Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Earth May Have Been A Waterworld
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jamesbond007" data-source="post: 74771903" data-attributes="member: 408340"><p>I was thinking it may be the same model (couldn't tell if it was from the same two scientists). The two may had to rework their model and get peer review buy-in in order to get published in nature. This is quite a claim and it would affect the evolution timeline assuming we go with the 3.2 billion year timeline they have. No life was supposed to exist back then, but the buried evidence shows different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jamesbond007, post: 74771903, member: 408340"] I was thinking it may be the same model (couldn't tell if it was from the same two scientists). The two may had to rework their model and get peer review buy-in in order to get published in nature. This is quite a claim and it would affect the evolution timeline assuming we go with the 3.2 billion year timeline they have. No life was supposed to exist back then, but the buried evidence shows different. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Earth May Have Been A Waterworld
Top
Bottom