Does science actually admit "design"?

[VirOptimus]

At one time? Would that be blinding?

Not in a perfect system.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

How arrogant.

Be careful of that swinging door.

 

[VirOptimus]

Be careful of that swinging door.

Your flaws are your own to confront.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Not in a perfect system.

Maybe one is on the way via evolution. Remember that you have discounted creation, so all shortcomings are evolutionary.

 

[VirOptimus]

Maybe one is on the way via evolution. Remember that you have discounted creation, so all shortcomings are evolutionary.

Yes, and? Its you who belives in something perfect (your god), not I.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Your flaws are your own to confront.

I'm not interesting in a spitting contest. Address the aperature/upside down image/brain topic, and explain how it all evolved.

 

[VirOptimus]

I'm not interesting in a spitting contest. Address the aperature/upside down image/brain topic, and explain how it all evolved.

I’m not responsible for your education.

The information is freely available.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Yes, and? Its you who belives in something perfect (your god), not I.

But God didn't say "perfect" at creation. He said "very good". We qualify things today using the same terms. Perfection won't be realized until the resurrection and restoration.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

I’m not responsible for your education.

The information is freely available.

It was unknown to you a few moments ago (you're welcome).

 

[VirOptimus]

But God didn't say "perfect" at creation. He said "very good". We qualify things today using the same terms. Perfection won't be realized until the resurrection and restoration.

I dont believe in god(s).

And our vision is not something special in nature.

 

[VirOptimus]

It was unknown to you a few moments ago (you're welcome).

No it wasnt.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

How arrogant.

Recall my dirty lake comments. Science concludes they need more study. My conclusion is to remove the excess weeds.

 

[VirOptimus]

Recall my dirty lake comments. Science concludes they need more study. My conclusion is to remove the excess weeds.

Yes and? Your totally not made up example is a non sequitur.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

No it wasnt.

Why the "Enlighten me" comment?

 

[VirOptimus]

Why the "Enlighten me" comment?

Because I thought your point was something else.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Yes and? Your totally not made up example is a non sequitur.

?

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Because I thought your point was something else.

I was addressing Sarah's oft repeated ignorance concerning our eyes. I included you as......a courtesy.

 

[VirOptimus]

?

It means nothing.

Also, anecdotes proves nothing.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

It means nothing.

Also, anecdotes proves nothing.

It means a great deal to me, and demonstrates that science isn't always useful for solving practical problems.

 

[VirOptimus]

It means a great deal to me, and demonstrates that science isn't always useful for solving practical problems.

See my former post.