• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does evolutionary thought propagate racism?

Crusadar

Criado de Cristo
Mar 28, 2003
485
12
MN
Visit site
✟23,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Arikay said this in Post #15:If you believe evolution propogates racism, then you need to read up more about evolution.

I said no such thing, I said "evolutionary thought" not the "sacred" evolutionary theory. There is a difference you know. And I know more about the sacred cow of evolution than I want to.

If anything, evolution has shown that racism has no basis and that we are all the same. :)

And how exactly has it done that? Racist feelings have always been there and will always be, it is just not expressed in the same way.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
And by the way what is your solution fo racism? Teach that there are no biological reasons for the differences in the races? It is a more difficult thing to do then you anticipate.

I think you are wrong about this. I don't have time to look it up but I recall reading that there is more genetic diversity among the people in Africa than among all the people outside Africa so while there are many different skin tones outside Africa it really only makes sense to speak of one race, the human race.

Lighter skin color apparently evolved as an adaptation to less sun shine in cooler climes. Different skin tones are linked to polymorphism in the melanocortin 1 receptor and perhaps a couple other factors have to do with the production of the hormones that regulate pigmentation and the cells that receive the pigment. I can do a serious essay on this over the weekend if anyone is interested. In any case, it makes no sense to separate races on the basis of polymorphisms in a couple of pigment genes.

These adaptations can prove counter productive if the people move back to the sunny clime, as certain genotypes are associated with a higher risk of skin cancer. Just ask the Aussies.

I know how the Barbarian picked the handle he uses. I remeber when he used a different name. Does anyone else here?

The Frumious Bandersnatch
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
42
Visit site
✟36,317.00
Faith
Taoist
I said no such thing, I said "evolutionary thought" not the "sacred" evolutionary theory. There is a difference you know. And I know more about the sacred cow of evolution than I want to.

:( are you sure you have gotten this knowledge of evolution from the correct sources?

And how exactly has it done that? Racist feelings have always been there and will always be, it is just not expressed in the same way.

Others have pointed out, that it has shown all "races" to be on the same spot on the evolutionary tree.

Racism has nothing to do with evolution, quite often it is spread by hate and lack of knowledge. Ignorance.
I doubt evolution (or creationism for that matter) will sway a racist from their views.

Today at 07:11 PM Crusadar said this in Post #21

Arikay said this in Post #15:If you believe evolution propogates racism, then you need to read up more about evolution.

I said no such thing, I said "evolutionary thought" not the "sacred" evolutionary theory. There is a difference you know. And I know more about the sacred cow of evolution than I want to.

If anything, evolution has shown that racism has no basis and that we are all the same. :)

And how exactly has it done that? Racist feelings have always been there and will always be, it is just not expressed in the same way.
 
Upvote 0

Crusadar

Criado de Cristo
Mar 28, 2003
485
12
MN
Visit site
✟23,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Arikay said this in Post #20: did you come here just to try to berate people?

I am not sure what you mean, that I am simply here to rebuke everyone? What makes you say that? I was simply pointing out that merely quoting an individual without understanding the reasoning behind their statement does not make a case for anything. And if I sound rash at times, then I apologize, but do realize that I am not attacking the person per se but what is being said.

sounds similiar as to saying that evolutionists were racist in the past, so evolution teaches racism.

No, only that many do not think things through and simply act on impulse or what they have been told, much like any system of belief or convention of man.

There is no evolutionary reason why people of different "races" are different. The best solution to many prejudices is to teach people not to hate and not to judge people before they know them. And to educate themselves.

Probably not, but what is the incintive or consequence for adhering to or not adhering to such teachings? What is to prevent one from promoting only their own needs, as oppose to others, when the very idea of evolution is grounded on the survival of the fittest. 

I know as a Christian my reasoning stems from my faith in God and His commandment that one must love their fellow man as themselves. Of course this does not always happen for many Christians because not everyone is able to abide but as a true believer I know the consequences if I don't. 

What does his name have to do with anything?

Probably nothing, I only asked out of curiousity, which is not a demand for an answer you know.
 
Upvote 0

Crusadar

Criado de Cristo
Mar 28, 2003
485
12
MN
Visit site
✟23,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
PM Frumious Bandersnatch said this in Post #22:

I think you are wrong about this.

Lets hope that you are right. But I believe that mere conventions of man whether it be creationism or evolution will not solve racism, prejudices, hatred or the like, there needs to be absolutes from a higher authority such as God.
 
Upvote 0

Crusadar

Criado de Cristo
Mar 28, 2003
485
12
MN
Visit site
✟23,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
panterapat said this in Post #12: It depends on your defination of racism.

By racism I am refering to hatred and prejudices not only of another people group but even one's own group.

All people are tribal by instinct. We want to be with people who are like us. Now just to desire to assocciate with people "like " you would not be racist, it would be an outgrowth of our tribal origins. Racism would be mote akin to shunning other "tribes."

If only that were true as not all individuals are inclined to conform to social standards you know. Also there are certain stigmas attached to certain people groups regardless of what laws or conventions are agreed on by man to extinguish such prejudices. I think it is in the very nature of man to look for things that will provide a basis for their hatred, whether it be creationism or evolution. From my experience evolutionary thinking has had the more dominant effect of generating prejudices of certain people groups.
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
42
Visit site
✟36,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Um, I really hope not.

I was asking how old the book that says that white people are of a more advanced race than others was. (a false and racist statement)

So I really hope the two stone tablets you are talking about, did not have those comments on them, as I would hope they werent racist.

:)

Crusader: How we solve the hatred of prejudice has nothing to do with evolution. We have to teach not to hate. After all, even christians have problems with prejudice (as shown by some um, "christian" people on this very board (not going to mention who, but it doesnt take too long to figure out. ;) ) )

Yesterday at 06:16 PM panterapat said this in Post #27

"Um, how old is the text book you are using?"

I'll give you a clue-
It was written on two stone tablets.

In Christ, Patrick
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
17th April 2003 at 08:05 PM Crusadar said this in Post #7 

So what you are saying that it doesn't? Then why are some people groups considered closer to the apes than others?

Have you forgotten the full title of Darwin's book: “On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."


Racism is a very strong meme that will use any other meme for justification.  The history is this in brief:

Before Darwin, racism was justified by creationism.  God created the different races and dark-skinned peoples were said to be beast.  Evolution orginally destroyed this argument for racism and racism be providing a common ancestor for all races.  Therefore all races were equally human.  Originally the biggest opponents of evolution were racists.

Now, the usage of words change.  In Darwin's day "races" correspond to what we today call "populations".  To the people of the time, the English were a race.  The Irish, Spaniards, Tahitians, aboriginal Australians, Germans, Scots, Iroquois, Sioux, Eskimos, etc. were all races.

Darwinism first started to get corrupted to racism by the Germans Virchow and Haeckel. They are the ones that came up with the idea of a "ladder" of races.  You can guess which race was on "top".

You can find all this documented in the books The Evolution of Racism by Stephanie Page and The Mismeasure of Man by Stephen Gould.

By pointing this out I am not calling evolutionists racists. What I am suggesting is that evolution is a basis for many racists beliefs. Is it not?

Everything has been turned into a "basis for many racist beliefs" over the centuries.  Racism takes whatever other ideas are around and uses them as justification for racism.  Are they really a justification for racism?  No.  But racism  will corrupt them so that they are.

"The foundation of modern "scientific" racism was Gobineau's (1853-5) Essay on the Inequality of Human Races. Arthur de Gobineau (1816-1882) was a one-time diplomat who held that humanity is divided into three races, white, yellow and black. He considered that his reasoning established that the black race had an "animal character, that appears in the shape of the pelvis"; has a crude yet powerful energy; and dull mental faculties but has an "intensity of desire". The yellow race has little physical energy; feeble desires; mediocrity; a respect for order; and "does not dream or theorise". The whites have an energetic intelligence, perseverance, instinct for order, love of liberty, and sense of honour; they can be cruel, but when they are "they are conscious of their cruelty; it is very, doubtful whether such a consciousness exists in the negro".
"Gobineau was, naturally enough for Europeans of his day, a Biblical literalist; and he remained so all his life, seeing in Darwinism a negation of his view that races always had been and always would be as they now are"
http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/cg_science_of_racism.htm
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Yesterday at 09:15 AM Crusadar said this in Post #25

Lets hope that you are right. But I believe that mere conventions of man whether it be creationism or evolution will not solve racism, prejudices, hatred or the like, there needs to be absolutes from a higher authority such as God.

It's a vain hope, because racism was originally justified by the "higher authority" of God. And is still justified by that.  Some examples:

Take a look at some of the dates of the books listed below:

Isaac de la Peyere, Preadamitae, 1655, English edition, Men Before Adam, 1656.  Peyere was a French theologian and Huguenot.  The book claimed that Adam was not the first man and that the Bible is not the history of mankind, but only  the history of the Jews.  He was censured by the Pope but kept looking for support for his theory.  Part of his rationale came from his interpretation of Paul's Epistle to the Romans.  His pre-Adamite theory later became the basis for 19th century theories of polygenism and modern racism.  You can see the thread yourself in the works below--other races not descended from Adam, just the white race.  A discussion of this work can be found in Encycl. Judaica, 1972.  So the idea of races did not originate with Darwin, but with a card-carrying Christian.  And the concept of racism came over 200 years *before* Origin of the Species was written.

Charles Carrol  The Negro a Beast; or, In the Image of God, 1900 American Book and Bible House.  "The Negro created a beast, but created with articulate speech, and hands, that he may be of service to his master -- the White man"  "All scientific investigation of the subject proves the Negro to be an ape, and that he simply stands at the head of the ape family." (of course, he is wrong about the science, since evolution shows all the races to belong to the same species)  Genesis prohibits mating with "beasts" [Negroes]:  they were created a different "kind".  God destroyed mankind in the worldwide Flood because man had corrupted his kind by amalgamation with Negro beasts.  Negroes were taken on the Ark along with other animals.  Has a chapter "The Theory of Evolution Exploded; Man was Created a Man, and Did Not Develop from an Ape"  Says there are only 2 origin theories, and they are in "absolute conflict":  biblical creation and atheistic evolution.

The Carrol book was so "good" that it served as the basis of a Destiny Publishers book, In the Image of God, 1967, Destiny Publishers.  "The Bible stands as an impregnable bulwark against Christendom's modern slogan that all men, regardless of color, are blood brothers ... The simple truth regarding the origin of races demonstrates conclusively that the Negroes and the white race do not have a common ancestry."  (quite a contrast to evolution, which says they do and are the same species)  The book goes on to cite many Bible passages proving the "beasts" are bipedal servants of "man" and distinct from other animals.  Presents scientific evidence of physiological differences which demonstrates that Negroes were created to be beasts of burden.  Cites A Hislop's The Two Babylons, 1916, to prove that Nimrod--founder of all false religions--was black.  The "atheistical theory of evolution" is a "spurious doctrine" which aligned itself with apostasy and led to "disbelief in the scientifically accurate but simply-worded statements of the Bible."

Walter T. Galusha Fossils and the Word of God, 1964, Exposition Press.  God divided man into four colors and wants them to stay separate.  The Devil, however, "will try to get them to unite and in this way defeat God's purpose."  Is standard creationist fare for the rest, including support for creation of Adam and Eve and Noah's Flood (2130 BC according to book).

Gottlieb C.H. Hasskarl, The Missing link, or, the Negroes Ethnological Status, 1898, Democratic News.  The title says it all.  Hasskarl also wrote The Terrible Catastrophe, or, Biblical Deluge; illustrated and corroborated by mythology, tradition, and geology, to which is added a brief interpretation of the creation, with notes from theologians, philosophers, and scientists.

James Laurence Hutton, Acts: Deluge--The Other Cheek and the Dragon, 1969, Priv. pub.  Cain's evil race mixed with Seth's (the Sons of God), corrupting their blood.  "The Bible proves that when races mix, it is a perfect set-up for Satan."

Charles Lee Magne, The Negro and the World Crisis, 1974, New Christian Crusade Church.  Explicitly states that KJV is inerrant.  There is a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the White Nordic Israel race by using "Negroes". Whites are descended from Adam, but Negroes are the top animals--members of the ape family and are a pre-Adamic creation.  His creationists tendencies are shown by favorable quotations of Rousas J. Rushdoony, author of The Mythology of Science and instrumental in getting Whitcomb and Morris' Genesis Flood published.

W. Clyde Odeneal, Segregation:  Sin or Sensible?, 1958, Destiny Publishers as a reprint of original article in Destiny magazine.  Asserts that God created races after their own kind; nature attests to this "Divine Law"  "Segregation is an Anglo-Saxon principle because more than all the other races combined, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and related races are predominantly the Bible-reading, Bible-disseminating peoples of the world."  States that "miscegenation was the principle [sic] sin which brought on the great flood of antiquity."  Says that racial equality is a communist notion; notes that leading anti-segregationists are non- or anti-Christian.  And give the de riguer anatomical differences between whites and blacks.

B.H. Payne, The Negro:  What Is His Ethnological Status?, 1867.  Carroll cites this one as the originator of the theory that Genesis describes a pre-Adamic creation of "Negroes".  According to Payne, Negroes are the most cunning of the "beasts" and were "created" to be servants of the Adamic (white) race.

Keen Polk Everything After Its Kind (pamphlet), 1932, private publication.  "A new and critical study of the origin of the Negro, according to Holy Scriptures."  Keen thinks that blacks are the "beasts of the field" of Genesis.  The Adamic line (whites again) interbred with the blacks as referred to the sons of God and daughters of men of Genesis 6.  Reads Leviticus as specifying the death penalty for sexual relations with "beasts", who are the "Negroes" of Keen's definition.  "The Negro has been put here upon earth by God for some purpose.  We may rest assured that purpose was not racial or social equality."

Alfred Rosenberg, Myth of the Twentieth Century, 1930 (latest edition 1982, Noontide Press)  Rosenberg was the official Nazi philosopher and editor of the nazi newspaper Der Volkische Beobachter.  Rosenberg presents a racial view of history.  God created man as separate races--not as individuals or mankind as a whole.  Only the race has a soul, and no two have the same soul. The higher races must rule over the lower, not interbreed with them.  Cross-breeding destroys the literally divine combination of physical heredity and spirit.  Rosenberg "proves" Egyptian, Libyan, and Indian rulers were pure Nordics.  Jesus was also a pure Nordic untainted by Jewish blood.

Alexander Schiffner, The Origin of the Races; and Pre-Adamic Man, 1968, Prophetic Herald.  According to Schiffner, once again the "Negro" is the "beast" of Genesis, and was created, along with "the yellow race" before Adam.  Once again with Genesis 6, Schiffner says that the "sons of God"--the white men--mated with Negroes.  God punished them for this sin with the worldwide Flood, but Negroes (presumably a pair) were taken on the Ark with the "other" animals.

Alfred P.K.E. Schultz, Race or Mongrel, 1908, L.C. Page.  "A brief history of the rise and fall of the ancient races of earth; a theory that the fall of nations is due to intermarriage with alien stocks; a demonstration that a nation's strength is due to racial purity; a prophecy that America will sink to early decay unless immigration is rigorously restricted.  Schultz also wrote The End of Darwinism:  Not Change But Persistence is Characteristic of Life.

Gerald Burton Winrod, Science, Christ and the Bible, 1929, Fleming H. Revell.  This book is based upon Winrod's sermons.  Winrod was described by Marsden as a vocal anti-Communist, anti-Semitic, and pro-Nazi fundamentalist.  "Between the proved facts of science and the truth of Christianity there is perfect harmony, but between the guesses of scientists and the dogma of religionists there is discord."  "Noah prophesied that Ham's descendants --the black race -- would be a servant people."  Says that Nimrod was black.  Favors the Anglo-Israel doctrine that America and England descended from the Israelite tribes of Mannasseh and Ephraim.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
17th April 2003 at 10:12 PM Frumious Bandersnatch said this in Post #22

Lighter skin color apparently evolved as an adaptation to less sun shine in cooler climes. 

Not just the skin, but the eyes and the hair also. With out the pigment or the melanin. The hair would be blond or red, and the eyes would be blue or a grayish blue.

The body produces melanin that causes the skin, hair and eyes to become darker. This protest people against the sun. If you follow evolutionary theory, it takes many thousands of years. Because in Alaska the people still have dark skin, hair and eyes. But also it has been shown that they are the most recent people to migrate here from Asia and they have not been in Alaska for very long at all, less then 2000 years.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
18th April 2003 at 02:15 PM Crusadar said this in Post #25

PM Frumious Bandersnatch said this in Post #22:

I think you are wrong about this.

Lets hope that you are right. But I believe that mere conventions of man whether it be creationism or evolution will not solve racism, prejudices, hatred or the like, there needs to be absolutes from a higher authority such as God.

Ironically among the most racist people I have ever known where Southern Baptists and creationists all the way. They were the parents of one of my girl friends in highschool and the the first really racist people I ever met. They were from Alabama and much opposed to integration which was just getting started in the south in those days.  They were also quite capable of defending their position with Bible verses.  Of course, the fact that some Christians have used the Bible to to support racism as those people and Henry Morris did does not invalidate the Christian religion any more than the fact that some people have misused evolutionary theory to support racism invalidates evolutionary theory.   However, modern evolutionary theory clearly shows me that there is only one race of humans, the human race, for reasons that I explained above.

The Frumious Bandersnatch
 
Upvote 0

lucaspa

Legend
Oct 22, 2002
14,569
416
New York
✟39,809.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
19th April 2003 at 12:35 PM JohnR7 said this in Post #31

Not just the skin, but the eyes and the hair also. With out the pigment or the melanin. The hair would be blond or red, and the eyes would be blue or a grayish blue.

The body produces melanin that causes the skin, hair and eyes to become darker. This protest people against the sun. If you follow evolutionary theory, it takes many thousands of years. Because in Alaska the people still have dark skin, hair and eyes. But also it has been shown that they are the most recent people to migrate here from Asia and they have not been in Alaska for very long at all, less then 2000 years
.

It's more complex than this, and more interesting.  It turns out that melanin prevents the breakdown of folate (vitamin B) by UV radiation.  The lack of folate causes neural tube defects in embryogenesis and cuts sperm production.  But UV is necessary to react with cholesterol to form the precursor of vitamin D. So in less sunlight, there is not enough vitamin D, which results in rickets and other bone disorders.

1 G Kirchwager, Black and white: the biology of skin color. Discover 22: 32-33, Feb. 2001.
 
Upvote 0

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
55
Visit site
✟29,869.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/racism.html

From Henry Morris's (well known creationist) The Beginning Of the World, Second Edition (1991), pp. 147-148:

The descendants of Ham were marked especially for secular service to mankind. Indeed they were to be 'servants of servants,' that is 'servants extraordinary!' Although only Canaan is mentioned specifically (possibly because the branch of Ham's family through Canaan would later come into most direct contact with Israel), the whole family of Ham is in view. The prophecy is worldwide in scope and, since Shem and Japheth are covered, all Ham's descendants must be also. These include all nations which are neither Semitic nor Japhetic. Thus, all of the earth's 'colored' races,--yellow, red, brown, and black--essentially the Afro-Asian group of peoples, including the American Indians--are possibly Hamitic in origin and included within the scope of the Canaanitic prophecy, as well as the Egyptians, Sumerians, Hittites, and Phoenicians of antiquity.

The Hamites have been the great 'servants' of mankind in the following ways, among many others: (1) they were the original explorers and settlers of practically all parts of the world, following the dispersion at Babel; (2) they were the first cultivators of most of the basic food staples of the world, such as potatoes, corn, beans, cereals, and others, as well as the first ones to domesticate most animals; (3) they developed most of the basic types of structural forms and building tools and materials; (4) they were the first to develop fabrics for clothing and various sewing and weaving devices; (5) they were the discoverers and inventors of an amazingly wide variety of medicines and surgical practices and instruments; (6) most of the concepts of basic mathematics, including algebra, geometry, and trigonometry were developed by Hamites; (7) the machinery of commerce and trade--money, banks, postal systems, etc.--were invented by them; (8) they developed paper, ink, block printing, movable type, and other accoutrements of writing and communication. It seems that almost no matter what the particular device or principle or system may be, if one traces back far enough, he will find that it originated with the Sumerians or Egyptians or early Chinese or some other Hamitic people. Truly they have been the 'servants' of mankind in a most amazing way.

Yet the prophecy again has its obverse side. Somehow they have only gone so far and no farther. The Japhethites and Semites have, sooner or later, taken over their territories, and their inventions, and then developed them and utilized them for their own enlargement. Often the Hamites, especially the Negroes, have become actual personal servants or even slaves to the others. Possessed of a genetic character concerned mainly with mundane matters, they have eventually been displaced by the intellectual and philosophical acumen of the Japhethites and the religious zeal of the Semites.
 
Upvote 0

Crusadar

Criado de Cristo
Mar 28, 2003
485
12
MN
Visit site
✟23,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
lucaspa said this in Post #30: It's a vain hope, because racism was originally justified by the "higher authority" of God. And is still justified by that. 

If you examine your sources carefully, what you will find is that much of these works were written by fallible men who have polluted the Scriptures with evolutionary thinking. Just by reading the Bible alone you will get no indication that Adam was of any particular color, nor was there the existence of any pre- Adamite race.  These ideas can be traced back to evolutionary thinking that are deeply rooted in the incredulity and compromise of Scripture - mainly that of a literal 6 day creation.

As I have said in several other threads many consider themselves to be Christians, but give shame to the name. These individuals are no different if they insist on believing that the almighty God of the Bible condones such beliefs about the different people groups. The examples you cited makes no argument against the validity of the authority of scripture in solving racial issues.

There is however a difference between individual interpretations of scripture and acting out what one believes as truth. Take for example the justification used when the Aborigines of Australia were hunted down, killed, skinned for specimens to be placed in museums all over the world- all in the name of evolution. This was done simply because they were believed to be the missing link between man and ape. Or the ordeal of Ote Menga – a pigmy who was brought over from Africa during the 1904 world fair to contrast his primitive lifestyle with the advance lifestyle of that day, and who later was placed in the Bronx zoo in a cage alongside an orangutan to show and contrast the resemblance between him and the ape. In which numerous crowds gathered just to see the exhibit. Later when he was released - he shot himself (I don’t blame him).

You should realize much of the church today teaches the Bible more as a book of morals stories and allegories as oppose to literal history because of the influence by millions of years and evolutionary ideas. If the church had been teaching the Bible as real history and connecting the Bible to the real world in every area to include the origin of the different people groups and not promote evolutionary thinking as in theistic evolution, progressive creationism, gap theory and the like, - maybe the world would now be sitting up and listening to the church for answers.

Taking only the Bible alone, without any outside influence or interpretation, what it teaches is that there is only a single race of humans, as all are descendants of one man and one woman – Adam and Eve. Even though it is not politically correct to admit this today - evolution still is a racist philosophy. There are even scientists who are willing to be consistent and admit that there is a connection between molecules-to-man evolution and racist views or prejudices concerning the different people groups. It is pitiful to note that the very textbook that was used by John Scopes at the 1925 Scopes trial taught students to be racist as in the following excerpt from that textbook:

“The Races of man—At the present time there exist upon the earth five races or varieties of man, each very different from the other in instincts, social customs, and, to an extent in structure. These are the Ethiopian or Negro type, originating in Africa; the Malay or brown race, from the islands of the Pacific; the American Indian; the Mongolian or yellow race, including the natives of China, Japan, and the Eskimos; and finally, the highest type of all, the Caucasians, represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America.” - Hunter, George William. A Civic Biology Presented in Problems, American Book Company, New York, 1914. P.196.

The solution to racism can only be founded on the absolute authority of the word of God, for it is written:

“And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; Acts 17:26 KJV.

The only answer that all humans need is Jesus Christ:

“For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;” Romans 3: 23-25 KJV
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
42
Visit site
✟36,317.00
Faith
Taoist
So what I have seen of this post we have discovered that,

Both christian and non christian men are fallible.

That both evolution and creationism has been twisted to match their fallible views of racism.

Both Evolution and creationism take a stance opposite of racism when we really look into it.

Does that sound about right?
 
Upvote 0

Crusadar

Criado de Cristo
Mar 28, 2003
485
12
MN
Visit site
✟23,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
seebs said this in Post #18: Hitler also claimed he was killing Jews because they killed the Messiah. The delusions of madmen are not relevant.

Yes a madman who truly believed the Jewish people were genetically defective. He also believed that it required only 180 days to get the most usage out of them by working them to death and then extract whatever usable part he could from them then kill them off like mere animals. Clearly this relates more to evolutionary thinking than religious reasoning? For according to evolution - man evolved from slime and has no soul, man is but an animal, a higher form of animal - but an animal nonetheless. The religious aspect was only a side issue to further justify the mass annihilation of a genetically inferior race.

What's that got to do with anything? Evolutionary theory and modern biology have dispelled the idea of some races being "more advanced" than others. There is no such concept in science; it doesn't make sense, and we know better. People are still often racist for religious reasons.

If only that were true. Even the late Dr. Stephen Gould, a paleontologist, atheist, and die hard evolutionist admits that there may have been racism before Darwin's time, but it increased in order of magnitudes after evolution was accepted. What makes you so sure that is not the case in this day and age? And the religious aspect, I hardly think the God of the bible condones such practices, for if they are true believers of God, they would know the consequences for such reasoning.

Because racism was never founded on scientific thought in the first place; evolution, by giving us the tools to evaluate racist claims scientifically, only solved part of the problem.

Scientifically - probably not, but how many individuals actually think things over before grasping on what is handed to them as being the facts of reality? Hatred is caused neither by fallible theories nor has it been eliminated by any theory, for it is in the very nature of man to hate and be wicked. Because when you think about it, modification of moral standards or personal behavior to within acceptable ranges have become simply an option to avoid punishment or reprimand, as oppose to adherence and devotion to an absolute code of conduct - in that of the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

euphoric

He hates these cans!!
Jun 22, 2002
480
5
49
Visit site
✟23,271.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Crusadar-

It has been explained to you several times now that evolutionary theory is not "racist."  Racists may use a warped version of the theory to justify their views, but that has no bearing on the validity or usefulness of the thoery whatsoever.  If this is an attempt to cast doubt on the validity of evolutionary theory by trying to associate it with something unpleasant, then it won't work.  I suggest arguing the matter on the evidence rather than trying to use an emotional ploy to smear science.

-brett
 
  • Like
Reactions: hordeprime
Upvote 0