don't exterminate all the jews in the world.

[Blessedj01]

Nice to know you think that!
tulc(doesn't like to interrupt someone who is so obviously feeling like they're being extremely righteous!)

What part of it don't you understand? What kind of logic do you have to support "death to the Jews" as opposed to "support Israel". Where do you get off? You think you're being really clever, but you're just jumping to extremes. Plus they say speaking in the third person implies you think highly of yourself.

 

[TerranceL]

What part of it don't you understand? What kind of logic do you have to support "death to the Jews" as opposed to "support Israel". Where do you get off? You think you're being really clever, but you're just jumping to extremes.

Where did he say he support one over the other? He said get rid of both statements.

 

[tulc]

What part of it don't you understand? What kind of logic do you have to support "death to the Jews" as opposed to "support Israel".

Ahhh! I think I see the problem now! You've missed the whole point of my post! Don't feel bad it often happens when we get involved in an online discussion where there's nothing but the words on the page, no inflections, no body language and no subtle clues to "read" and understand the shadings of what's being said. If you read my post again you'll see no where in it did I even hint I supported exterminating the Jews. (go ahead re-read it again, I'll wait ) all done? if so I think what you'll find is I was against censoring others not exterminating them, hence my juxtaposing "Exterminate all Jews!" with forbidding others from saying "Support Israel now!". See the difference? One supports the crime of genocide (that's one that I didn't support) and one's about not forbidding others from expressing their opinion that's the one I supported.

Where do you get off?

When I'm riding the train? I get off at the train station in downtown Chicago, when I fly it's usually at O'Hare sometimes I fly into Midway also. Why do you ask?

You think you're being really clever,

Not really, otherwise you'd have understood my point right away.

but you're just jumping to extremes.

Well...if we're being honest I didn't jump to anything but you sort of jumped to a conclusion and ran with it.

Plus they say speaking in the third person implies you think highly of yourself.

...and they'd be wrong about that. Tell you what, if it bothers you there's a simple solution: I only post like that after I've signed my post so in the future if you simply stop reading when you see the word "tulc" and ignore what's in between the parentheses it shouldn't be a bother.
tulc(some of you should have stopped reading back there, right after the c)

 

[GoldenBoy89]

...and they'd be wrong about that. Tell you what, if it bothers you there's a simple solution: I only post like that after I've signed my post so in the future if you simply stop reading when you see the word "tulc" and ignore what's in between the parentheses it shouldn't be a bother.
tulc(some of you should have stopped reading back there, right after the c)

I for one, always enjoy your signature, witty afterthoughts.

 

[Blessedj01]

I'd be all for banning "exterminate all the jews in the world now." if they also banned "support Israel now!" or "Israel has a right to exist now!". tulc(likes to keep things fair if possible)

Tulc I don't have time to respond to your novel but as you can see you compared apples to oranges. You said it should be ok to say "exterminate all Jews.." as long as no one says "support Israel", or " Israel has a right to exist ".... Your silly point, if I can call it that, is that no one should say they support Israel or that they have a 'right' to exist, as long as people can't say they want to kill all the Jews. Your point is ridiculous and so is your lengthy attempt at hiding that.

Oh and lose the haughty tone you haven't won anything yet. You're patting yourself on the back.

 

[Blessedj01]

And just stop being silly no one is actually censoring anything.

 

[pgp_protector]

Ok, was it just me, or did anyone else read that in a Dalek voice ?

 

[classicalhero]

Because people have the right of free speech, to say what they wish, even if it's something you don't like to hear.

It is called incitement to violence and that is a crime.

 

[TerranceL]

Ok, was it just me, or did anyone else read that in a Dalek voice ?

Tags 1 and 2 are mine. So no.. you weren't the only one!

 

[MasterRich]

people calling for death to Israel on Facebook


Facebook says calling for death to Israel isn't hate speech because it's a country | WashingtonExaminer.com

Don't worry Gattaca and do not fear, God will protect his people! When enemies surround you his going to be in your corner!

Remember this is the DEVIL'S DOING!

 

[Autumnleaf]

Well Gattaca, I hadn't thought of it but since you mentioned it...

Am I the only one who suspect Gattaca is a troll? If I didn't know better I'd think she was trying to put ideas out there.

 

[florida2]

Tulc I don't have time to respond to your novel but as you can see you compared apples to oranges. You said it should be ok to say "exterminate all Jews.." as long as no one says "support Israel", or " Israel has a right to exist ".... Your silly point, if I can call it that, is that no one should say they support Israel or that they have a 'right' to exist, as long as people can't say they want to kill all the Jews. Your point is ridiculous and so is your lengthy attempt at hiding that.

Oh and lose the haughty tone you haven't won anything yet. You're patting yourself on the back.

Oh come on. Tulc is standing up for free speech. He is not being antisemetic or, indeed, anti Palestine.

Maybe if tulc had directly compared 'exterminate all Jews' to 'death to all Arabs' you wouldn't have a problem?

 

[tulc]

Tulc I don't have time to respond to your novel

So...you have time to post something in response to my post but not to actually address anything I said in the post?

but as you can see you compared apples to oranges.

uhmmm actually you're the one who said that and I didn't compare apples to oranges I compared two people expressing an opinion. (which you would have known had you read my "novel".)

You said it should be ok to say "exterminate all Jews.." as long as no one says "support Israel", or " Israel has a right to exist "

I see you are still responding to what you THINK I said and not to what I actually said

.... Your silly point, if I can call it that, is that no one should say they support Israel or that they have a 'right' to exist, as long as people can't say they want to kill all the Jews. Your point is ridiculous and so is your lengthy attempt at hiding that.

Its kind of cute how you do that, miss my point while pretending to "explain" it.

Oh and lose the haughty tone you haven't won anything yet. You're patting yourself on the back.

You do know you can't hear "tone" in a print form of communication, right? so if you're "hearing a haughty tone"? that would be because you're supplying it not me.
tulc(hasn't had this much fun on CF in quite some time!)

 

[Blessedj01]

So...you have time to post something in response to my post but not to actually address anything I said in the post? uhmmm actually you're the one who said that and I didn't compare apples to oranges I compared two people expressing an opinion. (which you would have known had you read my "novel".) Isee you are still responding to what you THINK I said and not to what I actually said Its kind of cute how you do that, miss my point while pretending to "explain" it. You do know you can't hear "tone" in a print form of communication, right? so if you're "hearing a haughty tone"? that would be because you're supplying it not me. tulc(hasn't had this much fun on CF in quite some time!)

All i can be bothered replying to is that you think language carries no tone. It does.

 

[tulc]

All i can be bothered replying to is that you think language carries no tone. It does.

I see you missed a key word in my response.
tulc(understands we sometimes post in haste, but try reading it again and see which word you missed here's a hint: it's between the words "a" and "form")

 

[Blessedj01]

I see you missed a key word in my response. tulc(understands we sometimes post in haste, but try reading it again and see which word you missed here's a hint: it's between the words "a" and "form")

All you can do is keep coming back with these cynical and lame replies where you pretend to be superior and intelligent. I hate to break it to you but no one is impressed.

 

[Blessedj01]

Fact: you said it should be ok to say. "Kill all the Jews" (approx) as long as it's ok to say. " support Israel"

That's comparing apples with oranges. Simple point, why don't you get it?

Im using an ipod I can't and don't need to write a dissertation to show that you're wrong.

 

[elephunky]

Those kind of statements are really a knee jerk reaction. Like when a kid gets mauled by a dog and some people say "kill em all".

 

[TerranceL]

All you can do is keep coming back with these cynical and lame replies where you pretend to be superior and intelligent. I hate to break it to you but no one is impressed.

At least he gives a reply you appear to not be bothered to reply to anything anyone has said.

 

[tulc]

All you can do is keep coming back with these cynical and lame replies where you pretend to be superior and intelligent. I hate to break it to you but no one is impressed.

hmmmm...so instead of addressing what I say you spend your time attacking me. That would seem to indicate you can't actually refute my point (not the one you claim I'm making, my actual point) that censoring what people say is wrong.
tulc(also noticed you don't seem to have figured out the word you missed in my post)