Quiet the opposite, you are reading into the text of Luke 21:20-21, the abomination of desolation and reference to Daniel the prophets writings - which partial preterists never ever use Daniel 12:4 to promote their "man-made" position.
You can't broad brush Preterism with 1 brush.
There are a plethora of Preterist views, from both Partial and Full..........It seems that Partial Preterism is stuck in the middle of the road between Futurism and Full Preterism......[I am leaning more and more to full fulfillment, but not quite there yet].
A few links to preterist discussions on Daniel 12 for your perusal:
Daniel Chapter 12: A Preterist Commentary - Revelation Revolution
Daniel Chaptr 12:4: A Preterist Commentary: The Scroll Sealed in v. 4 is the same Scroll opened in Revelation. Therefore, Revelation must have been written during “the Time of the End.”
Here Daniel reveals the source of his revelations: a heavenly scroll. The scroll sealed in this v. is the same scroll opened by the Lamb at the beginning of Revelation. This fact helps explain the similar symbolism, content and writing style shared in these two books. According to v. 4, this scroll is to remain sealed until “the time of the end.” If it is true that both prophets received their information from the same heavenly scroll, it can then be concluded that the Book of Revelation was written during the end time.
The increase in knowledge predicted in v. 4 to a large extent is due to the unsealing of the information on the scroll sealed in this verse. The increase in knowledge at the end of the age may also be said to be fulfilled in Romans 16:25-26, Ephesians 3:3-5 and Ephesians 3:9-10.
5Then I, Daniel, looked, and there before me stood two others, one on this bank of the river and one on the opposite bank. 6One of them said to the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, “How long will it be before these astonishing things are fulfilled?” 7The man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, lifted his right hand and his left hand toward heaven, and I heard him swear by him who lives forever, saying, “It will be for a time, times and half a time.
When the power of the holy people has been finally broken, all these things will be completed.”
========================================
A Full Preterist Response to Kenneth Gentry’s Articles: DANIEL 12, TRIBULATION, AND RESURRECTION and ACTS 24:15 AND THE ALLEGED NEARNESS OF THE RESURRECTION | fullpreterism.com
In a nut shell, that is the full preterist view on the judgment and resurrection of the living and dead between AD 30 – AD 70.
The only difference between progressive partial preterists and full preterists at this point is that full preterists do not go beyond what is written and make up an additional “already/becoming/not yet” eschaton beyond AD 70 which allegedly involves a casket resurrection at the end of history – to appease the creeds and or creedal supporters and publishers.
Conclusion
If no written or printed response is forthcoming from Mr. Gentry and his co-authors of
WSTTB? to our second edition of
HD, then I will conclude with Gary North’s kind of logic in these matters and that this debate is over because no consistent exegetical one can be given.
I wanted to express my sincere appreciation to the work that Mr. Gentry and his co-authors and anti-full preterist associates have done thus far in demonstrating what full preterists have been saying all along: the “one” Second Coming or “THE parousia” of Christ attended with the one judgment and resurrection of the living and dead was a process from AD 30 to AD 70 for Israel coming out of her old covenant world/body and into the her new covenant world/body, was spiritual, corporate, resulting in the souls of men such as Daniel (Daniel 12:13) being raised out of Hades or Abraham’s Bosom to close the old covenant age in AD 70.
This article has proven that progressive partial preterists have indeed “given the farm away” to full preterism when it comes to the judgment and resurrection of the dead. This used to be the defining difference between the two views, but as we have seen Gentry and his progressive partial preterist associates have only stolen our AD 70 judgment and resurrection view of the living and dead (w/out giving us credit) and simply asserted with no exegetical evidence that such passages as John 5:28-29; Acts 24:15YLT; 1 Corinthians 15; and Revelation 20 teach two fulfillments or that a biological resurrection at the end of time is present in any of these passages.
Gentry co-authored a book entitled,
HOUSE DIVIDED THE BREAK-UP OF DISPENSATIONAL THEOLOGY in which he and others demonstrated that
progressive dispensationalists have given the farm away to covenant theology/eschatology and thus there remains nothing left to dispensationalism. They must accept that their house is falling apart and cannot stand or accept covenant theology/eschatology. Gentry is now on the receiving end of this kind of logic. Our “House Divided” book has demonstrated without a shadow of doubt that
progressive partial preterists such as Gentry, DeMar, McDurmon and Mathison combined with the classical amillennial and creedal views form full preterism and they can either accept this or watch their house continue to fall at the feet of full preterism.
=======================
Daniel 12 — The Book of Daniel in Preterist Perspective
4. But thou, O Daniel,
shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
Shut up the words, and seal the book — Daniel is commanded to seal the book of his prophecy until the time when it will be fulfilled. Compare this commandment with the commandment of the angel in Revelation: “And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand” (Revelation 22:10).
The time of the end — The time when these prophecies shall be fulfilled.
5. Then I Daniel looked, and, behold, there stood other two, the one on this side of the bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank of the river.
6. And one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?
7. And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.
8. And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
9. And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
10. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.
11. And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and
the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a
thousand two hundred and ninety days.
The abomination that maketh desolate — Jesus refers to this in Matthew 24:15,16, “When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand
” – “whoso readeth” is a reference to Daniel 12:11.
Luke 21:20 further defines the nature of “the abomination that maketh desolate” – “And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.” According to Luke’s parallel passage, the presence of the Roman armies is what made the Temple sacrifices “desolate.”
Thousand two hundred and ninety days — This is roughly three-and-a-half years. This refers to the Roman-Jewish War and the Siege of Jerusalem from spring of AD 67 to the destruction of the Temple in September of 70. Ve
=====================
