- Oct 12, 2003
- 5,927
- 143
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- UK-Greens
How many nights between 'good' 'friday' and 'easter' 'sunday' ?
Do you see there are two? [Hebrew nights being of the same number as Roman-style ones]
What did Jesus say he would leave as his sign? [Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.]
is there a difference between two and three nights when one is giving a sign to people from God about corrupt religion?
are Jesus' signs of any meaning ?
Might one compare this with Jesus keeping passover with his disciples a day earlier than the tradition of the Jewish hierarchy, showing them they were wrong by scripture just as modern Christianity does not reprove itself to what Jesus said , let alone the whole Word of God?
Is this scripture from Paul of any meaning to modern divided traditions labelled Christian whatever - Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Who divided Christianity separating it from the beliefs of those who gave up sin to follow Christ - 2 Timothy 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity. ?
Which is stronger for most people, the words of Jesus, the saints and the prophets as one integral word of God [necessarily one else it is not of God], or grossly divided and differing countless traditions of religion? [which are far from one, but prophesied by Jesus himself eventually to become one united belief in one religion under the antichrist figure - Rev 13:3-4 ....and all the world wondered after the beast and they worshipped the dragon ] ?
Is the real evidence from scripture in Jesus own words of any meaning any longer in thus-paganised religion labelled by his name ?
One obviously cannot stop the falling away from Jesus' teachings in scripture because Jesus himself said it must come first, but how is it that almost all ignore Jesus' witness in scripture in plain words, preferring dogma and ritual that is familiar, habitual, pagan traditions dressed up, so clearly contradicting what is written, as having anything to do with the truth of God in scripture on which the tradition yet pretends to be based?
Is it not possible to see that all contradictions cannot be true, however familiar and common the tradition of believing them today ?
Does not the scripture itself show that Jesus set passover as his memorial which very few keep any longer , preferring traditions based upon paganism that make Jesus out to have FAILED to keep his promise about the sign of Jonah? :-
Matthew 26:18 And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep the passover at thy house with my disciples.
Luke 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
Do you see there are two? [Hebrew nights being of the same number as Roman-style ones]
What did Jesus say he would leave as his sign? [Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.]
is there a difference between two and three nights when one is giving a sign to people from God about corrupt religion?
are Jesus' signs of any meaning ?
Might one compare this with Jesus keeping passover with his disciples a day earlier than the tradition of the Jewish hierarchy, showing them they were wrong by scripture just as modern Christianity does not reprove itself to what Jesus said , let alone the whole Word of God?
Is this scripture from Paul of any meaning to modern divided traditions labelled Christian whatever - Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Who divided Christianity separating it from the beliefs of those who gave up sin to follow Christ - 2 Timothy 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity. ?
Which is stronger for most people, the words of Jesus, the saints and the prophets as one integral word of God [necessarily one else it is not of God], or grossly divided and differing countless traditions of religion? [which are far from one, but prophesied by Jesus himself eventually to become one united belief in one religion under the antichrist figure - Rev 13:3-4 ....and all the world wondered after the beast and they worshipped the dragon ] ?
Is the real evidence from scripture in Jesus own words of any meaning any longer in thus-paganised religion labelled by his name ?
One obviously cannot stop the falling away from Jesus' teachings in scripture because Jesus himself said it must come first, but how is it that almost all ignore Jesus' witness in scripture in plain words, preferring dogma and ritual that is familiar, habitual, pagan traditions dressed up, so clearly contradicting what is written, as having anything to do with the truth of God in scripture on which the tradition yet pretends to be based?
Is it not possible to see that all contradictions cannot be true, however familiar and common the tradition of believing them today ?
Does not the scripture itself show that Jesus set passover as his memorial which very few keep any longer , preferring traditions based upon paganism that make Jesus out to have FAILED to keep his promise about the sign of Jonah? :-
Matthew 26:18 And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The Master saith, My time is at hand; I will keep the passover at thy house with my disciples.
Luke 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
Last edited:
Upvote
0