• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Does the pope need an editor?

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,360
66,656
Woods
✟5,981,693.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

The pope’s recent interview in America magazine comes across as a first draft in need of editing.​



(RNS) — The pope’s interview last month with America, the Jesuit journal, was a textbook example of why the Vatican does not want the pope doing interviews. The pope poked the Russian bear in the nose, gave a convoluted response to why women cannot be priests and even had a muddled response to a question on racism in the United States.

If I had been his press secretary, I would have been pulling my hair out during much of the interview. I would have wanted to edit the text before it was published.

Some of his responses were noncontroversial and even inspiring — for example, on how he remains joyful and happy amid crises and troubles. His analysis of how political polarization is un-Christian was spot on. He also acknowledged that it is a mistake for the church to have less transparency in dealing with abusive bishops than it has with abusive priests.

Continued below.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarriorAngel

pdudgeon

Traditional Catholic
Site Supporter
In Memory Of
Aug 4, 2005
37,852
12,353
South East Virginia, US
✟493,233.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican

The pope’s recent interview in America magazine comes across as a first draft in need of editing.​



(RNS) — The pope’s interview last month with America, the Jesuit journal, was a textbook example of why the Vatican does not want the pope doing interviews. The pope poked the Russian bear in the nose, gave a convoluted response to why women cannot be priests and even had a muddled response to a question on racism in the United States.

If I had been his press secretary, I would have been pulling my hair out during much of the interview. I would have wanted to edit the text before it was published.

Some of his responses were noncontroversial and even inspiring — for example, on how he remains joyful and happy amid crises and troubles. His analysis of how political polarization is un-Christian was spot on. He also acknowledged that it is a mistake for the church to have less transparency in dealing with abusive bishops than it has with abusive priests.

Continued below.
does he need an editor? Nope.
All he needs to do is to take a breath, think for a moment on which question ( of the many that are raised) does he feel compelled to answer.
Then do so.
If he will do that, and choose wisely, he will come off much better.
 
Upvote 0

Gnarwhal

☩ Broman Catholic ☩
Oct 31, 2008
20,864
12,596
38
Northern California
✟498,987.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
He'll never do this, but he should start by publicly acknowledging a lot of these publications are poseurs. America Mag, NCReporter, etc. Call em out and say "you're not Catholic, and nobody in communion with the Holy See will ever be authorized to give you an interview again until you shape up." I'd love to see their heads explode Francis, of all people, did that.
 
Upvote 0

WarriorAngel

I close my eyes and see you smile
Site Supporter
Apr 11, 2005
73,951
10,060
United States Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟597,590.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private

The pope’s recent interview in America magazine comes across as a first draft in need of editing.​



(RNS) — The pope’s interview last month with America, the Jesuit journal, was a textbook example of why the Vatican does not want the pope doing interviews. The pope poked the Russian bear in the nose, gave a convoluted response to why women cannot be priests and even had a muddled response to a question on racism in the United States.

If I had been his press secretary, I would have been pulling my hair out during much of the interview. I would have wanted to edit the text before it was published.

Some of his responses were noncontroversial and even inspiring — for example, on how he remains joyful and happy amid crises and troubles. His analysis of how political polarization is un-Christian was spot on. He also acknowledged that it is a mistake for the church to have less transparency in dealing with abusive bishops than it has with abusive priests.

Continued below.
He needs a full time translator even IN interviews.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,360
66,656
Woods
✟5,981,693.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0