Hey Foghorn (you are in red),
Man has to believe (have faith in Christ) for salvation; since man, of himself is not able, God gives them (His elect) the gift of faith, it them becomes their faith, since man has a responsibility, it is this faith, the gift, which is theirs now, that he uses for salvation.
Glory to God alone!
why is one of the arguments used against "free-willers" that they are taking God off the throne? If God uses men in these other capacities to share a role in bringing about salvation in the lives of individuals, why can't He use the individual's free-will decision and receive no less glory by doing so.
Man does not have that ability. If man was able, man would share in God's glory.
I don't understand why you say this. All ability comes from God in the first place.Man is able to breathe. Do we share in God’s glory because He has given all men the ability to breathe?
Also, man delivers a gospel message that has been given to men, passed on orally and written through men. It is presented to men who are asked to believe it with their faith and you say it is God alone. Yes, He alone gets the glory, but He certainly involves man in the process. How beautiful are the feet of those… Again, the whole process looks synergistic to me, and yes, He still gets all the glory. Then God synergistically works in, with, and through man in a life-long sanctification process, but still He gets all the glory. It seems God doesn’t have a problem working with His creation and having His creation work with Him.
If it were God’s will to have man believe in Him with an ability that He had provided to all men, then that is His sovereign prerogative and He would receive no less glory by involving man in this capacity.
Man has to believe (have faith in Christ) for salvation; since man, of himself is not able, God gives them (His elect) the gift of faith, it them becomes their faith, since man has a responsibility, it is this faith, the gift, which is theirs now, that he uses for salvation.
Glory to God alone!
why is one of the arguments used against "free-willers" that they are taking God off the throne? If God uses men in these other capacities to share a role in bringing about salvation in the lives of individuals, why can't He use the individual's free-will decision and receive no less glory by doing so.
Man does not have that ability. If man was able, man would share in God's glory.
I don't understand why you say this. All ability comes from God in the first place.Man is able to breathe. Do we share in God’s glory because He has given all men the ability to breathe?
Also, man delivers a gospel message that has been given to men, passed on orally and written through men. It is presented to men who are asked to believe it with their faith and you say it is God alone. Yes, He alone gets the glory, but He certainly involves man in the process. How beautiful are the feet of those… Again, the whole process looks synergistic to me, and yes, He still gets all the glory. Then God synergistically works in, with, and through man in a life-long sanctification process, but still He gets all the glory. It seems God doesn’t have a problem working with His creation and having His creation work with Him.
If it were God’s will to have man believe in Him with an ability that He had provided to all men, then that is His sovereign prerogative and He would receive no less glory by involving man in this capacity.
Last edited:
Upvote
0