Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, just as you ignored my question.
Fair enough?
Don't feel too bad, I'm ignoring "what?" guy too.Guess I'm just not in the mood for it all today
Sorry.That's par.
If things are complicated, you disregard them?Sorry.
I'm not here to read big, long Chatty Cathy posts.
For one, it makes me think you've got something to hide.
If you can't make your point or answer a simple question in a sentence or two, then I get suspicious.
I'm not interested in five screens worth of why someone doesn't accept evidence for God.If things are complicated, you disregard them?
This news is going to surprise nobody.
As everyone no doubt keeps telling you, those things are evidence for the existence of religions, not for the truth of any particular religion. Nobody is claiming religions don't exist.I'm not interested in five screens worth of why someone doesn't accept evidence for God.
It's enough just to admit you don't accept it.
Holidays, churches, martyrs mean nothing to atheists and scientists.
So what? What if the question is never answered?Logical fallacies?
Gotta say, some of you are entirely to dependent on that term, as well as a few others. Sorry but is just doesn't cover everything like you think it does.
For instance...it doesn't answer the question.
Not a single one of them requires the laws of nature to be suspended.
Which of the hypotheses for the origin of life requires 'nothing to come out of nowhere'?
Then perhaps refrain from posting, until you are in the mood.
Because beliefs that can't be objectively supported, and based on arguments from incredulity should be discarded.OK, thanks, Nith.
It's not enough for you, and I get that, but that doesn't mean it's a "logical fallacy, and I know you didn't call it that but fact it its at the very least a logical possibility, and so much so, many feel it's logical enough they are happy with calling it fact.
Believe what you believe but constantly throwing the F word at it doesn't make it that. That's not necessarily directed at you, I just figure it would be wasted if I directed it at the source....too far gone.
Nothing new? No it isn't, but it is a reminder with all the goings on here and constantly trying to put creation down, others don't have a better explanation. And maybe I'm bias but I really believe if I had never been exposed to either side of this from the time I was born and was presented the two possibilities then had to choose one or the other, I'd have to choose intelligent design, just makes a lot more logical sense. And again, I know you disagree but that doesn't mean you are right, and until you guys can do better, I guess I just don't see the point of coming here messing with our God, or our beliefs?
Not the ones I'm talking about.As everyone no doubt keeps telling you, those things are evidence for the existence of religions,
I'd say you're pointing in the wrong direction.No, just pointing out the obvious.
We're not trying to explain where the laws of nature came from!And that has led you to what conclusion? See, with no explanation to where the laws of nature originated, you have very little, so might be a good idea to realize you can't use the laws of nature to explain where the laws of nature came from because at one time there may have been no laws of nature.
All of them. Not a single serious hypothesis for the origin of life requires 'nothing to come out of nowhere'. Only one 'explanation' for the origin of life requires complex acids and sugars to magically appear out of nowhere, and that's your explanation.Which one doesn't?
Not the ones I'm talking about.
JOY TO THE WORLD is not evidence for Buddha.
CHRISTMAS and EASTER are not holidays to celebrate Allah.
April 1st is not ... (skip that one).
JESUS IS MY PILOT does not testify of Hinduism.
The SALVATION ARMY was not started to venerate Charles Darwin.
Et cetera.
Holidays, churches, martyrs mean nothing to atheists and scientists.
And that has led you to what conclusion? See, with no explanation to where the laws of nature originated, you have very little, so might be a good idea to realize you can't use the laws of nature to explain where the laws of nature came from because at one time there may have been no laws of nature.
Which one doesn't?
You guys don't realize it, but you're QEDing the OP.Ow, I dunno about that....
- Holidays: an excuse to sleep in and/or party
- Churches: art in architectural form; cultural heritage
I consider both quite meaningfull...
Even some martyr stories, I can appreciate in terms of the romantic / story telling value.
AV, the world isn't as black and white as you seem to think it is.
For all intents and purposes, as far as you are concerned, I have. But you have to understand you aren't the only poster here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?