Does Evolution conflict with the Bible?

[time]

The only conflict is between people's interpretations of the Bible and evolution.

Oh, really?

 

[time]

Source for this claim about God? Why can't God use a random process as PART of His means of creating? .

Why couldn't a random process be part of the plan of salvation? Because God doesn't play dice.

 

[HitchSlap]

Why did you resurrect a thread from '03?

 

[Amazing Horse]

This is a Christian forum. As Christians we believe the Bible is without error and is the word of God. That is what makes us Christian and that is what makes this a Christian forum.

If you say that Evolution conflicts with the Bible. Then you have effective falsified Evolution. But I see a lot of people here, if I agree with them or not, who feel there is no conflict at all between Evolution and the Word of God. They seem to feel that Evolution just covers an area the Bible simply does not discuss or talk about. At least not directly in a plain way. Although the Bible does seem to indicate that life goes from simple to more complex and advanced forms. Man was after all, not created untill the sixth day. Or some people feel that man as we know him was not created until the eighth day.

We don't need to falsify evolution , it's unproven theory for 150+ years it's not Law of Evolution.

God could just create Old Earth and Old universe just like he created alredy Old Adam and not baby Adam.

 

[HitchSlap]

We don't need to falsify evolution , it's unproven theory for 150+ years it's not Law of Evolution.

You're a little confused... ToE is fact and hasn't been falsified in over 150 years. As someone ignorant of the facts, you should consider evolution to be "Law of Evolution."

 

[Amazing Horse]

You're a little confused... ToE is fact and hasn't been falsified in over 150 years. As someone ignorant of the facts, you should consider evolution to be "Law of Evolution."

Bible is not falsified either , wanna consider it and it's laws aswell?

Also if nobody prove spaghetti monster for next 150 years will you consider law of spaghetti monster ?

 

[HitchSlap]

Bible is not falsified either , wanna consider it and it's laws aswell?

Also if nobody prove spaghetti monster for next 150 years will you consider law of spaghetti monster ?

Bible is falsified as well. Sorry, but you should know this.

(Maybe I assume to much... you have read the bible, right?)

 

[Subduction Zone]

We don't need to falsify evolution , it's unproven theory for 150+ years it's not Law of Evolution.

God could just create Old Earth and Old universe just like he created alredy Old Adam and not baby Adam.

In the world of science theories if anything outrank laws.

And nothing is ever absolutely proven in science. But if your definition is the same as the legal definition of proven, then yes, the theory of evolution has been proven.

 

[Amazing Horse]

Bible is falsified as well. Sorry, but you should know this.

(Maybe I assume to much... you have read the bible, right?)

Can you show proof of this ?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why couldn't a random process be part of the plan of salvation? Because God doesn't play dice.

So you are saying that God is not bright enough to play dice?

 

[HitchSlap]

Can you show proof of this ?

What do you consider "proof?"

 

[HitchSlap]

So you are saying that God is not bright enough to play dice?

If god knows all possible outcomes, wouldn't exactly be 'gambling,' would it?

 

[Amazing Horse]

What do you consider "proof?"

Anything from real world which contradict bible .

 

[HitchSlap]

Anything from real world which contradict bible .

You mean like the moon being "a lesser light"? In the real world, the moon produces no light of it's own, and is in fact, completely out of the suns reflection several days a month.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Anything from real world which contradict bible .

So the obvious evidence that there was no flood of Noah would count, right?

 

[Amazing Horse]

You mean like the moon being "a lesser light"? In the real world, the moon produces no light of it's own, and is in fact, completely out of the suns reflection several days a month.

Same question as why sunrise if sun does not rise , this is talking from perspective of person who is hovering over waters on earth , from that perspective sun is giving light and also is rising , and moon is giving light because it shine in night compared to everything that is dark in night and is also rising .

 

[HitchSlap]

Same question as why sunrise if sun does not rise , this is talking from perspective of person who is hovering over waters on earth , from that perspective sun is giving light and also is rising , and moon is giving light because it shine in night compared to everything that is dark in night and is also rising .

Equivocation fallacy with a dose of special pleading. Either god created a "lesser" light, or he didn't.

"And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also."

 

[bhsmte]

This is a Christian forum. As Christians we believe the Bible is without error and is the word of God. That is what makes us Christian and that is what makes this a Christian forum.

If you say that Evolution conflicts with the Bible. Then you have effective falsified Evolution. But I see a lot of people here, if I agree with them or not, who feel there is no conflict at all between Evolution and the Word of God. They seem to feel that Evolution just covers an area the Bible simply does not discuss or talk about. At least not directly in a plain way. Although the Bible does seem to indicate that life goes from simple to more complex and advanced forms. Man was after all, not created untill the sixth day. Or some people feel that man as we know him was not created until the eighth day.

Do all christians believe in a literal interpretation of the bible? That is news to me.

 

[time]

Why did you resurrect a thread from '03?

Time seems to fly.

 

[time]

If god knows all possible outcomes, wouldn't exactly be 'gambling,' would it?

If He formed man from the ground one fine day, neither would that be random, nor a gamble.