Does 'Goddidit' constitute an explanation?

[Doveaman]

Doveaman, why do you keep saying that science is wrong and some kind of evil ploy to mislead the people, and then wheel out your own 'scientific' evidence for your ideas?

Not all science is wrong.

 

[SkyWriting]

Actually, I think they are marveling at your conversation rather than mine, but let’s ask them shall we?

Are there any other non-believers here who have noticed a tendency for Christians to evade questions?

What do you think of that evasive behavior?

Oh, I see one person has already noticed that tendency.

I wonder how many others here have noticed.

I had faith that at least one of your imaginary friends would have shown up to support you.
Even if you had to create a new account and do it your self. My faith has let me down.
Please.....do not appeal to your imaginary audience again.
I don't care if you imagine they're on your side or mine.
It's really poor debate form.

I take that back.
Keep it up. I'm not likely to read it anyway.

 

[SkyWriting]

Originally Posted by Nostromo
Doveaman, why do you keep saying that science is wrong and some kind of evil ploy to mislead the people, and then wheel out your own 'scientific' evidence for your ideas?

Not all science is wrong.

Science has two sides. The published side is 5% delusional on esoteric topics that have virtually no grounding in repeatable laboratory work. Historians and philosophers hanging on the coattails of people who work for a living.
Anybody in in the "Source of Life" Sciences is in that category.
That includes both sides in this forum. And I imagine the % is actually lower.
The other 95-98% of science was birthed by Christian leaders in their fields and is fine.

 

[ChrisBot]

This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically closed.
The new thread automatically created is here: "Does 'Goddidit' constitute an explanation? (2)"