A site I hit today proposes this,
1. We promote understanding of and mutual respect for the many differences in forms of worship.
2. We seek creative, practical ways for shared worship among member bodies, in order to overcome some of our sense of separation for one another.
I read in the Book of Revelation the following examples of different churches:
Ephesus:
They left their first love.
Smyrna:
Church of martyrdom, persecution, suffering, and poverty
Pergamos:
Married to the world. The world infiltrated the church. Mixed doctrines.
Thyatira:
Continual sacrifice. Ungodly doctrines mixed in.
Sardis:
The "dead" church. Few not defiled. The Reformation.
Philadelphia:
Church of brotherly love.
Laodicea:
Sensual, Church of lukewarmnessspewed out.
(A Laodicean church will often use the world's sensuality to entice people in...their music, their sensual stage antics, the sensual cooing of words, likening a relationship with their "Christ" to that with a lover in the bedroom. This they parade about with latest fashionable sensual attire.
There is a lot there to absorb but none the less, I see a vast comparison between different churches in Biblical times. We would have to agree that the differences are even more vast today than they were when this book was written.
So my question is, can there truly be an ecumenical form of worship without the compromise of some of ones foundational or systematic beliefs? Is ecumenical worship a straw dog? The word clearly states that it is Gods desire to see us worship in unity. Does that unity truly exist between a (example) Universalistic believer and a hard line Predestination believer?
1. We promote understanding of and mutual respect for the many differences in forms of worship.
2. We seek creative, practical ways for shared worship among member bodies, in order to overcome some of our sense of separation for one another.
I read in the Book of Revelation the following examples of different churches:
Ephesus:
They left their first love.
Smyrna:
Church of martyrdom, persecution, suffering, and poverty
Pergamos:
Married to the world. The world infiltrated the church. Mixed doctrines.
Thyatira:
Continual sacrifice. Ungodly doctrines mixed in.
Sardis:
The "dead" church. Few not defiled. The Reformation.
Philadelphia:
Church of brotherly love.
Laodicea:
Sensual, Church of lukewarmnessspewed out.
(A Laodicean church will often use the world's sensuality to entice people in...their music, their sensual stage antics, the sensual cooing of words, likening a relationship with their "Christ" to that with a lover in the bedroom. This they parade about with latest fashionable sensual attire.
There is a lot there to absorb but none the less, I see a vast comparison between different churches in Biblical times. We would have to agree that the differences are even more vast today than they were when this book was written.
So my question is, can there truly be an ecumenical form of worship without the compromise of some of ones foundational or systematic beliefs? Is ecumenical worship a straw dog? The word clearly states that it is Gods desire to see us worship in unity. Does that unity truly exist between a (example) Universalistic believer and a hard line Predestination believer?