assume that "one of their textbooks says this, so this is what they believe" is a significant error, particularly in graduate education.
In primary and seconday school people are taught what to think -- "In 1492, Columbus discovered North America." In undergraduate and graduate education (and a typical seminary degree is a graduate degree), they teach students how to think -- "What arguments and historic evidence might be used to demonstrate Columbus' motivation for sailing to North America?"

4. Professors frequently assign readings that cover different perspectives -- sometimes even radically different -- on a particular topic. Understanding the various positions, even ones that could be considered wrong or outdated, is part of learning "how to think."
Once again an example from my own experience... Several years ago, I taught a graduate class and we used three different textbooks, each presenting completely different (and contrary) view on a particular topic. (I've been in classes where up to eight textbooks were used.) There was a view in one of the textbooks that I think is right, but it was important to understand all of the views to understand how/why one of the views was superior.

Anyway, I just wanted to clarify why "they use THAT textbook" is a meaningless and unfair statement that seems to keep floating around.

Thanks for listening!

In Christ, -Cloy
 
Upvote 0

night2day

Sola Scriptura~Sola Gratia~Sola Fide
Aug 18, 2004
1,873
113
56
Home
Visit site
✟2,758.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Music4Hym777 said:
I will agree that there are very liberal ELCA churches that will tell you that and say those things. I once stepped foot into an ELCA church where the sermon was on how there is no such thing as God's will. But you also remember that there are other ELCA churches (the majority) that speak actual truth. They dont coat it, they speak law and gospel. I one time did an experiment, I went to an 8:00 (traditional) LC-MS church and then to a 10:30 (traditional) ELCA service, they were the EXACT same, same liturgy and all, I thought it was rather interesting.

It can't be said the same of all churches within either Synod. One only needs to look at what each publically and officially teaches and who they fellowship with. Not even are the various church districts the same within the differing parts of the country. For example, many of the northeast coast districts of the LCMS are rather liberal while many of the midwestern districts are not.

To do a thorough experiment, you would probabaly have to attend quite a few LCMS and ELCA churches. Some would be as expected. Some may be the oppisite as one may expect.

A friend of ours from one of the churches where my father had been a minister had visited us and relayed what she saw when she was at the church in Kirkwood, where Kieshnick, the synodical president, is pastor. Can anyone say "megachurch"? The way she described almost everything was not designed for a worship sevice...but for a show and entertainment.

But then, this is one who feels remaining within sound Biblical doctrine isn't important...it's missions. However, how will one properly be able to able to spread the Law and Gospel if they don't know what sound Biblical doctrine is?

I am not one to play sides on the different synods and you all know that.

I personally tend to be much more critical about my own. :)

I agree that the ELCA needs praying for. Some of the churches are going way to far off the deep end. The ones that need the most prayers are those that are RIC (Reconciling in Christ), they are the ones that are on the front lines of the LGBTQ movement.

ELCA first allowed women ministers...then homosexuals into ministery. Whether active or not , what ELCA offically did was first state God's word can be changed. And then they opened themselves up to pulpit and alter fellowship with two other denominations who have fully accepted homosexual practices as acceptable.

Then state someone's perception of themselves should be fully accepted. People dealing with temptation of any type, including homosexuality, does not make them guilty of that sin. They're only guilty of that sin if they fall into that sin. However, like all sin there is forgiveness offered. But that by no means excuses encourging or accepting that sin.

My brother knows a campus pastor. During an event for college-age LCMS Lutherans there was a RIC table there filled with leaflets seeking for youth to join in. I have to wonder just how that table got there. As I recall there were other speakers there from other denominations. I can perhaps understand one or two depending on the subject. Such as when one of the speakers was Joni Erikson Tada regarding issues of the sanctity of life (even though there is "Lutherans for Life" and mayhaps Gene Gartan could have been called.) But more than a handful...and I have to ask how can it be termed as a Lutheran event?

On the flipside though I have seen some rather radical LC-MS churches, they are LCMS but I know that there is controversy about them being registered LCMS parishes. They seem to be on the front lines of over seas missions...Does anyone have anymore information on these LCMS churches?

I haven't heard of those...at least in the sense of over-seas missions. What I have heard more of were mission churches. LCMS-speak of stating "church growth" as well as focusing on "megachurches".

But again...sound doctrine and the Great Commision were meant to go hand in hand as Christ Commanded. Not "mission first, be concerned with Biblical doctrine later".

Updated: Almost forgot to add, I read recently these "mission churches" the center of the LCMS speaks of is referring to churches building sister churches and those churches build more churches. They're not referring to the more known form in which a new congergation would form from another congergation in which the previous became too large and simply prayed anc called on a pastor and became a mission congergation.

From what I read it appeared more on center in on more missions....build more churches. But don't look into more into what these churches are teaching. Quanity over quality.
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I want to state again that I in no way have anything against those that belong to an ELCA congregation. My beef is with the Synod Leadership and especially Bishop Hansen. If I lead anyone to believe that I was against anyone particular layperson I apologize for misleading you. That was not my intent.
 
Upvote 0

Music4Hym777

Daughter of Christ
Apr 27, 2004
1,775
130
39
Arizona
✟25,229.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Republican
SLStrohkirch said:
I want to state again that I in no way have anything against those that belong to an ELCA congregation. My beef is with the Synod Leadership and especially Bishop Hansen. If I lead anyone to believe that I was against anyone particular layperson I apologize for misleading you. That was not my intent.

I'll admit that alot of the national leadership needs to be replaced and some stuff go on at that level, but I know that some of the regional synod bishops are awesome. Ours (Grand Canyon Synod) is excellent! He gave probably one of the best sermons I have ever heard, full of law and gospel. The only other two sermons that stick out more in my mind are theo one of "There is no such thing as God's Will" and "If Mary were my Daughter" (I really wish I had a tape of the "If Mary was my Daughter" sermon. It was a really good advent one, putting the birth of Jesus in modern times. The pastor basically made us to believe that his 13 year old daughter had gotten pregnant by the power of the holy spirit through one of his great stories (he uses stories alot, some from personal experience, from books, from the Bible), it was a really powerful sermon to think, what would it be like for Mary's family?)

Both synods have issues that they need to deal with, and yes my church is very LCMSish, you would think that you were in an LCMS service until it came time for communion (open) they even have private confession available after each service.
 
Upvote 0

ctobola

Active Member
Sep 30, 2004
357
12
Fargo
✟562.00
Faith
Lutheran
Music,

Could you provide sources for numbers 3 through 5? These are certainly contrary to my experiences/understandings, but if you have statistics I'd certainly be willing to hear about them.

Thanks!

In Christ, -Cloy


Music4Hym777 said:
...snip...
Major differences are

1. Women as pastors (ELCA says yes, LCMS says no)
2. Open Communion (ELCA says yes, LCMS says no)
3. Womens right to choose (ELCA says yes, LCMS says no)
4. Confession and absolution are seen alot more in the LCMS then the ELCA
5. Confirmation, the ELCA has become really relaxed and really hardly uses the Small Catechism. Where as the LCMS holds really hard too it.
...snip...
 
Upvote 0

Protoevangel

Smash the Patriarchy!
Feb 6, 2004
11,662
1,248
Eugene, OR
✟40,797.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
In Relationship
ctobola said:
Music,

Could you provide sources for numbers 3 through 5? These are certainly contrary to my experiences/understandings, but if you have statistics I'd certainly be willing to hear about them.

Thanks!

In Christ, -Cloy

As far as #3 goes, the ELCA approving of the murder of innocent children (as long as they aren't born yet):
The ELCA has a number of "exceptions", allowing for this murder. The LCMS, to the best of my knowledge, does not. Also, the ELCA insurance plan coveres elective baby-murder for pastors and professional church workers.

A prety good Analysis of the ELCA Social Statement on Abortion can be found at Lutherans for Life. It is in PDF format (You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software to read it).

Or if you click here, I have linked from Google, converting the PDF to HTML so your browser can view it. (this may or may not work)


 
Upvote 0

filosofer

Senior Veteran
Feb 8, 2002
4,752
290
Visit site
✟6,913.00
Faith
Lutheran
DanHead said:
As far as #3 goes, the ELCA approving of the murder of innocent children (as long as they aren't born yet):
The ELCA has a number of "exceptions", allowing for this murder. The LCMS, to the best of my knowledge, does not. Also, the ELCA insurance plan coveres elective baby-murder for pastors and professional church workers.

A prety good Analysis of the ELCA Social Statement on Abortion can be found at Lutherans for Life. It is in PDF format (You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software to read it).

Or if you click here, I have linked from Google, converting the PDF to HTML so your browser can view it. (this may or may not work)



The LCMS says that in extremely rare situations (and they indeed are rare), when the life of the mother is threatened, there may be a decision made that is characterized as the "lesser of two evils".
 
Upvote 0

Tetzel

Veteran
Nov 19, 2004
1,387
84
✟25,575.00
Faith
Lutheran
DanHead said:
As far as #3 goes, the ELCA approving of the murder of innocent children (as long as they aren't born yet):
The ELCA has a number of "exceptions", allowing for this murder. The LCMS, to the best of my knowledge, does not.


"A. The LCMS believes that abortion is contrary to God's Word and "is not a moral option except, except as a tragically unavoidable byproduct of medical procedures necessary to prevent the death of another human being, viz., the mother" (1979 Res. 3-02A). Official synodical resolutions and other materials on this topic are available from the Synod's Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR)."
http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=2120

 
Upvote 0

night2day

Sola Scriptura~Sola Gratia~Sola Fide
Aug 18, 2004
1,873
113
56
Home
Visit site
✟2,758.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Tetzel said:
"A. The LCMS believes that abortion is contrary to God's Word and "is not a moral option except, except as a tragically unavoidable byproduct of medical procedures necessary to prevent the death of another human being, viz., the mother" (1979 Res. 3-02A). Official synodical resolutions and other materials on this topic are available from the Synod's Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR)."
http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=2120

Quite easy to understand really. The basis is from the commandment "Thou shall not murder" which applies to the sacredness God has placed on human life, from conception until natural death....regardless whatever condition he or she may hold. This addresses anything from abortion to euthenasia, and all other assortment of issues.

Society has gotten into the habit of placing judgments on whether a person should live or die based on their "quality of life". God calls us to do much better than that. The late synodical president Dr. A.L. Barry wrote one of the aforementioned materials -- a document on The President's Commission on the Sanctity of Life while in office. It explains the LCMS stance rather well.

"(Life) has measureless value, because every individual, at every state of development and every state of consciousness, is known and loved by God. This is the source of human dignity and the basis for human equality. It must therefore be asserted without exception or qualification: no one is worthless who God has created and for whom Christ died."

-- Quote cited given within the 60th Synodical Regular Convention
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
night2day said:
Quite easy to understand really. The basis is from the commandment "Thou shall not murder" which applies to the sacredness God has placed on human life, from conception until natural death....regardless whatever condition he or she may hold. This addresses anything from abortion to euthenasia, and all other assortment of issues.

Society has gotten into the habit of placing judgments on whether a person should live or die based on their "quality of life". God calls us to do much better than that. The late synodical president Dr. A.L. Barry wrote one of the aforementioned materials -- a document on The President's Commission on the Sanctity of Life while in office. It explains the LCMS stance rather well.

"(Life) has measureless value, because every individual, at every state of development and every state of consciousness, is known and loved by God. This is the source of human dignity and the basis for human equality. It must therefore be asserted without exception or qualification: no one is worthless who God has created and for whom Christ died."

-- Quote cited given within the 60th Synodical Regular Convention


Let's just hope that Kieschnick &Co don't undo all of that.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.