• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does this verse disprove Sola Scriptura?

Status
Not open for further replies.

II Paradox II

Oracle of the Obvious
Oct 22, 2003
527
32
51
California
Visit site
✟860.00
Faith
Calvinist
The only issue there is that all of them are just posting the opinions of scholars who they like, men who are usually only giving educated guesses about when things were written, the same as the liner notes in your bible. There simply isn't that much hard evidence about this period so we really don't know exactly when theings were written, it's largely educated speculation.

ken
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,049
1,801
60
New England
✟616,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Carlos Vigil said:
(1) No, I do not believe the Didache writers are led away from the Faith, rather, SOME writers and teachers of THIS AGE are led away. The Didache teachers were refering to THE SECOND COMING of CHRIST, not the rupture.



Good Day, Carlos


"And then shall appear the signs of the truth: first, the sign of an outspreading in heaven, then the sign of the sound of the trumpet. And third, the resurrection of the dead -- yet not of all, but as it is said: 'The Lord shall come and all His saints with Him.' Then shall the world see the Lord coming upon the clouds of heaven." (16)

You may whant to rethink your position here.


Have we not done this with in the topic of John 4, Jesus does not condem the worship of the father of the woman as not being worship. Was not the worship in the mountians based upon some form "of"?

Very troubling that you see the blessings of God as some thing to be worked for. You still do not see the bigger picture here. Pure worship, is worship based upon it's nature, and to the form. Was the fact David danced naked be fore the Lord the only reason his worship was true. It this a form of worship that you employ?



Change of the preist hood, Where juses is the high preist in the order of Malkesidik [sp] a order that is eternal. He for fullied the 1 st not took it away. Veil= flesh interesting take on the temple veil that was rent in 2.

You can not offer his flesh:

Augustine: You are deprived the flesh of the Lord, because he is not flesh as to be with you but is risen to the right hand of the father. Though he be with us in a sence as to say Lo, I am with you allways.

John : tractates #50,. 4 and 50

I have paraphased this as I am not with all my resources, But I think you get the point.

All sacrifices to God must be pure with out spot, I do not see one as more pure than the other Pure is Pure.

Unless you are talking about soap!

Peace to u,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
ChiRho said:
Doesn't God DEMAND obedience?

I prefer to think of God as Jesus describes Himself; "I AM GENTLE AND HUMBLE OF HEART."..He ordered demons and they left, He commanded sickness and it evaporated. but I have never known Him to demand obedience. obedience, if it is true, comes out of LOYALTY, which is based on LOVE....Praise, Adoration, Obedience, Worship, endurance are all free offerings from our thankful hearts. HE DESERVES IT. he does not demand it....He has always given a choice, he respects the free will he gave us.; in Dt. 28: reward for obed., punishment for disobed,because HE IS GENTLE AND HUMBLE OF HEART.


ChiRho said:
You offer up (along with Christ) YOUR bodies for your atonement of sins? This hardly sounds pure, and perhaps a little self-glorifying. Maybe you could explain.

Christ Offers Himself to God for the Atonement of our sins.( DIENEKES )
...(we hitch a ride with Him, in His offering, as we offer our living bodies to God; Rom.12;1.)...as if getting into His vehicle, which He drives to Heaven (perpetually, once & for all, one time for all time for all people.)

much like GETTING ON AN ELEVATOR. you put your body on the elevator,
the elevetor carries you up to the top floor and there you get to SEE your place (Eph. 2:6)

...this is not at all self glorifying. it is humbling to ride with him, in Him in HIS OFFERING........my inarticulate words cannot even begin to explain what happens when one offers his own living body to God at the Altar, during the Mass. but if you ever see before Consecration; They pour wine into a Chalice"THE WORD BECAME FLESH...a drop of water is dropped (into the wine which is to become His Blood) in the Chalice...He took on our humanity...(that drop of water is to become me), a partaker of His Divine Nature. THIS IS A SIGN FROM GOD; YOU & I SURRENDER OUR SOUL AND OUR HUMANITY, INTO CHRIST'S BODY & BLOOD, SOUL & DIVINITY
Only God Reveals as we OBEY. that is where SOLA FIDE can can lead you
behind the veil....

ChiRho said:
"We believe, teach, and confess that the sole rule and standard according to which all dogmas together with all teachers should be estimated and judged are the prophetic and apostolic Scriptures of the Old and of the New Testament alone..

We believe that (without "sole" and "alone")....+ God entrusts to The Church; Apostolic Authority, Sacred Tradition, The Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, and The Sacrifice of Thanksgiving.


ChiRho said:
"The Papacy also is nothing bu sheer enthusiasm, by which the Pope boasts that all rights exist in the shrine of his heart,

Sola Scriptura. Pax Christi ChiRho


I'm sorry but I can not agree with that statement (or accusation)....it seems to me like the words of some one with bitterness in his heart.

I will probably get arrested by the MOD for this too!

Carlos
 
Upvote 0

ChiRho

Confessional Lutheran Catholic
Mar 5, 2004
1,821
99
44
Fort Wayne
✟17,482.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Libertarian
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
BBAS 64 said:

Change of the preist hood, Where juses is the high preist in the order of Malkesidik [sp] a order that is eternal. He for fullied the 1 st not took it away. Veil= flesh interesting take on the temple veil that was rent in 2.


This is not the temple veil. Heb. 10:20 says "The new living path he opened for us through the veil (the "veil" meaning his flesh).


[QUOTE = BBAS64] You can not offer his flesh: [/QUOTE]

He commanded us; Mt. 26:26-29 & Lk. 22:19,20 & Mal.1:11 & Ps. 116:12
He offers His own Flesh ,Blood, Soul, and Divinity at every Mass Through the Apostolic Authority Given to the Priest and the priestly people.
Rev. 11:1 & Heb. 13:10

BBAS64 said:
All sacrifices to God must be pure with out spot, I do not see one as more pure than the other Pure is Pure.

Mal.1:11...and everywhere they bring sacrifice to my name, and a pure offering; For great is my name among the nations, says the Lord of Hosts.
(at EVERY MASS)

BBAS64 said:
.......Unless you are talking about soap!

I am talking about THE FLESH AND BLOOD OF THE NEW COVENANT;
Mt. 26:26-29 and 1 Peter 2:24..."in His own Body...(his Flesh)
Heb. 9:29..."thinks THE COVENANT BLOOD....... to be ordinary,........"

BBAS64 said:
Peace to u,Bill


and may you enter into God's Rest,
Heb.4:11
Carlos
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Rising_Suns said:
I don't know if it has been discussed yet, but could someone please tell me where in the Bible does it say that the Bible is the sole and exclusive authority of God's word?


Thanks, Rising_Suns,
You have just asked the second most important question of (5) centuries.
I have offered all my relatives a $99.98 reward if any one of them can find THAT VERSE....as well as the verse that says that we are justified by Faith Alone. So far no one has found either of those verses.
although there have been many submitted that ALMOST seem to suggest or imply the origin on which both of those teachings are founded.

but I did run across a written "Sola Fide" that was used in Worship prior to 1274 a.d.

Good Luck, Carlos
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,049
1,801
60
New England
✟616,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good Day, Carlos

Where is my Money, I have given you 2 bibles with in the historic record of the Faith that in Romans used Faith Alone in the orginal language, have you verified them?

Bill
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,049
1,801
60
New England
✟616,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good Day, Carlos and Rising _Son

I do belive there is an open invite to Debate Sola Scriptura with Matt in the formal debate section. The op here is about the verse in used by the poster with reguards to the meaning of that verse. I t has been posted by a few here that the Grammer used presents a view that this verse does not exclude Sola Scriptura nor can it.

Carlos has maintained in this thread that some "form" of worship is Historical there fore some what authoritative. While he agrees on the Historic foundations the the Scripture is known to men and the standards used to come to the conclusion of what Scripture is. He has failed IMO to put his assertion to the same standard used to derive the Scripture, he has said that there is some package deal of 2 things that are identified seperately. Scripture is based in history the other part of his "package" is subjective and lacks consistant historical eveidance.

Peace to u,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

A. believer

Contributor
Jun 27, 2003
6,196
216
64
✟29,960.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Rising_Suns said:
I don't know if it has been discussed yet, but could someone please tell me where in the Bible does it say that the Bible is the sole and exclusive authority of God's word?
That's like me asking you, can you tell me where it says that we're supposed to worship Mary? I always wonder why you guys expect us to defend propositions we're not making?
 
Reactions: ChiRho
Upvote 0

A. believer

Contributor
Jun 27, 2003
6,196
216
64
✟29,960.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Hi Carlos,

Are you familiar with the concept of necessary inference?
 
Upvote 0

ChiRho

Confessional Lutheran Catholic
Mar 5, 2004
1,821
99
44
Fort Wayne
✟17,482.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Libertarian
Are you familiar with the concept of necessary inference?

Ooh! Ooh! I am! I am!

Does it mean that from the following verses (and many more), that we can come to only one undeniable conclusion?


Ephesians

8 For (21) by grace you have been saved (22) through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is (23) the gift of God;
9 (24) not as a result of works
, so that (25) no one may boast.



Galatians

1 (1) It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore (2) keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a (3) yoke of slavery.
2 Behold I, (4) Paul, say to you that if you receive (5) circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you.
3 And I (6) testify again to every man who receives (7) circumcision, that he is under obligation to (8) keep the whole Law.
4 You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have (9) fallen from grace.
5 For we through the Spirit, by faith, are (10) waiting for the hope of righteousness.
6 For in (11) Christ Jesus (12) neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but (13) faith working through love.
7 You were (14) running well; who hindered you from obeying the truth?
8 This persuasion did not come from (15) Him who calls you.
9 (16) A little leaven leavens the whole lump of dough.
10 (17) I have confidence in you in the Lord that you (18) will adopt no other view; but the one who is (19) disturbing you will bear his judgment, whoever he is.
11 But I, brethren, if I still preach circumcision, why am I still (20) persecuted? Then (21) the stumbling block of the cross has been abolished.
12 I wish that (22) those who are troubling you would even (23) mutilate themselves.

Romans

28 For (46) we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.


Sola Fide!
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
BBAS 64 said:
Good Day, Carlos

Where is my Money, I have given you 2 bibles with in the historic record of the Faith that in Romans used Faith Alone in the orginal language, have you verified them?

Bill

No , I have not verified them, I have not been to the library yet.
from the dates you gave me they appear to have been written around the time of the reformation, were they not?

The original BIBLE was officially decided by the Council of Hippo, 393 a.d.
and Carthage, 397 a.d. All translations officially recognized by the Church
( even as late as the original King James Bible ) in other words; what the Magisterium of the Holy Roman Catholic Church acknowledges as a VALID translation of the Bible, I will also acknowledge.

I will not consider as "OFFICIAL" any Bibles such as Jehovah Witnesses, Chick Publications, nor any lunatic, woodtic, heretic, politic, fly-by-night, start my own church, start my own bible, etc...not nostradomus, nor a second cousin of Isaiah, nor one by Jonah's hair stylist. not even a bible by ONE OF JESUS' BROTHERS.

Not because I'm cheap but
because I Love THE TRUTH
Carlos
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,049
1,801
60
New England
✟616,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Carlos Vigil said:
No , I have not verified them, I have not been to the library yet.
from the dates you gave me they appear to have been written around the time of the reformation, were they not?
Good Day, Carlos

I will have to go back and check the dates.

I understand your assertion here, Even though we agreed in this thread that the Scriptures where based on an historical view of many documents out side of what the scripture them selves contain. What did the ECF before the local council in 397 do with reguards to Scripture?


Kind of reminds me of a disscusion between a Roman Catholic and a morman. My guy is better than yours, my extra biblical sources are more historical than yours are. " no there not, Yes they are because my guys say so" Circular arguments are fun to observe where they be from Catholics, mormans, JW, or even David Koresh types.

Peace to u,

Bill
 
Upvote 0

ChiRho

Confessional Lutheran Catholic
Mar 5, 2004
1,821
99
44
Fort Wayne
✟17,482.00
Faith
Lutheran
Politics
US-Libertarian
Have a great weekend Carlos.

Pax Christi,

ChiRho
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying there BBAS64,
If you are saying THERE IS historical evidence of how scripture was determined and the standard (or canon) by which it was decided.
BUT
The other part of the package (TRADITION ) what the present Church INHERITED ...A certain "Form of Worship" ( THE MASS ) , ( LITURGY )

is subjective and lacks historical evidence??? (is this what you are saying?)


If I put on my Protestant sun glasses I can see that M.Luther threw away
All tradition , the good with the bad.... He Threw away The MASS...He threw away the PRIESTHOOD, THE POPE, THE BISHOPS the entire Heirarchy, the Apostolic Authority Given By Christ to the Apostles AND their successors.
Threw away THE ALTAR

All he kept was The Bible alone, and Faith alone.(Lutherans & Anglicans kept
the altars but ADDED the word "SYMBOLICALLY"
Historical evidence reveals that ( compared to an Easter egg ) He (or they,
the reformers ) threw away the EGG but held on to the egg SHELL.
now it is taught that this is all one needs.
the rest has been "ADDED BY MAN"

If I put on my Catholic sun glasses , I can see that the egg-shell is good
and so is the rest of the egg....INSIDE the egg is The New Covenant IN MY BLOOD
God is interested in NEW COVENANT KEEPERS.
He is interested in Those who Worship AT THE ALTAR...
He is Pleading "by the Mercy of God" for us to OFFER OUR LIVING BODIES
He is offering us (who are w/o wheels) a free ride to Glory in a vehicle more eloquent than a 747, but we say"I already have a symbol(a print) of a 747, plus my belief in my symbol."

"How often I have wanted to gather you as a mother hen gathers her baby chicks under her wing, BUT YOU WOULD NOT LET ME!"

What 's a mother hen to do?
Carlos
 
Upvote 0

Carlos Vigil

Veteran
Mar 14, 2004
1,518
69
Spokane, Wa.
✟2,026.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
BBAS 64 said:
Good Day, Carlos

What did the ECF before the local council in 397 do with reguards to Scripture?

Hi BBAS64
They (the Apostles, and their successors)collected what was written, they discerned what they believed was inlpired by thr Holy Spirit, consistent with what Jesus taught them, they held and taught what was agreed upon as TRUE to the Teaching of Christ. until the Bible was finalized.
what was finalized is still i n the Catholic Bible. what was not included in the Bible is still available in the archives of the Vatican.


Even football fans, or baseball fans...
What is the name of the Church Where you attend or Baptized into?

I attend at The curch of the uncurcumcised of heart and ear who always oppost the Holy Spirit




Carlos
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.