Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ok so you admit that you get an F in history. I understand nothing ventured nothing gained.The problem is that you are the ignorant student. I have not even tried to teach you. So as of now you get an F. If you want me to help you to learn then you can grade me. Otherwise I will merely point out your errors. If you want me to help you to learn then you can grade me after the attempt.
If you want to consider Noah an archetype go ahead. There is no conflict between the Bible and Science. They go hand in hand and you can not understand one with out the other. If it were not for Abraham and Moses you would not even have any science today. Do you understand the significance of recorded history? You keep wanting the throw the history book away. How is that any different then Isis over in Iraq trying to destroy the museums and the artifacts that are thousands of years old? Why does Isis want to destroy our historical heritage?
Ok so you admit that you get an F in history. I understand nothing ventured nothing gained.
Hardly. You know practically nothing of the sciences so me claiming that I know more than you ever possibly could is not that large of a claim.
What are you nattering about? When people will not accept science it does very little good to offer them any. Most creationists are creationists not, and let me emphasize this, not because they are idiots, but because they will not let themselves learn relatively simple science. It seems to be caused by their fear of reality. Creationists tend to have the a weak sort of faith that is "all or nothing". The problem is that their version of "all" is wrong.
And since the existence of Satan is even more dubious than the existence of a god that part of your post makes no sense. Also I have never opposed "God's word"
And I could make a comment that you are so full of it that that is all you have in your house.
dad, if you want to debate rationally I would be more than happy to. If you want to break the rules and attack me personally then this thread will be closed in no time.
Comparing Moses to Spider Man is like comparing Darwin to Magilla Gorilla.
I don't get to sway you. The evidence you seek is all around you.
But if you only look as far as what your eyes see, then you will be fooled by the facade...which is intentional, to confound those who have no interest in seeing an unseen God.
If that is you...then the [natural] seen world is it for you, life remains purely organic, and when the body dies so does the natural spirit.
I, as millions of witnesses down through all of history, can only convey the information. As for believing and evidence...that is on you. All the best to you.
The line of logic runs down through all of recorded history.
We do not try to justify it, but to share it and speak of it as the unseen facts that have been made known to us.
The view over the horizon has not been seen by all, but we who have seen, have a voice that is as consistent as the times allow.
You have heard our witness. "We" have no need to provide evidence for what we "know", nor could we provide you with what must be seen, unless you yourself go.
The natural-world example was discovering the "new" world. Some went, and some stayed and made foolish demands from the shore.
The invitation is to stay, or to go. If you stay, it is our witness that life is simply organic and ends at natural death. It is also our witness that if you choose to go, then life does not end at natural death. You have nothing to loose. But not having seen, the door [of invitation] is open, and the choice is yours.
I apologize if that all sounds arrogant to you, but it is no more arrogant than us going to see a movie and you deciding not to go. We wouldn't need to prove anything to you, nor could we. You either go, or you don't. The only other thing we could do is buy your ticket for you...and we have.
I don't think that's going to matter here, Joshua.It is a myth that anyone ever believed in a flat earth.
Has his handwriting been authenticated by experts?We have Darwin's own writings,
How do you know they weren't inserted after-the-fact?KTS said:... accounts of him by his contemporaries.
I dunno.KTS said:We can trace his family line.
Science is myopic.KTS said:Can't do that with Moses.
It really burns you that Darwin was a literal person, and Jesus wasn't.Has his handwriting been authenticated by experts?How do you know they weren't inserted after-the-fact?I dunno.
I bet the names of his mother's line is different from the names of his father's line.
Looks like Darwin wasn't the man we've thought he was after all, doesn't it?
Science is myopic.
Well, the bible certainly wasn't used by Christians to teach the earth was a sphere. Go figure.I don't think that's going to matter here, Joshua.
They have found what they think is flat earth cosmology in the Bible.
So whether it was taught in the past or not makes no difference.
They're willing to suspend any science to the contrary, and even figures of speech, to claim the Bible teaches it.
Your faith is showing.It really burns you that Darwin was a literal person, and Jesus wasn't.
I won't argue that.Well, the bible certainly wasn't used by Christians to teach the earth was a sphere.
No science, nothing interesting or worthwhile...congrats, for a usual post of yours.
No, we really know that Darwin was a real person. We have real eyewitness accounts. You don't. We have writings by the man, you don't. We have photographs of the man, you don't.Your faith is showing.
Yes...we know. Empty blab.The lack of science ...
Thanks for admitting once again that you have nothing. We all have known that for years. But the offer to educate still stands.Yes...we know. Empty blab.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?