Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We have proof beyond all reasonable doubt, though, which is good enough, and as good as we can get.What evidence do we have that this entire Christian Forum is nothing more than a computer program that has created thousands of fake user accounts that post comments that mimicking arguments that people would likely have regarding religion, politics, and philosophy?
For all I know, all of you supposed users are nothing more than the outcome of a simulated computer program. Likewise none of you have any proof that I am actually a human.
Sheer statistics - no such program has been demonstrated, and it's supremely unlikely that it would be let loose on CF. Rather, it's more likely that you're a human making a philosophical pointWhat proof is that?
What proof do you have that I am not part of a computer program simulated response?
Sheer statistics - no such program has been demonstrated, and it's supremely unlikely that it would be let loose on CF. Rather, it's more likely that you're a human making a philosophical point
Ah, now we're getting somewhere. This is very different from what you've been saying before: "I probably have free will" is different to "I definitely have free will". But, I am not making any claims, far-fetched or otherwise, I'm just pointing out alternatives to your claim that you do indeed have free will.as I said before, I have no reason to believe otherwise. I see no evidence that those far fetched claims of yours contain any truth so I doubt them.
Hmm, isn't that what a computer would say? You won't pass the Turing test with thatIt is true that I am human or at at least I believe myself to be human.
Epistemologically, knowledge cannot be attained without proof. If you cannot prove it, you do not know it. Colloquially, however, 'knowledge' is more akin to 'scientific fact' - we have sufficient evidence that it is true, to the extent that it's proven beyond all reasonable doubt. This is what I meant when in my above discussion with Chris81.I think you are misunderstanding me. I know I have free will, just as I know the Earth is round, I know the effects of gravity will be in place tomorrow, and I know if I inhale enough water, I will die. Now can I prove it? No! But the word know is defined as:
To perceive or understand as fact or truth; to apprehend clearly and with certainly (from dictionary.com)
In other words, to "know" simply means to be convinced beyond a shadow of doubt.
So when I say I know I have free, I am actually saying: I perceive and understand as fact or truth that I have free will. This I apprehend clearly and with certainly
How do you know your choosing process fits that description? From what you've described thus far, you only have the heartfelt belief that it does, but no real reason, be it internal or external, that it is indeed the case.At risk of sounding like a broken record, I am so convinced I have free will because I know the definition of free will and I know my choosing process fit that description.
(reply) Because the choosing process is a part of who I am; and until I am proven wrong, I will continue to know I am right.
now can you prove me wrong?
What makes you think your choices are voluntary?
I see no evidence that they are not, thus I believe they are
K
Well, that's different from your above claims. I know my car is outside because I can see it from my window here. I believe it'll run next time I turn the ignition because it's run in the past and I have no reason to believe otherwise.
So, I think your belief is reasonable however your claim of knowledge is not and I noticed you didn't say "I see no evidence that they are not, thus I know they are."
I believe they are and I know they are. To know simply means to believe beyond a shadow of doubt; proof isn't necessary.
K
So, you're saying that you see no evidence that your actions are not voluntary, so you KNOW they are?
Does that apply to God? You see no evidence that he exists, so you KNOW he doesn't exist?
A computer can control it's own "difficulty setting". I don't know many implementations that do it though. We people like to control.Does the computer control its own difficulty setting? or does it require an intelligent outside source to make this setting; I think you are making my case for me.
Not true. Computers can learn. For example, voice recognition software usually have learning cycle to adapt to the voice of the owner.I think learning is different than being programmed. When a computer is programmed to do something, it sticks with the program until someone changes it to allow it to do something else (different program) with learning, we decide what we do on our own and learning just adds to that which he have to choose to do on our own
It depends on how much you have been indoctrinated.sometimes all it takes is a simple introduction to the truth
A computer can control it's own "difficulty setting". I don't know many implementations that do it though. We people like to control.
Not true. Computers can learn. For example, voice recognition software usually have learning cycle to adapt to the voice of the owner.
It depends on how much you have been indoctrinated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?