• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Don't Get It

trustgod

Regular Member
Jan 30, 2006
268
11
Port of Indecision
✟22,969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I guess you could label me as a "seeker" as I've spent the past several years trying to figure out God/religion/faith/Christianity. I've read a lot of apologetics books in my quest to understand all this. Since, by nature, I'm a very analytical person, facts speak to me much more than emotions and feelings, which has made it extremely difficult for me to come to a point where I can truly understand this whole faith thing.

Having said that, I think I've grasped the concept of God as the creator of the universe and life. There are actually many facts in our world that support the concept of God as the creator of life. My analytical nature is, for the most part, satisfied by these facts so I'm not a seeker from that perspective. The Deist sees God as a hands-off creator who, once He created the universe and life, really has nothing more to do with us. That would sum up my understanding of God right now.

However, when it comes to understanding the concept of God as a "personal God," who loves me, cares for me, and desires to have a relationship with me, I just don't get it. It doesn't make sense to me. There seems to be a huge wall that is preventing me from going any further into the "personal" realm -- that is, understanding God as a personal God.

Going to church is downright depressing. Walking into church with 1,000 people who do "get it" makes me feel inferior (I know many in church don't really get it, many are afraid to admit they don't get it), defective, and just plain old dumb. What do they know that I don't? is what I'm thinking. How could so many people be singing along with "Jesus is my boyfriend" as if He was physically present and listening, when I don't experience that. I always leave church more skeptical than I do when I enter.

I guess experiencing the emotional, personal side of God is either something I'm not wired to understand. I'm not much of a touchy-feely person, so when it comes to having to base a relationship with someone I can't see entirely on emotions and love, that just doesn't compute for me. Praying is a good example. I feel pretty strange praying, because to me it just feels like I'm talking to myself, which is really weird (to me) since it's directed toward someone else.

How does one, who might be called emotionally bankrupt, ever connect to a person (God) who is based purely on emotions (e.g., love)? I can convince myself until the cows come home that there is a creator, but trying to have a relationship with an invisible being is just too far out there for me to ever understand.
 

kevlite2020

rawr means I love you in dinosaur!
Sep 11, 2008
10,782
2,265
41
Florida
Visit site
✟43,200.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
How does one, who might be called emotionally bankrupt, ever connect to a person (God) who is based purely on emotions (e.g., love)? I can convince myself until the cows come home that there is a creator, but trying to have a relationship with an invisible being is just too far out there for me to ever understand.

Well the first key in this is to realize it is a relationship. Let me use an example. Let's say you meet a girl, and you've heard that she's really a sweet girl, and she's very pretty, and you've read all about her. In that first meeting, will you declare your undying love for her and seek marriage and children within the end of that day? I know it sounds rediculous, but that's not how relationships are supposed to work. Some people when they first believe in God, enter in that relationship right away and just get it. But for most people, it's a relationship that takes growth. Your relationship in God isn't any different then building a relationship with a real person. You need to be able to trust Him, care about the things He cares about, believe that He is truthful and concerned about you and that you should be the same to Him, And eventually, to love Him because of who He is, and because of how He loves you.

There's no timeline on this stuff and just because you aren't praising God with all you have at every moment doesn't mean you're a bad person or emotionally bankrupt. You just need some time to grow in this relationship.

So how do you grow? The best start would be to read the Bible. I know that sounds like a cookie cutter answer, but you won't be able to properly know and love God, if you don't know about God. I'd recommend starting with the gospels, especially the gospel of John. Learn about who Jesus is. His sacrifice and ressurection is amazing and the foundation of Christianity, but that isn't all that He is.

Also, it would help to get involved with people who do have a strong relationship with Jesus, to mentor you and guide you. That doesn't necessarily mean going to church. Maybe try and find a Bible study. Or try to befriend some Christians and just hang out with them, anywhere, doing any activity. If you put yourself around people who get it, they can guide you so much better then random strangers.

Good luck in your walk and I'll be praying for you bro!
 
Upvote 0

Van

Contributor
Oct 28, 2004
8,956
111
California
✟9,814.00
Faith
Christian
Hi Trustgod, you are right. The people who actually knew Jesus in the flesh had it way better than those who believe in the name of Jesus. To believe in the name means to believe what we have heard about Jesus, what Jesus is know for - virgin birth, life without sin, death on the cross, resurrection, and then ascension. And how can you, who does not believe God would send a Messiah to save believers, since He takes a hands off approach, believe in the name of Jesus? Tough row to hoe.
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
The only way that non-Christians can finally "get it" is by reading (or hearing) what God himself says in the Bible. For "faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God" (Romans 10:17). And when reading (or hearing) what God says in the Bible, people have to be very careful not to harden their hearts (or minds) against him: "While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts" (Hebrews 3:15).
 
Upvote 0

zaksmummy

Senior Member
Jul 6, 2007
2,198
196
Chesterfield
✟18,366.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
It is good to analyse, it means you make a reasoned decision about believing. But at some point faith has to take over and you have to accept that what God says is true.

You problem with the issue of emotion is that faith is not based upon emotion, when it is people are blown about every which way and struggle when things go wrong.

To me faith is based on trust. God says it, I trust it, how I feel about it is irrelevant.

Part of the other problem is with the word "love". In western culture love is a flimsy thing, here today gone tomorrow. Gods love is an everlasting expression of who he is, solid and dependable.

Try looking at the words the original language the bible was written in for a better understanding. Hebrew for the old testament and greek for the new testament. Gods solid love in greek is the word "agape"

Hope this helps you with your journey.
 
Upvote 0

trustgod

Regular Member
Jan 30, 2006
268
11
Port of Indecision
✟22,969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
And how can you, who does not believe God would send a Messiah to save believers, since He takes a hands off approach, believe in the name of Jesus? Tough row to hoe.
Not quite sure what you're getting at here. Tongue-in-cheek, or calling me out as intellectually dishonest?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

trustgod

Regular Member
Jan 30, 2006
268
11
Port of Indecision
✟22,969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Well the first key in this is to realize it is a relationship. Let me use an example. Let's say you meet a girl, and you've heard that she's really a sweet girl, and she's very pretty, and you've read all about her. In that first meeting, will you declare your undying love for her and seek marriage and children within the end of that day? I know it sounds rediculous, but that's not how relationships are supposed to work. Some people when they first believe in God, enter in that relationship right away and just get it. But for most people, it's a relationship that takes growth. Your relationship in God isn't any different then building a relationship with a real person. You need to be able to trust Him, care about the things He cares about, believe that He is truthful and concerned about you and that you should be the same to Him, And eventually, to love Him because of who He is, and because of how He loves you.

Good analogy, but there's one fatal flaw. That really sweet girl -- I can see her, hear her, etc. Through the use of my senses (eyes, ears, etc.) I can know without a shadow of a doubt that she exists and as such, can use that knowledge to form an understanding of her (what does she wear, how does she talk, etc.) and therefore make a decision on whether she is someone I actually do want a relationship with. Not so with God. What does he look like? What does his voice sound like? Do we know without a shadow of a doubt that he really actually does exist (i.e., do we have direct proof)? Because I seem to be in the majority of folks (at least here, anyways) that needs more evidence/proof than most, I can't use those data points to form an understanding of and base a relationship with him on.

I'm sure I'll hear all kinds of answers how there is no difference between the girl and God; that we can hear God; that we can see God; etc. But, you have to admit, there is a difference from seeing someone here, in person, and experiencing God. I just relate to the physical plane and anything not on it leaves me skeptical.



So how do you grow? The best start would be to read the Bible. I know that sounds like a cookie cutter answer, but you won't be able to properly know and love God, if you don't know about God. I'd recommend starting with the gospels, especially the gospel of John. Learn about who Jesus is. His sacrifice and ressurection is amazing and the foundation of Christianity, but that isn't all that He is.
No offense, but that is a cookie cutter answer. Actually, I have read the Bible. Here I am, still questioning things, though.

I honestly think there are some people who are predisposed to not being able to grasp things of a spiritual nature. Like myself, who is an overly (extreme?) analytical person, facts rule the day. And the fact is, nobody can without a shadow of a doubt prove the existence of God. Sure, there is a lot of evidence that might allow one to make a strong case for God's existence, but God cannot be proven (nor disproven, I realize that). So, like many others, I'm sure, it's difficult for me to "get it."

I admit it's a nice concept, and it does have some level of appeal for me, but making the leap from liking it in concept, to being a believer, just isn't happening.
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,352
Winnipeg
✟251,568.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Going to church is downright depressing. Walking into church with 1,000 people who do "get it" makes me feel inferior (I know many in church don't really get it, many are afraid to admit they don't get it), defective, and just plain old dumb. What do they know that I don't? is what I'm thinking. How could so many people be singing along with "Jesus is my boyfriend" as if He was physically present and listening, when I don't experience that. I always leave church more skeptical than I do when I enter.

Singing along with "Jesus is my boyfriend"? LOL! What kind of church are you attending?!

I guess experiencing the emotional, personal side of God is either something I'm not wired to understand. I'm not much of a touchy-feely person, so when it comes to having to base a relationship with someone I can't see entirely on emotions and love, that just doesn't compute for me.

Hmmm...Is there no one in your life who you love? If there is, maybe pondering the love you have for that person can enlighten you somewhat as to how to love God.

I don't see anywhere in Scripture where we are asked to walk with God "entirely on emotions." We are told, instead,"the just shall live by faith," and "without faith it impossible to please God," and that "he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him." Of course, no one normally puts their faith in someone they don't know. So, behind the biblical injunctions to have faith in God is the idea that we would know God intimately. Paul the apostle put it this way:

2 Timothy 1:12 (NKJV)
"...for I know whom I have believed and am persuaded that He is able to keep what I have committed to Him until that Day."


For Paul, there was a distinct progression from knowledge of God to fulling committing himself to God: Knowledge>belief>commitment. I don't think you can come to the place where you love God without going through this progression yourself.

How does one come to know God? The Bible tells us that it is in its pages that one finds God's primary revelation of Himself. As someone in this thread has already noted, "Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God." Ro. 10:17

Can you have faith in God without loving Him? Possibly. God makes it pretty clear, though, that our relationship with Him is to be motivated by love. He doesn't demand that we love Him in a vacuum, however. God isn't saying, "You gotta' love me!" without reason. Ideally, He intends that we would love Him as a result of coming to know Him and His love for us through study of His Word.

1 John 4:19 (NKJV)
"We love Him because He first loved us."


As one studies the Scriptures and reads of God's incredible efforts to reconcile wicked humanity to Himself, as one discovers how far God was willing to go to save us from ourselves, one begins to understand the massive depths of His love for all people. This understanding, in turn, ought to engender in oneself a love for God.

It is more than just understanding the lengths to which God went to save us from our sin that ought to cause us to love Him, however. Consider the following passage of Scripture:

Luke 7:36-47 (NKJV)
36 Then one of the Pharisees asked Him to eat with him. And He went to the Pharisee's house, and sat down to eat.
37 And behold, a woman in the city who was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at the table in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster flask of fragrant oil,
38 and stood at His feet behind Him weeping; and she began to wash His feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hair of her head; and she kissed His feet and anointed them with the fragrant oil.
39 Now when the Pharisee who had invited Him saw this, he spoke to himself, saying, "This man, if He were a prophet, would know who and what manner of woman this is who is touching Him, for she is a sinner."
40 And Jesus answered and said to him, "Simon, I have something to say to you." So he said, "Teacher, say it."
41 "There was a certain creditor who had two debtors. One owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty.
42 And when they had nothing with which to repay, he freely forgave them both. Tell Me, therefore, which of them will love him more?"
43 Simon answered and said, "I suppose the one whom he forgave more." And He said to him, "You have rightly judged."
44 Then He turned to the woman and said to Simon, "Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave Me no water for My feet, but she has washed My feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head.
45 You gave Me no kiss, but this woman has not ceased to kiss My feet since the time I came in.
46 You did not anoint My head with oil, but this woman has anointed My feet with fragrant oil.
47 Therefore I say to you, her sins, which are many, are forgiven, for she loved much. But to whom little is forgiven, the same loves little."


What was the difference between Simon the Pharisee and the weeping woman? The woman knew how desperately sinful she was while Simon was completely oblivious to the fact that he was equally, if not more, sinful. Simon, as a result of his blindness, of his pride, had no love for Christ. The woman's acknowledgement of her sin and her complete unworthiness of God's loving forgiveness, on the other hand, gave rise in her to an overpowering gratefulness and love for Jesus, her Saviour. You can see, then, that love for God is produced 1.) Through understanding His love for you in the sacrifice of His only Son, Jesus Christ. 2.) Acknowledging your sinfulness and utter unworthiness of such a sacrifice.

I think, when the full import of God's love strikes a person, tears are often the result. But this doesn't mean that one must go about loving God in some never-ending state of maudlin weepiness. In fact, God tells us that the prime way we show our love for Him isn't in raising our arms skyward, closing our eyes, and swaying back and forth as we sing about how "Jesus is our boyfriend," but in obeying God's commands. Love, in the godly sense of the word is evidenced toward God, first and foremost, in obedient action, not in mushy sentimentalism.

Praying is a good example. I feel pretty strange praying, because to me it just feels like I'm talking to myself, which is really weird (to me) since it's directed toward someone else.

The Bible says that when God's Spirit comes to dwell within a person, that person has an "inner witness" of their new, spiritual birth. That inner witness, that divine connection to God, gives you an awareness of Him that makes prayer vital and real. That you don't have this experience suggests that you have yet to be "born again." Until that happens, God will continue to seem at a distance to you.

How does one, who might be called emotionally bankrupt, ever connect to a person (God) who is based purely on emotions (e.g., love)? I can convince myself until the cows come home that there is a creator, but trying to have a relationship with an invisible being is just too far out there for me to ever understand.

God is not "based purely on emotion." Where in the Bible do you read that?

If you have determined that a relationship with God is beyond you, then it is not surprising that this is your experience. A relationship with God is only as impossible as you decide it is.

Peace.
 
Upvote 0

kevlite2020

rawr means I love you in dinosaur!
Sep 11, 2008
10,782
2,265
41
Florida
Visit site
✟43,200.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Good analogy, but there's one fatal flaw. That really sweet girl -- I can see her, hear her, etc. Through the use of my senses (eyes, ears, etc.) I can know without a shadow of a doubt that she exists and as such, can use that knowledge to form an understanding of her (what does she wear, how does she talk, etc.) and therefore make a decision on whether she is someone I actually do want a relationship with. Not so with God. What does he look like? What does his voice sound like? Do we know without a shadow of a doubt that he really actually does exist (i.e., do we have direct proof)? Because I seem to be in the majority of folks (at least here, anyways) that needs more evidence/proof than most, I can't use those data points to form an understanding of and base a relationship with him on.

I'm sure I'll hear all kinds of answers how there is no difference between the girl and God; that we can hear God; that we can see God; etc. But, you have to admit, there is a difference from seeing someone here, in person, and experiencing God. I just relate to the physical plane and anything not on it leaves me skeptical.

You're right, I would never argue those things. It is certainly easier to love something that you can physically see, hold, hear, all those things. I wasn't trying to convince you that God can be physically seen and all. I'm just trying to point out that the way to grow a relationship with God is the same as you would a person you can actually see. Learning as much as you can about them, communicating with them as much as you can, caring about and being interested in and loving the same things and people as He does, etc. Does that make sense? Sorry but just got off a long day at work and I am really hoping this doesn't turn into an unhelpful ramble :)

No offense, but that is a cookie cutter answer. Actually, I have read the Bible. Here I am, still questioning things, though.

I honestly think there are some people who are predisposed to not being able to grasp things of a spiritual nature. Like myself, who is an overly (extreme?) analytical person, facts rule the day. And the fact is, nobody can without a shadow of a doubt prove the existence of God. Sure, there is a lot of evidence that might allow one to make a strong case for God's existence, but God cannot be proven (nor disproven, I realize that). So, like many others, I'm sure, it's difficult for me to "get it."

I admit it's a nice concept, and it does have some level of appeal for me, but making the leap from liking it in concept, to being a believer, just isn't happening.

No offense taken :) It's a cookie cutter answer for a reason though, because for many people, it either works, or it at least helps quite a bit. I understand you are more analytical then the average bear so just reading about Him may not be enough to teach you how to love Him, even if you do believe in Him. What I'm about to tell you, I have a feeling that you won't believe that I'm being truthful, but I'll take that risk to try to explain my experience. I truly think God can be known by man absolutely, beyond a shadow of a doubt. The thing that makes it tricky is that you have to invite Him in and believe first. I remember getting baptized (at 24, I've only been a believer for a bit over a year). Before my baptism, I was pretty sure God was real, I had been praying, reading the Bible for awhile, getting in Bible study/fellowship groups, the whole nine yards. But I still was a little bit shaky. When I left from my baptism, there was no more doubt. From the experiences that happened just within me, I understood and knew that God was real. You could talk about the placebo effect all day, but I wasn't ever told what I would feel or suppose to feel, I wasn't under any pressure, the feelings that ran through me just came, and I knew it was God.

If you can humble yourself before God and have complete faith in Jesus, you will be reaffirmed by Him and you will know. The hard part is getting to that step, because it certainly does take a leap of faith.
 
Upvote 0

trustgod

Regular Member
Jan 30, 2006
268
11
Port of Indecision
✟22,969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Singing along with "Jesus is my boyfriend"? LOL! What kind of church are you attending?!

You know, the kind where they sing the current contemporary christian songs. The kind where the chorus is song over and over and over and over lol.

Hmmm...Is there no one in your life who you love? If there is, maybe pondering the love you have for that person can enlighten you somewhat as to how to love God.

Yes, indeed. But that person, again, is someone I can touch, see, hear, smell, etc. Apples and oranges.

I don't see anywhere in Scripture where we are asked to walk with God "entirely on emotions." We are told, instead,"the just shall live by faith," and "without faith it impossible to please God," and that "he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him." Of course, no one normally puts their faith in someone they don't know. So, behind the biblical injunctions to have faith in God is the idea that we would know God intimately.

Exactly. Getting over the hurdle from knowing God exists to knowing him intimately is the problem. I'm not sure I know anyone THAT intimately, not even myself lol. I didn't say we need to walk on emotions. I said that to me, having faith is an emotional pursuit. If it was an entirely cerebrial pursuit, I'd be at the head of the line in having faith. I lack emotion. That's just how I'm wired (by God?).

For Paul, there was a distinct progression from knowledge of God to fulling committing himself to God: Knowledge>belief>commitment. I don't think you can come to the place where you love God without going through this progression yourself.

What's the difference between knowledge and belief? Doesn't it take "faith" to make the leap between knowing and believing? The crux of this whole issue it seems...


How does one come to know God? The Bible tells us that it is in its pages that one finds God's primary revelation of Himself.
So, all I have to do is read the Bible and, poof, I'll have faith? I know that's not what you mean, but I hear that so often: just read the Bible and you'll figure it out. I have read the Bible, and I still haven't figured it out.


Can you have faith in God without loving Him? Possibly. God makes it pretty clear, though, that our relationship with Him is to be motivated by love. He doesn't demand that we love Him in a vacuum, however. God isn't saying, "You gotta' love me!" without reason. Ideally, He intends that we would love Him as a result of coming to know Him and His love for us through study of His Word.

As one studies the Scriptures and reads of God's incredible efforts to reconcile wicked humanity to Himself, as one discovers how far God was willing to go to save us from ourselves, one begins to understand the massive depths of His love for all people. This understanding, in turn, ought to engender in oneself a love for God.

Maybe I'm just dense. Maybe I'm just uncapable of "getting it," but when I hear people say things like that I have no reference point to relate it to, so it's just an abstract concept. It doesn't make sense that this invisible person has such a massive amount of love for me and as such, I owe him my unbridled love and faith in return? That's just out there, forgive me for saying so. Way off the common-sense scale. Again, it must be me because I seem to be in a minority.


I think, when the full import of God's love strikes a person, tears are often the result. But this doesn't mean that one must go about loving God in some never-ending state of maudlin weepiness. In fact, God tells us that the prime way we show our love for Him isn't in raising our arms skyward, closing our eyes, and swaying back and forth as we sing about how "Jesus is our boyfriend," but in obeying God's commands. Love, in the godly sense of the word is evidenced toward God, first and foremost, in obedient action, not in mushy sentimentalism.
So love, in regards to God, as obedient action?

Reading a book and deciding you love someone just seems off to me. No offense intended here, please understand that. Maybe it's just me -- like I said, I think I'm wired so that this type of thing can't make sense.

The Bible says that when God's Spirit comes to dwell within a person, that person has an "inner witness" of their new, spiritual birth. That inner witness, that divine connection to God, gives you an awareness of Him that makes prayer vital and real. That you don't have this experience suggests that you have yet to be "born again." Until that happens, God will continue to seem at a distance to you.

But I said the sinner's prayer. Once saved, always saved, right? Isn't that what "born again means?"

God is not "based purely on emotion." Where in the Bible do you read that?

I haven't read that. But, isn't "love" one of the main points of Christianity? Love God, love your neighbor, love yourself? Maybe it's my understanding of the word "love," but to me it connotates an emotional response. Looking up love in the dictionary and it's either a noun (the emotion) or a verb (to be in love). Therefore, equating God with love, doesn't it make sense that faith in God is more of an emotional response? Again, I could be wrong, and probably am, but take emotion out of love and it's something entirely different to me.

If you have determined that a relationship with God is beyond you, then it is not surprising that this is your experience. A relationship with God is only as impossible as you decide it is.

That's not a determination I've made, but one I'm afraid is inevitable. I just don't see how a relationship with God can exist (for me at least) without the emotional connection. I don't mean to harp on that so much, and maybe the relationships I have had haven't been real relationships, but they've all had that element.


I'm not trying to pick an argument here, but this is just an issue that constantly escapes the grasp of my comprehension. Yes, I can probably convince myself without too much of a struggle that there is a God, a creator figure. But the limits of my comprehension stop there. To convince myself that this person who has been around longer than the universe wants me to know him personally? How is that possible?

I should probably just stop right here and admit that I'm faith-challenged, and no matter how hard I try to "get it," it just isn't going to happen. I've been trying for a good 8+ years, and am really no closer now that I was on day 1. Maybe some day something will happen that enlightens me, but I feel like I'm just beating my head against the wall right now. No sense in wasting anybody's time on this forum anymore than I already have, too. I do appreciate your efforts, however.
 
Upvote 0

kevlite2020

rawr means I love you in dinosaur!
Sep 11, 2008
10,782
2,265
41
Florida
Visit site
✟43,200.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I should probably just stop right here and admit that I'm faith-challenged, and no matter how hard I try to "get it," it just isn't going to happen. I've been trying for a good 8+ years, and am really no closer now that I was on day 1. Maybe some day something will happen that enlightens me, but I feel like I'm just beating my head against the wall right now. No sense in wasting anybody's time on this forum anymore than I already have, too. I do appreciate your efforts, however.

You aren't wasting any of our time. I in fact am enjoying seeing your perspective and trying to step into your shoes. I want to thank you for posting, and for being so curious and so open. I hope we can find a way to help you and I hope you don't give up in your search for a relationship with Jesus. I mean, you've read the Bible, you understand how important belief or lack of belief in God is, because depending on that perspective, your whole world view, your views on eternity, all of that is dependant on it. I just don't want to see you walk away because it's hard, or it doesn't come natural. I want you to get to the bottom of this issue and really figure it out, and I want to do anything I can to help. So please, keep asking questions, keep seeking, don't lose hope!
progress.gif
 
Upvote 0
F

freeport

Guest
I guess you could label me as a "seeker" as I've spent the past several years trying to figure out God/religion/faith/Christianity. I've read a lot of apologetics books in my quest to understand all this. Since, by nature, I'm a very analytical person, facts speak to me much more than emotions and feelings, which has made it extremely difficult for me to come to a point where I can truly understand this whole faith thing.

Having said that, I think I've grasped the concept of God as the creator of the universe and life. There are actually many facts in our world that support the concept of God as the creator of life. My analytical nature is, for the most part, satisfied by these facts so I'm not a seeker from that perspective. The Deist sees God as a hands-off creator who, once He created the universe and life, really has nothing more to do with us. That would sum up my understanding of God right now.

However, when it comes to understanding the concept of God as a "personal God," who loves me, cares for me, and desires to have a relationship with me, I just don't get it. It doesn't make sense to me. There seems to be a huge wall that is preventing me from going any further into the "personal" realm -- that is, understanding God as a personal God.

Going to church is downright depressing. Walking into church with 1,000 people who do "get it" makes me feel inferior (I know many in church don't really get it, many are afraid to admit they don't get it), defective, and just plain old dumb. What do they know that I don't? is what I'm thinking. How could so many people be singing along with "Jesus is my boyfriend" as if He was physically present and listening, when I don't experience that. I always leave church more skeptical than I do when I enter.

I guess experiencing the emotional, personal side of God is either something I'm not wired to understand. I'm not much of a touchy-feely person, so when it comes to having to base a relationship with someone I can't see entirely on emotions and love, that just doesn't compute for me. Praying is a good example. I feel pretty strange praying, because to me it just feels like I'm talking to myself, which is really weird (to me) since it's directed toward someone else.

How does one, who might be called emotionally bankrupt, ever connect to a person (God) who is based purely on emotions (e.g., love)? I can convince myself until the cows come home that there is a creator, but trying to have a relationship with an invisible being is just too far out there for me to ever understand.

God has nothing to do with church, and everything to do with all of history and creation.
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,352
Winnipeg
✟251,568.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
You know, the kind where they sing the current contemporary christian songs. The kind where the chorus is song over and over and over and over lol.

Oh, yes, I know that kind of "worship." Makes me think of the Scripture's command to "avoid vain repetition." I've often wondered what the point is of singing the same few words half a dozen times or more. I'm pretty sure God heard me the first time. I suspect the idea is to work people up into an emotional lather by chanting.

Yes, indeed. But that person, again, is someone I can touch, see, hear, smell, etc. Apples and oranges.

Oh, I see. So, the issue for you isn't being able to love, but being able to physically perceive God. You have to be able to reach out and touch Him before you will love Him.

Why have you set this limit on yourself? It sounds like you believe you "just can't help it," but is that really true? There are and have been literally millions of people over the centuries who have had an experience of God. Some of them were just as you are: skeptical, analytical, and determined not to know God except they could lay their hands on Him first. Even some prominent atheists have conceded that there is more to life than simply what can be perceived by the senses. For example, Jean-Paul Sartre shortly before his death said,

"I do not feel that I'm the product of chance, a speck of dust in the universe, but rather someone who is expected, prepared, prefigured, in short, a being whom only a creator God could have put here."

Bertrand Russell, a very well-known atheist, wrote the following in a letter:

"Even when one feels nearest to other people, something in one needs obstinately to belong to God and refuse to enter into any earthly communion - at least that is how I should express it if I thought there was a God. It is odd, isn't it? I feel passionately for this world and many things and people in it and yet...what is it all? There must be something more important, one feels, though I don't believe there is. I am haunted."

The formerly notorious atheist, Antony Flew, has also recently become a believer in God (though not exactly the Christian one). None of these highly skeptical men could entirely eradicate the innate awareness all of us have of our Creator - even though they made careers and reputations in attempting to do so.

Exactly. Getting over the hurdle from knowing God exists to knowing him intimately is the problem. I'm not sure I know anyone THAT intimately, not even myself lol. I didn't say we need to walk on emotions. I said that to me, having faith is an emotional pursuit. If it was an entirely cerebrial pursuit, I'd be at the head of the line in having faith. I lack emotion. That's just how I'm wired (by God?).

Well, there is blind faith, which seems often to be accompanied by hyper-emotionalism. Normal faith, the faith all of us exercise on a daily basis, however, is typically more rational and rests on specific, trusted facts. Using public transit, or mailing a letter, or sending a package via UPS, or turning the key in the ignition of your car - all of these are relatively unemotional acts of faith prompted by trust in a particular set of facts. The same is true of the Christian's faith in God; it, too, rests upon a set of trustworthy facts. These facts may give rise to emotion, but that emotion should have no significant bearing upon one's faith. With or without an accompanying strong emotion, the facts upon which a Christian rests his faith are true.

You don't lack emotion. You've indicated that you love another. God hasn't made you an emotionless automaton; that's not how He "wired" you. You have chosen to have your emotions follow your intellect in regards to God and that is okay - to a point. When you choose to engage your emotions in response to what you know of God is your responsibility, not His.

What's the difference between knowledge and belief? Doesn't it take "faith" to make the leap between knowing and believing? The crux of this whole issue it seems...

What do you think? Does it take faith to make the leap between knowing and believing? How does one go from knowing a fact to trusting it enough to act on it (which, I think, is the litmus test for genuine belief)? Is it simply faith that makes this possible? Or is there something else in the mix?

So, all I have to do is read the Bible and, poof, I'll have faith? I know that's not what you mean, but I hear that so often: just read the Bible and you'll figure it out. I have read the Bible, and I still haven't figured it out.

I think Paul the apostle answers your question here pretty well:

Hebrews 11:6 (NKJV)
6 But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.


You can read the Bible till your eyes burst into flames and never come to any confidence in what you read. Part of what must happen is that God must convict you of the truth of what you are reading. If you are secretly determined not to be so convicted, however, God will not force the issue.

If you are sincerely expecting God to reveal Himself to you and you approach reading the Bible with this expectation, then it is that you may find the Word of God piercing you to the core of your being. But this is the problem, isn't it? Most of us don't naturally want God getting into the hidden corners, the coveted practices, the self-gratifying pursuits of our lives and changing them. We understand, mostly instinctively at first, that dealing with God will mean a profound life-shift that removes oneself from the throne of one's life and puts God there instead. He'll root around and throw out of our lives what doesn't suit Him and that isn't always a welcome prospect. So, we play mind games, games of rationalization, games of reason that justify keeping God at arm's length. I'm not saying this is necessarily true of you - but it could be.

Maybe I'm just dense. Maybe I'm just uncapable of "getting it," but when I hear people say things like that I have no reference point to relate it to, so it's just an abstract concept. It doesn't make sense that this invisible person has such a massive amount of love for me and as such, I owe him my unbridled love and faith in return? That's just out there, forgive me for saying so. Way off the common-sense scale. Again, it must be me because I seem to be in a minority.

I agree with you: It doesn't make sense that God has such a massive amount of love for us. After thirty-plus years of being God's child, I am still baffled by His love. This doesn't change the truth of it, however.

I guess to a stranger to the Christian experience looking in on it, it must seem very odd indeed. Certainly, if you are pretty sure God doesn't exist, then a Christian's talk of "being in love with God" must sound, as you say, "out there." Personally, I feel sort of the same about golf. Maybe I'm just dense. Maybe I'm just uncapable of "getting it," but when I hear people say things about their love of golf I have no reference point to relate it to, so it's just an abstract concept. It doesn't make sense that golf has such a massive amount of entertainment value for me and as such, I owe it to the sport to give it a try? That's just out there, forgive me for saying so. Way off the common-sense scale. Again, it must be me because I seem to be in a minority...;)

But I said the sinner's prayer. Once saved, always saved, right? Isn't that what "born again means?"

I'm not sure what "said the sinner's prayer" means. I've never encountered such a prayer in the Bible...I don't know what you thought you did to be saved, but, from what you've written it seems very clear to me that you aren't, in fact, saved. You aren't alone in this, mind you. I think there are probably more people in the Church who think they are saved and are not, than who actually are saved. Salvation isn't a matter of particular words that you say. It is an exchange: God's "new life in Christ" for your old life of Sin and Self. Salvation is in a person, Jesus Christ, not a ritual.

1 John 5:11-12 (NKJV)
11 And this is the testimony: that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.
12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.


I haven't read that. But, isn't "love" one of the main points of Christianity? Love God, love your neighbor, love yourself?

Almost right - except for that "love yourself" part. We do that quite naturally - and that's the problem!

Maybe it's my understanding of the word "love," but to me it connotates an emotional response. Looking up love in the dictionary and it's either a noun (the emotion) or a verb (to be in love). Therefore, equating God with love, doesn't it make sense that faith in God is more of an emotional response? Again, I could be wrong, and probably am, but take emotion out of love and it's something entirely different to me.

The Bible defines love primarily as self-sacrificing action, not emotion. This kind of love is exemplified in Christ's sacrificial death on the cross for mankind. It is the kind of love Paul the apostle defines in 1 Corinthians 13. This doesn't mean love isn't to some degree emotional - it is - just not mainly so.

I'm not trying to pick an argument here, but this is just an issue that constantly escapes the grasp of my comprehension. Yes, I can probably convince myself without too much of a struggle that there is a God, a creator figure. But the limits of my comprehension stop there. To convince myself that this person who has been around longer than the universe wants me to know him personally? How is that possible?

Friend, I honestly don't know. It is perhaps the greatest mystery of all. Why does God care about me? I have no idea except that He tells me He loves me. Why is that? Goodness knows! Certainly, I don't deserve His love! Rather than this putting me off a relationship with God, it, instead, deepens my love for Him. I think this what He intends His love for me should do (and you, too, I'm sure.)

Maybe some day something will happen that enlightens me, but I feel like I'm just beating my head against the wall right now. No sense in wasting anybody's time on this forum anymore than I already have, too. I do appreciate your efforts, however.

Hey, no problem. I'm glad to have been able to talk a bit with you about your God issues. May I recommend a helmet? For the head-against-the-wall thing?;)

Peace.
 
Upvote 0

Revived

Fighting the good fight of faith.
Mar 25, 2009
8,604
2,310
Planted by the water
Visit site
✟38,014.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I have a story for you trustgod...

During class one afternoon, a professor of philosophy – a non-believer -- begins to explain the core issue science has with the existence of God. To make his point, he asks the students if any of them believe in God. He then points to one of the students who has raised his hand and asks him to stand.

"So," the professor asks, "You believe in God?"

"Absolutely, sir."

"And what scientific rationale is your belief based on?"

The student looked at him and said, "None -- I just believe in God and the Bible based on faith."

"That is the problem that science has with God" the professor continued. "Science uses empirical, testable, and demonstrable protocols to prove or disprove the existence of things. God cannot be proved in this way, so therefore He cannot exist."

The professor turns again to the student and says, "We all have five senses that we use to identify and observe the world around us. "Tell me, son. Have you ever seen God?"

"No."

"Have you ever heard God?"

"No."

"Have you ever felt God? Tasted God? Smelled God? Have you ever had any sensory perception of God for that matter?"

"No sir, I'm afraid I haven't."

"Yet you still believe in God?"

"Yes."


"So, according to empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, we have just proven that God does not exist. What do you say to that, son?"

"Nothing. I have only my faith."

"Exactly. You have only your Faith. Son, that's not science and that is why religion is nothing more than a collection of unproven doctrines."

"Sir, can I pose a question?"

"Certainly"

"Is there such a thing as heat?"

"Yes"

"And is there such a thing as cold?"

"Yes"

"No sir, there isn't. You can have an abundance of heat. Even more heat. Super heat. White heat. A very small amount of heat or no heat. Suppose the temperature plummeted to 458 degrees below zero, which is the equivalent to the absence of heat. If the temperature plummeted even further, would there be any less heat?"

The professor paused. "No, there would not."


Thus, there is no tangible evidence or proof of cold because it cannot be accurately measured. Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat."


"So what is your point, young man?"

"My point is this. You correctly state that science is the study of observed phenomena yet based on your definition, science is a premise which is flawed just like religion."

"Flawed?" The professor exclaimed. "How is science flawed?"

"Sir, you are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can successfully measure. Science, however, cannot even explain a thought. It can be tested and studied using particles, algorithms, electricity, magnetism, etc. but a thought has never been seen, much less fully understood. Yet we all know that thoughts are real and that they exist. Thus, the absence of something observable doesn't mean it does not exist."

The student turned to the class.

"Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the Professor's brain? Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor's brain? Felt it, touched or smelled it?"

Laughter erupted in the classroom as the student turned to the professor:

"No one appears to have done so, professor. Therefore, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science concludes that your brain is indeed absent. With all due respect, then, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"

The room became silent as the professor began to stare at the student:

"I guess you'll have to take that on faith, son."

"That, sir, was my point. Faith. Believing in that which you cannot see or hear or feel or touch or smell -- does not make the object of your faith any less real than anything else."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

trustgod

Regular Member
Jan 30, 2006
268
11
Port of Indecision
✟22,969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I have a story for you trustgod...

During class one afternoon, a professor of philosophy – a non-believer -- begins to explain the core issue science has with the existence of God. To make his point, he asks the students if any of them believe in God. He then points to one of the students who has raised his hand and asks him to stand.

"So," the professor asks, "You believe in God?"

"Absolutely, sir."

"And what scientific rationale is your belief based on?"

The student looked at him and said, "None -- I just believe in God and the Bible based on faith."

"That is the problem that science has with God" the professor continued. "Science uses empirical, testable, and demonstrable protocols to prove or disprove the existence of things. God cannot be proved in this way, so therefore He cannot exist."

The professor turns again to the student and says, "We all have five senses that we use to identify and observe the world around us. "Tell me, son. Have you ever seen God?"

"No."

"Have you ever heard God?"

"No."

"Have you ever felt God? Tasted God? Smelled God? Have you ever had any sensory perception of God for that matter?"

"No sir, I'm afraid I haven't."

"Yet you still believe in God?"

"Yes."


"So, according to empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, we have just proven that God does not exist. What do you say to that, son?"

"Nothing. I have only my faith."

"Exactly. You have only your Faith. Son, that's not science and that is why religion is nothing more than a collection of unproven doctrines."

"Sir, can I pose a question?"

"Certainly"

"Is there such a thing as heat?"

"Yes"

"And is there such a thing as cold?"

"Yes"

"No sir, there isn't. You can have an abundance of heat. Even more heat. Super heat. White heat. A very small amount of heat or no heat. Suppose the temperature plummeted to 458 degrees below zero, which is the equivalent to the absence of heat. If the temperature plummeted even further, would there be any less heat?"

The professor paused. "No, there would not."


Thus, there is no tangible evidence or proof of cold because it cannot be accurately measured. Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat."


"So what is your point, young man?"

"My point is this. You correctly state that science is the study of observed phenomena yet based on your definition, science is a premise which is flawed just like religion."

"Flawed?" The professor exclaimed. "How is science flawed?"

"Sir, you are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can successfully measure. Science, however, cannot even explain a thought. It can be tested and studied using particles, algorithms, electricity, magnetism, etc. but a thought has never been seen, much less fully understood. Yet we all know that thoughts are real and that they exist. Thus, the absence of something observable doesn't mean it does not exist."

The student turned to the class.

"Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the Professor's brain? Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor's brain? Felt it, touched or smelled it?"

Laughter erupted in the classroom as the student turned to the professor:

"No one appears to have done so, professor. Therefore, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science concludes that your brain is indeed absent. With all due respect, then, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"

The room became silent as the professor began to stare at the student:

"I guess you'll have to take that on faith, son."

"That, sir, was my point. Faith. Believing in that which you cannot see or hear or feel or touch or smell -- does not make the object of your faith any less real than anything else."

Nice story. I already pretty much agree that God exists. It's just making the jump from believing God exists to having faith in God and the whole personal relationship thing that I don't get.
 
Upvote 0

Revived

Fighting the good fight of faith.
Mar 25, 2009
8,604
2,310
Planted by the water
Visit site
✟38,014.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Correct me if I'm off base but it sounds to me that the issue isn't the whole personal relationship with God...it's the enemy. A relationship with God is based on a reciprocal flow of love and blessings. The enemy, however, wants nothing more than to take your blessings. And he knows that by suppressing your faith, he has taken your blessings.

It seems we both agree that the bible is not difficult to understand. Living it is the key. If you also agree that the issue may indeed be with the enemy, then you need to remain steadfast in your convictions, your love for Jesus and the truth of His Word. To give your entire life and not certain aspects.

The Kingdom of God is founded on revelations, truths, acceptance, openness and sincerity. Alternatively, there is the kingdom of evil that is no less absolute in its falseness and its betrayal. The question is whether or not you are equally as steadfast to insure that the issues of Christian living and Christian duty are clearly discerned.

To truly take a stand and LIVE your beliefs, you cannot conform to both the truths of God and to wavering principles. A Christian life is a transformed life, not a conformed life.

Prayerfully,
Derrick
 
Upvote 0