Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Behaviour isn't observable phenomena?It attempts to. Our postmodern culture simply assumes we can measure constructs the way we can measure actual things. The amount of math we go through trying to represent those hise constructs in a study resembles s Rube Goldberg device. Science is s process for observable phdnomena. Start measuring constructs and you're going to have limited success with application and replication.
Behaviour isn't observable phenomena?
You can imagine all you like.Behavior is an observable phenomena and can even be predicted if one has higher knowledge than the being that is under observation.
We observe animals and can easily predict their behavior. Therefore, its not difficult for me to imagine a being higher than myself that can observe me and predict what I'm going to do.
Animals can trust that humans who just want to observe them are not going to hurt them. This would then imply that I can trust that the higher being observing me does not want to hurt me, but only teach me.
You can imagine all you like.
Animals are not capable of believing, which is why we could never prove to them that we just want to observe and not hurt them. Humans are capable of believing, which is why its reasonable to believe that there is higher beings than ourselves who can observe us and just want to teach us. This is reasonable because we observe a similar relationship between man and animals and even man and children.
How does that follow? Your argument seems to be missing several steps.Animals are not capable of believing, which is why we could never prove to them that we just want to observe and not hurt them. Humans are capable of believing, which is why its reasonable to believe that there is higher beings than ourselves who can observe us and just want to teach us. This is reasonable because we observe a similar relationship between man and animals and even man and children.
My cats believe that I will feed them. That's why they pester me and not my wife.
Like an observable higher beingHow does that follow? Your argument seems to be missing several steps.
How does that follow? Your argument seems to be missing several steps.
How does that follow? Your argument seems to be missing several steps.
You haven't even shown that it makes sense. You've just asserted it.I only offer arguments that make sense because I can't prove any of this, but since it makes sense, its easier to believe until proven wrong.
You haven't even shown that it makes sense. You've just asserted it.
Apologies, random thoughtSuch as?
"Might be true."You can freely deny an assertion that might actually be true, that is your choice.
"Might be true."You haven't done a thing to show that it is true or that we should believe it.
You haven't shown that it makes sense. You've just asserted it, again and again.I've made sense of life and have offered you a chance to believe what makes sense and you have denied that it makes sense. I can't control your free will to deny what makes sense and neither can God.
You haven't shown that it makes sense. You've just asserted it, again and again.
More empty assertions from you.Does Stephen Hawking assert that God does not need to exist? Yet the only way to make sense of this is to create imaginary concepts. Its a good thing we all have brains and don't have to rely on Stephen Hawking's or anyone else's brain to realize whats true.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?