• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does 'Goddidit' constitute an explanation? (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
 
Upvote 0

Jnwaco

Regular Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,376
49
✟24,303.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
Because it's an interesting question. Because people, through the ages, have been able to ask it.

Yes, it is an interesting question. But that's irrelevant.

Yes, many have asked it. But it remains unanswered.

You said science needs to be able to answer why we are here. I say you first need to tell me why that question needs to be answered. Why there needs to be a why. Why we need a reason for existence.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,700
52,520
Guam
✟5,132,140.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why does the existence of the universe need a reason?
Because God is Love --- a higher form of love --- called "agape".

Agape love requires an object of affection; thus He made us as that object.

Someone that He can bestow gifts upon.

It's the kind of love that says, "I'd give you the world if I could" --- and that's just what He did when He turned it over to Adam.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I agree the question is really irrelevant for Christians. Just interested in hearing atheists' answers or thoughts. Most will say the question is meaningless and ignore it. Others find it interesting. Interesting questions should have answers.

I find it interesting, but I don't think there's a objective answer.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP

That answers 'why?', not 'why why?'.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
48
Burnaby
Visit site
✟36,546.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
I agree the question is really irrelevant for Christians. Just interested in hearing atheists' answers or thoughts. Most will say the question is meaningless and ignore it. Others find it interesting. Interesting questions should have answers.

No. If they have answers, they are less interesting. It's the questions for which we don't yet have answers that are the most interesting.
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship

AV... here's the thing that confuses me about what you are doing here...

If you want to believe stuff that is contradicted by science, really, that is your prerogative. So if you want to handwave away anything, even the most well supported science on the basis of conflict with the Bible, well, really thats your call.

I can respect that, really I can... but what I DON'T get, is why you keep coming in telling people you don't believe this science stuff... we get it, you don't buy what rigorous scientific investigation says. OK. Fine.

But given that you implicitly accept that your position is unscientific, that your beliefs are directly contradictory to what the scientific method of investigation reveals... what do you expect those of us who practice the scientific method to do? Suddenly give it up and buy into your POV because... well, because you say we should? Or what? I mean, what do you hope to achieve here? I mean, I'm sure you understand that most people in this forum will only accept revised scientific understanding when NEW scientific evidence comes to light, so, since you're not actually trying to refute scientific information with BETTER scientific information... what do you expect to happen?
 
Upvote 0

Ellinas

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2009
424
32
✟727.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm still waiting for science to find a good answer as to why we're here. I'm not holding my breath.
I am still waiting for religion to find a good answer as to why did the little bug fly into my mouth while I was riding my bicycle while panting? Did God want to give me more sustenance in the form of proteins or was he punishing the bug?
Was it destined by God to enter my gaping mouth and thus be involuntarily consumed!
Surely there is an INTELLIGENCE behind this event?

Sorry but can't hold my breath; still panting!

 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
That's the same argument the anthropic principle devolves into after a while. We're here, so X must be true. It's a tautology. You're answering the question "how did we get here with an infinite past" by saying "we're here".
No, I'm not. I'm saying that your objection to an eternal universe is unfounded.
 
Upvote 0

Jnwaco

Regular Member
Jan 26, 2010
1,376
49
✟24,303.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
No, I'm not. I'm saying that your objection to an eternal universe is unfounded.


No, actually it's a perpetually unanswered philisophical problem. Just because you say it's unfounded doesn't make it so. In fact it's been unanswered since at least 580AD when John Philoponus asked it. And saying "we're here, so an infinite past is no problem" is indeed a tautology.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟39,231.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
No, actually it's a perpetually unanswered philisophical problem. Just because you say it's unfounded doesn't make it so.
Naturally, but I provided an argument for my case. Feel free to refute it. Just because you say it's perpetually unanswered doesn't make it so .
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
First it was Creationism and when that failed to convince they tried Creation science, then ID, then Electric Universe!

I wonder what they will come up with next?
The Electric Universe theory isn't held by most Christians as being on par with "Creation science" or "ID'. It's a scientific theory that a few Christians agree with, like myself. So I wouldn't paint all Christians with the same brush regarding this theory.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Could you just clear it up for me and tell me what it is that you actually believe, and why scientists confirming Plasma Cosmology would change your mind while the Big Bang would not, despite the fact it seems to fit better with your religion?
I admire your honesty regarding the religious resemblance of Big Bang theory.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You WANT to believe an intelligent creator created the universe so you interpret patterns in that fashion.
You WANT to believe the Big Bang "exploded" into the universe so you interpret patterns in that fashion.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

You are correct. Evolution isn't a mechanism. Biological evolution has taken place ever since animals were put on this earth through both natural & artificial selection.
I don't care if people treat me like a nutcase as long as they make a good case when they talk.
"Age constraints on the Doushantuo Formation are rather weak."
So if you want me to believe you have single cell fossils from the beginning of life, then you have a weak case. Then there are assumptions built into the dating methods as well, even if it was a "strong" case.



Cavalier King Charles.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.