Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Today at 10:24 PM mjiracek said this in Post #40
ok well there are other argumentments on the institute for creation research website. type in worldwide flood and they will have an abundance of articles that counter what you just presented
Today at 10:29 PM mjiracek said this in Post #43
also it said the fountains of the deep came forth and the waters of heaven came down. so there were two sources of water. not one or the other. also the amount of ground water in the world far surpasses that of surface water and if that came forth in one torretial period it would be plenty to cover the earth along with the help of heavey rains
Today at 10:41 PM mjiracek said this in Post #47
now there is a problem to both evolution and creation arguments. we were never there. so there fore we have to make assumptions off the same evidence. for example you say the grand canyon is old i say its young. we made an assumption off the vidence. however we have recorded canyon making which formed very quickly like mount st helens. so from that creationists assume that the grand canyon formed relativly quickly from the flood....i am not sure why i said that. it just popped in my head. sorry
Today at 10:44 PM mjiracek said this in Post #48
i think you are wrong there. th ogallala aquifer in central u.s. could cover our entire country in several feet of water. also we assume the world today is like it was back then which is stupid. even evolutionist belive the world has gone through great climactic changes so to say that this land was exposed or wasnt or this much water was needed only applies to earth today not back then
Today at 10:48 PM CoHehir said this in Post #50
That's a good point. Did all these mountains (Everest, K2, Kilimanjaro) exist before the flood? What if the world was relatively smooth as far as the land is concerned? What would it take to cover continents that only rose 100-400 feet above sea level?
Today at 10:56 PM mjiracek said this in Post #54
this is the mount saint helens website... http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4305news5-17-2000.asp
also no the earth is not the same as it was 4000 years ago. the mideats used to be much more vegetated especially the isreal region.
Today at 10:57 PM Arikay said this in Post #56
There is also no world evidence to show that the mountains were created suddenly. quite the contrary.
Besides, as was mentioned before, the amount of heat created in the large motions of the tectonic plates and volcanos, etc, would fry the world quite a few times over.