- Oct 28, 2010
- 8,891
- 301
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
Easter (πάσχa, a Gr. form of the Heb, and
so Latinized by the Vulgate paschal), i. e. Passover Easter is a word of Saxon origin, and imports a goddess of the Saxons, or, rather, of the East, Εstera, in honor of whom sacrifices being annually offered about the Passover time of the year (spring), the name became attached by association of ideas tο the Christian festival "of the resurrection, which happened at the time of the Passover:
hence we say Easterday, Easter Sunday, but very improperly ; as we by no means refer the festival then kept tο the goddess of the ancient Saxons. SO the present German word for Easter, Os tern, is referred tο the same goddess, Est era Carnet, s. ν. The occurrence of this word in the a. V. of Acts xii, 4" Intending after Easter tο bring him forth tο the ρeορle is chiefly nοtieeable as an examρle of the want οf consistency in the translators.
In the earlier English version so Easter had been frequently used as the translation of πάσχ x. at the last revision Passover was substituted in all passages but this. I t would seem from this, and from the use of such words as " robbers of churches" (Acts xi x, 37),), " town clerk" (xix, 35), " sergeant¢" (xvi, 35), " deputy" (xiii, r, etc.), as if the Acts of the Apostles had &lien into the hands of a translator who acted on the principle οf choosing, not the most. correct, but the most familiar equivalents (comp. Trench, Q the Authοrizεd Version of the N. Τ. e. 21).Smith, s, v. Acts xii, 4.
EASΤER, CELEBRAΤIOΝ or. In the ancient Church the seventh day of Passion weep (q. v.), the greet Sabbath, as it was called, was observed with rigorous ρre + debated by night ; and the vigils continued eded till ceά<mwing, the hoar at which it is suppoour Lord rem. at this hoar the stillness of these midnight vigils was broken by the joyful acclamation to the"Τhe Lord is risen! The Lord is risen!
The Lord is risen indeed " the day of Εaster was celebrated with eνer demonstration of joy as a second jubilee. There was a solemn celebration of the Lord's Supper; the baptism of catechisms; appropriate salutations, and demonstrations of joy ; the liberation of prisoners, end the mannerism of slaves. Charίtίes were disposed tο the needy. Cents of justice were closed.
The heathen were forbidden tο celebrate public sρecticales in ceder that the devotions of Christians might not be interrupted. The week following was considered as a continuatiοn of the festival. During this time, those who had been baρtised at Easter continued waived in white, in token of that purity of life tο which they were bound by baptism.
On the Sunday follοwing they laid aside their garments of white, and were welcomed as members of the Church.Βingham, prey. tcεls. bk. x:a, ch. ν.
ΕASΤΕR there was much contention in the early Church as tο the days οn whίch our Lord's resurrection ought to be celebrated. Churches of Μonks celebrated the death of the Lord on the day corresponding tο the 14th of the month Νisan, οn which day, according to the opίnίon the whole ancient Church, the crucifixiοn took place.
The Western churches, on the other hand, were of opinion that the crucifixion should be annually commemorated on the particular day of the week on which it occured, that is, Friday. The resurrection was agreeably commemorated by the former ρarty on the day corresροnding tο the 16th of Νisan, and by the either party οn the Sunday following Good Friday.
The two parties also differed with regard tο the fasting preceding Easter. The Western churches viewed the birthday of Christ exclusively as a day of mourning, sad they did nut terminate the time of fasting until the day of resurrection. the churches of Asia Minor, at the other hand, looking upon the death of Christ wholly aa the redemption of mankind, terminated it at the hour of Christ's death (8 o'clock in the afternoon), and immedίately after celebrated the agaρe sad the Lord's Supper.
In addition to these two parties, both of which were within the old Catholic Church, there was another, repudiated by the Church. This third party, an Εbionίtiε sect, agreed with the churches of Asίa Μinor in adhering tο the commemoration of the day of the month (14th and 16th), but differed from them in insisting upon the continuance of the obligatory character of the ancient law, and the cconsequentduty of Christians tο celebrate the Jewish Passονer.
Βοth were called (Latin quartodecίwbυs) day tithe month on which they commemorated the death d Christ. Eusebius mentions (Sad. & des. ν, 23 ; Firs Cοφοίaιιd. id, 19) Palestine, Pontus, Gallia, Rome, Uaoene, Corinth, Phoenicia, Alexandria, as churches following the Western practice...... tο these the emperor Constantine, in a circular enjoining the observance of a decree of the Nicene Council on the subject, adds all Malay, Africa, Sρain, Britain, Greece.
Thus the West era practice apρears tο have largely prevailed. its adherents traced its οrigίn to the aρostles Peter and Paul, while the churches of Asia minor rested their differing practice upon the authority of the apostle John. Both parties adhered tο the name of Πσwλa, by which they understood sometimes the whole week commemorating the Passion, sometimes the especially festive days of this week.
In the course seder (it is not known when) the death day was distinguishes σχa στιυιρώσ ον, and the day with the adherents of the other practice. The first effort to come tο an agreement on the contrονersy made by bishop Pοlycarρ, of Smyrna, about the middle of the 2d century, when on a visit tο bishop Aanicet, of Rome the two bishops received each other with the kiss of peace, but neither of them was willing tο sacri­fice the practice of his predecessors.
Nevertheless they parted in kindness; and peace continued tο reign be­tween the two parties. a few years later, the Εbίοn­itish Quartalecimani caused great trouble at Laodicea (about 170), at Dome (about 180), where a certain Blas­tus was at their head, and in other places. Books against them were written by !Welke of Sardis and of Ηieraροlίs, both of whom were adhe­rents of the practice of Asia Minor ; by Clement of Alexandria and Ηίρροlytus (abοut the middle of the 3rd century).
Of all these books only fragments are left. That of Ηίρροlrtus shows that at this time the Jewish Quartοdecimani were regarded by the Church as here­tics. His first serious dispute between the parties with­in the old Catholic Church broke out about 196, when Bishop Victor, of Rome, issued a decider tο the leading bishops of the Church, requesting them tο hold synods in their provinces, and tο ίntrοduce the Western prac­tίce.
Some complied with this request; but they tried held Bishop Polperates, of Ephesus, emρhatically re­fused, and aρρrονed the letter of bishop Pοlycrates, who, in defense of the Asiatic practice, referred Pietοr tο the authority of the apostles Philip and John, tο Pοlycarρ, and tο seven of his relations, who before him had been bishops of Ephesus.
Victοr at first intended tο excommunicate the Asiatic churches, and therefore issued an encyclical tο the Christian of those regions, but whether he really carried out his threat is not cer­tain ; the words of Eusebius (Gist. Ecclesiastes.astes. ν, 24) on the mονeofnts of Victor are by some understood as implying a real execution of the excommunicatiοn, while the more common opinion is, that, in consequence of the indignant remonstrances against such a upsurρtiοn of power by the Western bishops, esρecίally by Irenei­us, the threat was never executed.
Thus far the contrονesey between the asiatic and the Westernc churches had only cοncerned twο ροints, namely, (1) whether the dap of the week οr the day of the month on which the death of Christ occurred should be cοmmemorated; (2) when the fasting οnght tο be terminated. Now a third point of dispute arose, as tο the time wben the 14th day of Νisaπ really occurred.
Μany of the Church fathers are of opinion that, according tο the original calculation of the Jews up tο the time of the destruction of Jerusalem, the 14th of Νίsen had always been after the sρrίng equines, and that it was only in εοnsequence of a miscal­culation of the later Jews that the 14th of Νisan οcca­siοnally fell befοre the equines.
They therefore insisted that the 14th of Νisan, whίch fοr both ρaτties within the Church determined the time of Easter, should always be after the equinox. as the rear of the Jews is a Ιuaaτ year, and the 14th of Νisan alwar a a full moon day, the Christians who adopted the above astτοηοmical view, whenever the 14th of Νisan fell before the equinox, would celebrate the death of Christ one month later than the Jewish Passover. as thο Christians could now nο longer rely οn the Jewish cal­endar, they had tο make their οwn calculations of the time of Easter.
These calculations frequently differ­ed, partly from reasons already set forth, and partly because the date of the equines was fixed by some at the 18th of Μarch, by others at the 19th, by others at the 21st of Μarch. The Council of arles in 814 endeavored tο establish uniformity, but its decrees do not appear tο have had greet effect.
The subject was therefore again discussed and acted upon by the Ecumenical Council of Nice, which decreed that Εaster as being distinguished in astronomical science, should annually inform the Church οf Rοme on what day οf the calends or ides Εaster should be celebrated, and the Church οf Rοme should notify all the churches of the world. Βut even these decrees of the Council of Nice did not ρut a stορ tο all differences, and it was reserved tο the calculation οf Diοnysius Εxignus (q. ν.) tο gradually introduce uniformity of practice into the whole Church.
Sοme countries, like Great Briton, did not abandon their ancient practice until after a long resistance. At the time οf Charleτπag4ne mifurmity seems tο have been established, and no trace is tο be found οf the Quartοdecimani. The revision οf the calendar by Pope Gregory X I I I, on the whole, retained the Diοnvsian sera, but determined mοre accurately the Easter full moon, and made careful prονision far avoiding any future deviation οf the calendar from the astronomical time.
Βy these minute calculations, hοweνer, the Christian Easter sometimes, cοntrary tο the decrees οf the Nicene Council. cοincides with the Jewish Passover. This, fοr instance, was the case in 1825.Mοsheim, Church Dist. i, 68 ;Neander, Church Ηist. i, 298 ; ii, 301, 302 ; Mïsheim, emirs. i, 523; Weitzel, Dee christliche Πaschu, feser der ersten Juhrhunderte (1848); Rettberg, in Zeitschrτ, f1, fir historische ' , 1832, vol. ii ; Hefele, in Wetzer a. Welte, Κτrεhen Lez. iii, 871; Steitz, in Herzog, lead Εneυklορ. xi, 140; Steitz, Die D f ferenz der Οccidentalen u, der Κlei (in Stud. u. Êrit.1856). (A. J. S.)
so Latinized by the Vulgate paschal), i. e. Passover Easter is a word of Saxon origin, and imports a goddess of the Saxons, or, rather, of the East, Εstera, in honor of whom sacrifices being annually offered about the Passover time of the year (spring), the name became attached by association of ideas tο the Christian festival "of the resurrection, which happened at the time of the Passover:
hence we say Easterday, Easter Sunday, but very improperly ; as we by no means refer the festival then kept tο the goddess of the ancient Saxons. SO the present German word for Easter, Os tern, is referred tο the same goddess, Est era Carnet, s. ν. The occurrence of this word in the a. V. of Acts xii, 4" Intending after Easter tο bring him forth tο the ρeορle is chiefly nοtieeable as an examρle of the want οf consistency in the translators.
In the earlier English version so Easter had been frequently used as the translation of πάσχ x. at the last revision Passover was substituted in all passages but this. I t would seem from this, and from the use of such words as " robbers of churches" (Acts xi x, 37),), " town clerk" (xix, 35), " sergeant¢" (xvi, 35), " deputy" (xiii, r, etc.), as if the Acts of the Apostles had &lien into the hands of a translator who acted on the principle οf choosing, not the most. correct, but the most familiar equivalents (comp. Trench, Q the Authοrizεd Version of the N. Τ. e. 21).Smith, s, v. Acts xii, 4.
EASΤER, CELEBRAΤIOΝ or. In the ancient Church the seventh day of Passion weep (q. v.), the greet Sabbath, as it was called, was observed with rigorous ρre + debated by night ; and the vigils continued eded till ceά<mwing, the hoar at which it is suppoour Lord rem. at this hoar the stillness of these midnight vigils was broken by the joyful acclamation to the"Τhe Lord is risen! The Lord is risen!
The Lord is risen indeed " the day of Εaster was celebrated with eνer demonstration of joy as a second jubilee. There was a solemn celebration of the Lord's Supper; the baptism of catechisms; appropriate salutations, and demonstrations of joy ; the liberation of prisoners, end the mannerism of slaves. Charίtίes were disposed tο the needy. Cents of justice were closed.
The heathen were forbidden tο celebrate public sρecticales in ceder that the devotions of Christians might not be interrupted. The week following was considered as a continuatiοn of the festival. During this time, those who had been baρtised at Easter continued waived in white, in token of that purity of life tο which they were bound by baptism.
On the Sunday follοwing they laid aside their garments of white, and were welcomed as members of the Church.Βingham, prey. tcεls. bk. x:a, ch. ν.
ΕASΤΕR there was much contention in the early Church as tο the days οn whίch our Lord's resurrection ought to be celebrated. Churches of Μonks celebrated the death of the Lord on the day corresponding tο the 14th of the month Νisan, οn which day, according to the opίnίon the whole ancient Church, the crucifixiοn took place.
The Western churches, on the other hand, were of opinion that the crucifixion should be annually commemorated on the particular day of the week on which it occured, that is, Friday. The resurrection was agreeably commemorated by the former ρarty on the day corresροnding tο the 16th of Νisan, and by the either party οn the Sunday following Good Friday.
The two parties also differed with regard tο the fasting preceding Easter. The Western churches viewed the birthday of Christ exclusively as a day of mourning, sad they did nut terminate the time of fasting until the day of resurrection. the churches of Asia Minor, at the other hand, looking upon the death of Christ wholly aa the redemption of mankind, terminated it at the hour of Christ's death (8 o'clock in the afternoon), and immedίately after celebrated the agaρe sad the Lord's Supper.
In addition to these two parties, both of which were within the old Catholic Church, there was another, repudiated by the Church. This third party, an Εbionίtiε sect, agreed with the churches of Asίa Μinor in adhering tο the commemoration of the day of the month (14th and 16th), but differed from them in insisting upon the continuance of the obligatory character of the ancient law, and the cconsequentduty of Christians tο celebrate the Jewish Passονer.
Βοth were called (Latin quartodecίwbυs) day tithe month on which they commemorated the death d Christ. Eusebius mentions (Sad. & des. ν, 23 ; Firs Cοφοίaιιd. id, 19) Palestine, Pontus, Gallia, Rome, Uaoene, Corinth, Phoenicia, Alexandria, as churches following the Western practice...... tο these the emperor Constantine, in a circular enjoining the observance of a decree of the Nicene Council on the subject, adds all Malay, Africa, Sρain, Britain, Greece.
Thus the West era practice apρears tο have largely prevailed. its adherents traced its οrigίn to the aρostles Peter and Paul, while the churches of Asia minor rested their differing practice upon the authority of the apostle John. Both parties adhered tο the name of Πσwλa, by which they understood sometimes the whole week commemorating the Passion, sometimes the especially festive days of this week.
In the course seder (it is not known when) the death day was distinguishes σχa στιυιρώσ ον, and the day with the adherents of the other practice. The first effort to come tο an agreement on the contrονersy made by bishop Pοlycarρ, of Smyrna, about the middle of the 2d century, when on a visit tο bishop Aanicet, of Rome the two bishops received each other with the kiss of peace, but neither of them was willing tο sacri­fice the practice of his predecessors.
Nevertheless they parted in kindness; and peace continued tο reign be­tween the two parties. a few years later, the Εbίοn­itish Quartalecimani caused great trouble at Laodicea (about 170), at Dome (about 180), where a certain Blas­tus was at their head, and in other places. Books against them were written by !Welke of Sardis and of Ηieraροlίs, both of whom were adhe­rents of the practice of Asia Minor ; by Clement of Alexandria and Ηίρροlytus (abοut the middle of the 3rd century).
Of all these books only fragments are left. That of Ηίρροlrtus shows that at this time the Jewish Quartοdecimani were regarded by the Church as here­tics. His first serious dispute between the parties with­in the old Catholic Church broke out about 196, when Bishop Victor, of Rome, issued a decider tο the leading bishops of the Church, requesting them tο hold synods in their provinces, and tο ίntrοduce the Western prac­tίce.
Some complied with this request; but they tried held Bishop Polperates, of Ephesus, emρhatically re­fused, and aρρrονed the letter of bishop Pοlycrates, who, in defense of the Asiatic practice, referred Pietοr tο the authority of the apostles Philip and John, tο Pοlycarρ, and tο seven of his relations, who before him had been bishops of Ephesus.
Victοr at first intended tο excommunicate the Asiatic churches, and therefore issued an encyclical tο the Christian of those regions, but whether he really carried out his threat is not cer­tain ; the words of Eusebius (Gist. Ecclesiastes.astes. ν, 24) on the mονeofnts of Victor are by some understood as implying a real execution of the excommunicatiοn, while the more common opinion is, that, in consequence of the indignant remonstrances against such a upsurρtiοn of power by the Western bishops, esρecίally by Irenei­us, the threat was never executed.
Thus far the contrονesey between the asiatic and the Westernc churches had only cοncerned twο ροints, namely, (1) whether the dap of the week οr the day of the month on which the death of Christ occurred should be cοmmemorated; (2) when the fasting οnght tο be terminated. Now a third point of dispute arose, as tο the time wben the 14th day of Νisaπ really occurred.
Μany of the Church fathers are of opinion that, according tο the original calculation of the Jews up tο the time of the destruction of Jerusalem, the 14th of Νίsen had always been after the sρrίng equines, and that it was only in εοnsequence of a miscal­culation of the later Jews that the 14th of Νisan οcca­siοnally fell befοre the equines.
They therefore insisted that the 14th of Νisan, whίch fοr both ρaτties within the Church determined the time of Easter, should always be after the equinox. as the rear of the Jews is a Ιuaaτ year, and the 14th of Νisan alwar a a full moon day, the Christians who adopted the above astτοηοmical view, whenever the 14th of Νisan fell before the equinox, would celebrate the death of Christ one month later than the Jewish Passover. as thο Christians could now nο longer rely οn the Jewish cal­endar, they had tο make their οwn calculations of the time of Easter.
These calculations frequently differ­ed, partly from reasons already set forth, and partly because the date of the equines was fixed by some at the 18th of Μarch, by others at the 19th, by others at the 21st of Μarch. The Council of arles in 814 endeavored tο establish uniformity, but its decrees do not appear tο have had greet effect.
The subject was therefore again discussed and acted upon by the Ecumenical Council of Nice, which decreed that Εaster as being distinguished in astronomical science, should annually inform the Church οf Rοme on what day οf the calends or ides Εaster should be celebrated, and the Church οf Rοme should notify all the churches of the world. Βut even these decrees of the Council of Nice did not ρut a stορ tο all differences, and it was reserved tο the calculation οf Diοnysius Εxignus (q. ν.) tο gradually introduce uniformity of practice into the whole Church.
Sοme countries, like Great Briton, did not abandon their ancient practice until after a long resistance. At the time οf Charleτπag4ne mifurmity seems tο have been established, and no trace is tο be found οf the Quartοdecimani. The revision οf the calendar by Pope Gregory X I I I, on the whole, retained the Diοnvsian sera, but determined mοre accurately the Easter full moon, and made careful prονision far avoiding any future deviation οf the calendar from the astronomical time.
Βy these minute calculations, hοweνer, the Christian Easter sometimes, cοntrary tο the decrees οf the Nicene Council. cοincides with the Jewish Passover. This, fοr instance, was the case in 1825.Mοsheim, Church Dist. i, 68 ;Neander, Church Ηist. i, 298 ; ii, 301, 302 ; Mïsheim, emirs. i, 523; Weitzel, Dee christliche Πaschu, feser der ersten Juhrhunderte (1848); Rettberg, in Zeitschrτ, f1, fir historische ' , 1832, vol. ii ; Hefele, in Wetzer a. Welte, Κτrεhen Lez. iii, 871; Steitz, in Herzog, lead Εneυklορ. xi, 140; Steitz, Die D f ferenz der Οccidentalen u, der Κlei (in Stud. u. Êrit.1856). (A. J. S.)
